Literature DB >> 26432113

Corneal sensitivity after small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis.

Dan Z Reinstein1, Timothy J Archer2, Marine Gobbe2, Elena Bartoli2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To longitudinally evaluate corneal sensitivity after small-incision lenticule extraction and compare the results with those in previous studies.
SETTING: London Vision Clinic, London, United Kingdom.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: Consecutive myopic eyes treated with small-incision lenticule extraction using the Visumax femtosecond laser were studied. Corneal sensitivity was measured centrally and at 4 paracentral locations using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer preoperatively and 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Results were compared with averaged results from previous laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and small-incision lenticule extraction studies.
RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent was -6.85 diopters (D) ± 2.57 (SD). The mean age was 36 ± 11 years. After small-incision lenticule extraction, the preoperative mean central corneal sensitivity dropped from 54 mm preoperatively to 33 mm 1 day postoperatively, rising to 40 mm, 45 mm, 48 mm, 54 mm, and 55 mm over 12 months; it reached baseline at 6 months (P > .05). For 21 LASIK studies, the mean central corneal sensitivity dropped from 56 mm preoperatively to 6 mm at 1 day, rising to 14 mm, 23 mm, 34 mm, 45 mm, and 51 mm over 12 months. For 8 small-incision lenticule extraction studies, central corneal sensitivity dropped from 57 mm preoperatively to 39 mm at 1 week, then rose to 39 mm, 42 mm, 49 mm, 52 mm, and 54 mm over 12 months; it was higher than after LASIK at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Recovery of central corneal sensitivity to baseline was reached by 6 months after small-incision lenticule extraction and was higher than after LASIK for the first 6 months after surgery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Reinstein is a consultant to Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, has a proprietary interest in the Artemis technology (Arcscan, Inc.), and is an author of patents related to very high-frequency digital ultrasound administered by the Center for Technology Licensing at Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2015 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26432113     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.12.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  5 in total

Review 1.  Refractive surgery beyond 2020.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Damien Gatinel; Dan Z Reinstein; Erik Mertens; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Refractive lenticule extraction small incision lenticule extraction: A new refractive surgery paradigm.

Authors:  Sri Ganesh; Sheetal Brar; Raghavender Reddy Arra
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Two-year outcome of an eye that underwent hyperopic LASIK following inadvertent myopic SMILE lenticule in situ implantation.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Jianmin Shang; Lingling Niu; Haipeng Xu; Dong Yang; Yu Zhao; Dan Fu; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 4.  History and Results; Indications and Contraindications of SMILE Compared With LASIK.

Authors:  Rupal Shah
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct

Review 5.  Advances in refractive corneal lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Matthias Fuest; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.