Literature DB >> 26431616

Spoilt for choice: A critical review on the chemical and biological assessment of current wastewater treatment technologies.

Carsten Prasse1, Daniel Stalter2, Ulrike Schulte-Oehlmann3, Jörg Oehlmann3, Thomas A Ternes4.   

Abstract

The knowledge we have gained in recent years on the presence and effects of compounds discharged by wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) brings us to a point where we must question the appropriateness of current water quality evaluation methodologies. An increasing number of anthropogenic chemicals is detected in treated wastewater and there is increasing evidence of adverse environmental effects related to WWTP discharges. It has thus become clear that new strategies are needed to assess overall quality of conventional and advanced treated wastewaters. There is an urgent need for multidisciplinary approaches combining expertise from engineering, analytical and environmental chemistry, (eco)toxicology, and microbiology. This review summarizes the current approaches used to assess treated wastewater quality from the chemical and ecotoxicological perspective. Discussed chemical approaches include target, non-target and suspect analysis, sum parameters, identification and monitoring of transformation products, computational modeling as well as effect directed analysis and toxicity identification evaluation. The discussed ecotoxicological methodologies encompass in vitro testing (cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, mutagenicity, endocrine disruption, adaptive stress response activation, toxicogenomics) and in vivo tests (single and multi species, biomonitoring). We critically discuss the benefits and limitations of the different methodologies reviewed. Additionally, we provide an overview of the current state of research regarding the chemical and ecotoxicological evaluation of conventional as well as the most widely used advanced wastewater treatment technologies, i.e., ozonation, advanced oxidation processes, chlorination, activated carbon, and membrane filtration. In particular, possible directions for future research activities in this area are provided.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conventional and advanced treatment; Ecotoxicology; Environmental chemistry; Sewage; Toxicity; Wastewater quality assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26431616     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  24 in total

1.  Performance of an integrated system combining microalgae and vertical flow constructed wetlands for urban wastewater treatment.

Authors:  Elizandro Oliveira Silveira; Daiane Moura; Alexandre Rieger; Ênio Leandro Machado; Carlos Alexandre Lutterbeck
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Assessment of arsenic, fluoride, bacteria, and other contaminants in drinking water sources for rural communities of Kasur and other districts in Punjab, Pakistan.

Authors:  Nasima Arshad; Saiqa Imran
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  (Anti-)estrogenic and (anti-)androgenic effects in wastewater during advanced treatment: comparison of three in vitro bioassays.

Authors:  Linda Gehrmann; Helena Bielak; Maximilian Behr; Fabian Itzel; Sven Lyko; Anne Simon; Gotthard Kunze; Elke Dopp; Martin Wagner; Jochen Tuerk
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Effectivity of advanced wastewater treatment: reduction of in vitro endocrine activity and mutagenicity but not of in vivo reproductive toxicity.

Authors:  Sabrina Giebner; Sina Ostermann; Susanne Straskraba; Matthias Oetken; Jörg Oehlmann; Martin Wagner
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Ecotoxicological impacts of surface water and wastewater from conventional and advanced treatment technologies on brood size, larval length, and cytochrome P450 (35A3) expression in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Aennes Abbas; Lucie Valek; Ilona Schneider; Anna Bollmann; Gregor Knopp; Wolfram Seitz; Ulrike Schulte-Oehlmann; Jörg Oehlmann; Martin Wagner
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Designing field-based investigations of organic micropollutant fate in rivers.

Authors:  Clarissa Glaser; Marc Schwientek; Christiane Zarfl
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Fecal contamination of wastewater treatment plants in Portugal.

Authors:  Manuela Oliveira; Isa Serrano; Sofia Van Harten; Lucinda J Bessa; Fernando Bernardo; Paulo Martins da Costa
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Possibilities of Real Time Monitoring of Micropollutants in Wastewater Using Laser-Induced Raman & Fluorescence Spectroscopy (LIRFS) and Artificial Intelligence (AI).

Authors:  Claudia Post; Niklas Heyden; André Reinartz; Aaron Foerderer; Simon Bruelisauer; Volker Linnemann; William Hug; Florian Amann
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Degradation of orange dyes and carbamazepine by soybean peroxidase immobilized on silica monoliths and titanium dioxide.

Authors:  Paola Calza; Dario Zacchigna; Enzo Laurenti
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  The use of peracetic acid for estrogen removal from urban wastewaters: E2 as a case study.

Authors:  Rita Maurício; Joana Jorge; Rita Dias; João P Noronha; Leonor Amaral; Michiel A Daam; António P Mano; Mário S Diniz
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.