PURPOSE: The evolutionary conservation of the retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR) gene was examined across vertebrate and invertebrate lineages to elucidate its function. METHODS: Orthologous RPGR sequences from vertebrates and invertebrates were selected. Multiple sequence alignments, phylogenetic analyses, synteny, and gene structure comparisons were carried out. Expression of the alternatively spliced constitutive (RPGR(const) or RPGR(ex1-19)) and RPGR(ORF15) isoforms was examined in developing and adult zebrafish. RESULTS: Phylogenetic analyses and syntenic relationships were consistent with the selected sequences being true orthologues, although whole genome duplications in teleost fish resulted in a more complex picture. The splice form RPGR(const) was present in all vertebrate and invertebrate species but the defining carboxyl (C)-terminal exon of RPGR(ORF15) was absent from all invertebrates. The regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1)-like domain adopts a seven-bladed β-propeller structure, which was present in both major splice forms and strongly conserved across evolution. The repetitive acidic region of RPGR(ORF15) showed a high rate of in-frame deletions/insertions across nine primate species, compared with flanking sequences, consistent with an unstable and rapidly evolving region. In zebrafish, RPGR(const) transcripts were most strongly expressed in early development, while the RPGR(ORF15) isoform showed highest expression in adult eye. CONCLUSIONS: The regulator of chromosome condensation 1-like domain of RPGR was conserved in vertebrates and invertebrates, but RPGR(ORF15) was unique to vertebrates, consistent with a proposed role in the ciliary-based transport of cargoes such as rhodopsin, which is ∼10 times more abundant in vertebrate than invertebrate photoreceptors. The repetitive acidic region of RPGR(ORF15) shows a rapid rate of evolution, consistent with a mutation "hot spot."
PURPOSE: The evolutionary conservation of the retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR) gene was examined across vertebrate and invertebrate lineages to elucidate its function. METHODS: Orthologous RPGR sequences from vertebrates and invertebrates were selected. Multiple sequence alignments, phylogenetic analyses, synteny, and gene structure comparisons were carried out. Expression of the alternatively spliced constitutive (RPGR(const) or RPGR(ex1-19)) and RPGR(ORF15) isoforms was examined in developing and adult zebrafish. RESULTS: Phylogenetic analyses and syntenic relationships were consistent with the selected sequences being true orthologues, although whole genome duplications in teleost fish resulted in a more complex picture. The splice form RPGR(const) was present in all vertebrate and invertebrate species but the defining carboxyl (C)-terminal exon of RPGR(ORF15) was absent from all invertebrates. The regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1)-like domain adopts a seven-bladed β-propeller structure, which was present in both major splice forms and strongly conserved across evolution. The repetitive acidic region of RPGR(ORF15) showed a high rate of in-frame deletions/insertions across nine primate species, compared with flanking sequences, consistent with an unstable and rapidly evolving region. In zebrafish, RPGR(const) transcripts were most strongly expressed in early development, while the RPGR(ORF15) isoform showed highest expression in adult eye. CONCLUSIONS: The regulator of chromosome condensation 1-like domain of RPGR was conserved in vertebrates and invertebrates, but RPGR(ORF15) was unique to vertebrates, consistent with a proposed role in the ciliary-based transport of cargoes such as rhodopsin, which is ∼10 times more abundant in vertebrate than invertebrate photoreceptors. The repetitive acidic region of RPGR(ORF15) shows a rapid rate of evolution, consistent with a mutation "hot spot."
Authors: Xinhua Shu; Graeme C Black; Jacqueline M Rice; Niki Hart-Holden; Alison Jones; Anna O'Grady; Simon Ramsden; Alan F Wright Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Xinhua Shu; Zhihong Zeng; Marion S Eckmiller; Phillipe Gautier; Dafni Vlachantoni; Forbes D C Manson; Brian Tulloch; Colin Sharpe; Dariusz C Gorecki; Alan F Wright Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Albino Bacolla; Jack R Collins; Bert Gold; Nadia Chuzhanova; Ming Yi; Robert M Stephens; Stefan Stefanov; Adam Olsh; John P Jakupciak; Michael Dean; Richard A Lempicki; David N Cooper; Robert D Wells Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2006-05-19 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Peter D Stenson; Matthew Mort; Edward V Ball; Katy Shaw; Andrew Phillips; David N Cooper Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Joseph C Giacalone; Jeaneen L Andorf; Qihong Zhang; Erin R Burnight; Dalyz Ochoa; Austin J Reutzel; Malia M Collins; Val C Sheffield; Robert F Mullins; Ian C Han; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker Journal: Hum Gene Ther Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 5.695
Authors: Jason Charng; Artur V Cideciyan; Samuel G Jacobson; Alexander Sumaroka; Sharon B Schwartz; Malgorzata Swider; Alejandro J Roman; Rebecca Sheplock; Manisha Anand; Marc C Peden; Hemant Khanna; Elise Heon; Alan F Wright; Anand Swaroop Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Jasmina Cehajic Kapetanovic; Michelle E McClements; Cristina Martinez-Fernandez de la Camara; Robert E MacLaren Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 4.096
Authors: Cristina Martinez-Fernandez De La Camara; Anika Nanda; Anna Paola Salvetti; M Dominik Fischer; Robert E MacLaren Journal: Expert Opin Orphan Drugs Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 0.694