Literature DB >> 26431137

Catheter-tip Granulomas Associated with Intrathecal Drug Delivery--A Two-Center Experience Identifying 13 Cases.

Tobias Kratzsch1, Martin N Stienen2, Tim Reck3, Gerhard Hildebrandt1, Petra Hoederath1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal (IT) drug therapy with implanted pumps is an effective treatment modality for chronic pain and/or spasticity, especially after non-invasive treatment has failed. Long-term use of intrathecal opioids may cause formation of inflammatory masses at the tip of intrathecal catheters, possibly leading to neurological deficits and/or catheter revision.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify risk factors for catheter-tip granuloma (CG) formation. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary Spine Centers in Germany and Switzerland.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data at 2 Swiss centers (Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Swiss Paraplegic Centre Nottwil) between 01/1994 and 10/2013. Collected data were age at operation, gender, smoking status, previous spinal operations, spinal level of catheter-tip, clinical symptoms, catheter testing with contrast agent, applied drugs, drug concentration, as well as cumulative daily drug dosages.
RESULTS: Thirteen patients with a mean age of 52.6 years and CG formation after a mean of 6.9 years of follow-up were identified and compared to 54 patients of similar age and length of follow-up (48.6 years, P = 0.535; follow-up 5.3 years, P = 0.236) without CG. In the analysis of risk factors, catheter ending in the middle thoracic spine (Th4-8; 38.5 vs. 6.5%; P = 0.010), previous spinal surgery (75 vs. 41%; P = 0.051), and chronic pain as an underlying primary symptom for IT drug therapy (100 vs. 56%, P = 0.003) were associated with CG formation. IT drug therapy for spasticity appeared to be much less associated with CG formation (0 vs. 44%, P = .0003). As the symptomatology is closely related to the medical treatment applied, patients with CG were more likely to be treated with IT morphine (77 vs. 20%; P < 0.001), and as tendency with IT clonidine (54 vs. 26%; P = 0.092) and IT bupivacaine (46 vs. 20%; P = 0.077). Average in-pump morphine concentration (30.3 vs. 19.5 mg/mL; P = 0.05) as well as average daily dose of morphine (12.5 vs. 6.2 mg/d; P = 0.037) were significantly higher in the CG group. Smoking could not be identified as risk factor for CG formation. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include the retrospective approach, the limited group size of granuloma patients, as well as missing data in the investigated patient groups.
CONCLUSION: Our patient cohort with CG differed in some features, of which some like catheter localization, choice, dosage, and the concentration of drugs are potentially modifiable. These results could contribute to the prevention of CG in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26431137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  8 in total

Review 1.  Solving the Blood-Brain Barrier Challenge for the Effective Treatment of HIV Replication in the Central Nervous System.

Authors:  Luc Bertrand; Madhavan Nair; Michal Toborek
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.116

2.  Unique Intradural Inflammatory Mass Containing Precipitated Morphine: Confirmatory Analysis by LESA-MS and MALDI-MS.

Authors:  Alexander J Kim; Sankha Basu; Carolyn Glass; Edgar L Ross; Nathalie Agar; Qing He; David Calligaris
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  P2X7 receptor as a novel drug delivery system to increase the entrance of hydrophilic drugs into cells during photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Paulo Anastácio Furtado Pacheco; Leonardo Braga Gomes Ferreira; Leonardo Mendonça; Dinarte Neto M Ferreira; Juliana Pimenta Salles; Robson Xavier Faria; Pedro Celso Nogueira Teixeira; Luiz Anastacio Alves
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.945

4.  The Application of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Methodology to Intrathecal Drug Delivery for Pain Management.

Authors:  Michael F Saulino; Teresa Patel; Stanley P Fisher
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2016-08-01

5.  Standardization of an experimental model of intradural injection after spinal cord injury in rats.

Authors:  Olavo B Letaif; Mauro C M Tavares-Júnior; Gustavo B Dos Santos; Ricardo J R Ferreira; Raphael M Marcon; Alexandre F Cristante; Tarcísio E P de Barros-Filho
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 6.  Intrathecal Drug Delivery: Advances and Applications in the Management of Chronic Pain Patient.

Authors:  Jose De Andres; Salim Hayek; Christophe Perruchoud; Melinda M Lawrence; Miguel Angel Reina; Carmen De Andres-Serrano; Ruben Rubio-Haro; Mathew Hunt; Tony L Yaksh
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 7.  Intrathecal pain management: a team-based approach.

Authors:  Jeremy A Adler; Neona M Lotz
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  Intrathecal pump catheter-tip granuloma recurrence with associated myelomalacia - How safe is intrathecal analgesic infusion therapy? A case report.

Authors:  Moritz Haering; Christian Saleh; Phillip Jaszczuk; Markus Koehler; Margret Hund-Georgiadis
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2019-04-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.