Literature DB >> 2643220

Comparison between duodenal button and duodenal segment in pancreas transplantation.

A M D'Alessandro1, H W Sollinger, R J Stratta, M Kalayoglu, J D Pirsch, F O Belzer.   

Abstract

Two technical modifications have been suggested for whole-pancreas transplantation with bladder drainage. The duodenal button technique (DB [Madison]) and the duodenal segment technique (DS [Iowa]) are the most commonly performed procedures (1,2). From December 1985 until May 1988 we performed 32 combined pancreas-kidney transplants using DB and DS techniques in 17 and 15 patients, respectively. Bladder leaks, pancreatitis, bleeding episodes, and surgically related infections were all decreased with the duodenal segment technique. Metabolic acidosis was more common with DS but was easily managed with oral sodium bicarbonate. The one-year actuarial graft survival with DB is less when compared with DS (76.1% vs. 87.5%). Three technical graft losses occurred with DB vs. none with DS. One graft was lost in each group to rejection. Our results indicate that the duodenal segment technique of bladder implantation adds safety to whole-pancreas transplantation and must now be considered the procedure of choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2643220     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-198901000-00026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  8 in total

1.  The bladder drainage technique in pancreas transplantation--the Tübingen experience.

Authors:  U T Hopt; M Büsing; W D Schareck; H D Becker
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Urological complications in 210 consecutive simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants with bladder drainage.

Authors:  H W Sollinger; E M Messing; D E Eckhoff; J D Pirsch; A M D'Alessandro; M Kalayoglu; S J Knechtle; D Hickey; F O Belzer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Duodenal segment complications in vascularized pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  R J Stratta; R Sindhi; D Sudan; J T Jerius; S J Radio
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Conservative Pancreas Graft Preservation at the Extreme.

Authors:  Jerome Martin Laurence; Gonzalo Sapisochin; Markus Selzner; Andrea Norgate; Deepali Kumar; Ian D McGilvary; Paul D Preig; Jeffrey Schiff; Mark S Cattral
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2015-12-15

5.  Experience with 500 simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants.

Authors:  H W Sollinger; J S Odorico; S J Knechtle; A M D'Alessandro; M Kalayoglu; J D Pirsch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Experience with 100 consecutive simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplants with bladder drainage.

Authors:  H W Sollinger; S J Knechtle; A Reed; A M D'Alessandro; M Kalayoglu; F O Belzer; J Pirsch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Longitudinal histopathologic assessment of rejection after bladder-drained canine pancreas allograft transplantation.

Authors:  R D Allen; J M Grierson; H Ekberg; W J Hawthorne; P Williamson; S A Deane; J R Chapman; G J Stewart; J M Little
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Preserving the Pancreas Graft: Outcomes of Surgical Repair of Duodenal Leaks in Enterically Drained Pancreas Allografts.

Authors:  David Al-Adra; Ian McGilvray; Nicolas Goldaracena; Vinzent Spetzler; Jerome Laurence; Andrea Norgate; Max Marquez; Paul Greig; Gonzalo Sapisochin; Jeffrey Schiff; Sunita Singh; Markus Selzner; Mark Cattral
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2017-06-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.