Daniela Haluza1, Stana Simic2, Jan Höltge1, Renate Cervinka1, Hanns Moshammer1. 1. Institute of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 2. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Lifetime risk for melanoma skin cancer is enlarged by sunlight exposure and reduced by sun protection. Austrian melanoma incidence and mortality rates are constantly rising with higher rates in males. Thus, we aimed at investigating gender-specific recreational sun exposure habits among the Austrian population. METHODS: We conducted a telephone survey among 1500 adults (50.5% females) representing sociodemographic characteristics of the Austrian population. Using a structured questionnaire, we studied gender-specific sun exposure-related knowledge, motives to tan, and behavior. RESULTS: Overall, using sunscreen, wearing sunglasses, and seeking shade were among the three most frequent sun safe measures. Basic skin health knowledge and tanning motives were similar among genders, although females protected themselves more. In general, sunburn occurrence (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0-1.8), skin type IV (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.3-4.5), ex-/non-smoking (OR = 1.4-1.6, 95% CI = 1.0-2.1), low motives to tan (both OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.0-1.7), no outdoor sport (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.0-1.7), all P < 0.05, as well as the use of sunscreen with lower SPF values (OR = 1.0-3.0, 95% CI = 1.4-4.3) and male gender (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.2-2.0), both P < 0.001, increased the odds of practicing low sun protection. CONCLUSION: The results of this investigation suggest considering gender specificity when planning Public (Skin) Health-related educative campaigns and programs, for example, by highlighting the appearance-related benefits of sun light avoidance.
PURPOSE: Lifetime risk for melanoma skin cancer is enlarged by sunlight exposure and reduced by sun protection. Austrian melanoma incidence and mortality rates are constantly rising with higher rates in males. Thus, we aimed at investigating gender-specific recreational sun exposure habits among the Austrian population. METHODS: We conducted a telephone survey among 1500 adults (50.5% females) representing sociodemographic characteristics of the Austrian population. Using a structured questionnaire, we studied gender-specific sun exposure-related knowledge, motives to tan, and behavior. RESULTS: Overall, using sunscreen, wearing sunglasses, and seeking shade were among the three most frequent sun safe measures. Basic skin health knowledge and tanning motives were similar among genders, although females protected themselves more. In general, sunburn occurrence (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0-1.8), skin type IV (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.3-4.5), ex-/non-smoking (OR = 1.4-1.6, 95% CI = 1.0-2.1), low motives to tan (both OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.0-1.7), no outdoor sport (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.0-1.7), all P < 0.05, as well as the use of sunscreen with lower SPF values (OR = 1.0-3.0, 95% CI = 1.4-4.3) and male gender (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.2-2.0), both P < 0.001, increased the odds of practicing low sun protection. CONCLUSION: The results of this investigation suggest considering gender specificity when planning Public (Skin) Health-related educative campaigns and programs, for example, by highlighting the appearance-related benefits of sun light avoidance.
Authors: Daniela Haluza; Markus Schwab; Stana Simic; Renate Cervinka; Hanns Moshammer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Michael Schrempf; Daniela Haluza; Stana Simic; Stefan Riechelmann; Kathrin Graw; Gunther Seckmeyer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Casey L Daniel; Natalie R Gassman; Alyssa M Fernandez; Sejong Bae; Marcus C B Tan Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Carlos J Toro-Huamanchumo; Sara J Burgos-Muñoz; Luz M Vargas-Tineo; Jhosuny Perez-Fernandez; Otto W Vargas-Tineo; Ruth M Burgos-Muñoz; Javier A Zentner-Guevara; Carlos Bada Journal: PeerJ Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 2.984