Literature DB >> 26430009

Quantification of material loss from the neck piece taper junctions of a bimodular primary hip prosthesis. A retrieval study from 27 failed Rejuvenate bimodular hip arthroplasties.

D Buente1, G Huber1, N Bishop2, M Morlock1.   

Abstract

The early failure and revision of bimodular primary total hip arthroplasty prostheses requires the identification of the risk factors for material loss and wear at the taper junctions through taper wear analysis. Deviations in taper geometries between revised and pristine modular neck tapers were determined using high resolution tactile measurements. A new algorithm was developed and validated to allow the quantitative analysis of material loss, complementing the standard visual inspection currently used. The algorithm was applied to a sample of 27 retrievals (in situ from 2.9 to 38.1 months) of the withdrawn Rejuvenate modular prosthesis. The mean wear volumes on the flat distal neck piece taper was 3.35 mm(3) (0.55 to 7.57), mainly occurring in a characteristic pattern in areas with high mechanical loading. Wear volume tended to increase with time to revision (r² = 0.423, p = 0.001). Implant and patient specific data (offset, stem size, patient's mass, age and body mass index) did not correlate with the amount of material loss observed (p > 0.078). Bilaterally revised implants showed higher amounts of combined total material loss and similar wear patterns on both sides. The consistent wear pattern found in this study has not been reported previously, suggesting that the device design and materials are associated with the failure of this prosthesis. ©2015 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bi-Modular Taper; Deviation Pattern; Material Loss; Rejuvenate; Surface Changes; Taper Wear

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26430009     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.35342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  7 in total

1.  Cementless modular neck stems: are they a safe option in primary total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  José M Pelayo-de-Tomás; José L Rodrigo-Pérez; Carlos D Novoa-Parra; Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; María Morales-Suárez-Varela; José Antonio Blas-Dobón
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-10-29

Review 2.  Corrosion of the Head-Stem Taper Junction-Are We on the Verge of an Epidemic?: Review Article.

Authors:  Michael Morlock; Dennis Bünte; Julian Gührs; Nicholas Bishop
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-09-20

3.  Synchrotron-based characterization of arthroprosthetic CoCrMo particles in human bone marrow.

Authors:  Janosch Schoon; Bernhard Hesse; Remi Tucoulou; Sven Geissler; Melanie Ort; Georg N Duda; Carsten Perka; Georgi I Wassilew; Giorgio Perino; Anastasia Rakow
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.727

Review 4.  Explant analysis and implant registries are both needed to further improve patient safety.

Authors:  M M Morlock; E Gomez-Barrena; D C Wirtz; A Hart; J P Kretzer
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-05-31

5.  Clinically insignificant trunnionosis in large-diameter metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H S Hothi; D Kendoff; C Lausmann; J Henckel; T Gehrke; J Skinner; A Hart
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.853

6.  Diagnostic guidelines for the histological particle algorithm in the periprosthetic neo-synovial tissue.

Authors:  G Perino; S Sunitsch; M Huber; D Ramirez; J Gallo; J Vaculova; S Natu; J P Kretzer; S Müller; P Thomas; M Thomsen; M G Krukemeyer; H Resch; T Hügle; W Waldstein; F Böettner; T Gehrke; S Sesselmann; W Rüther; Z Xia; E Purdue; V Krenn
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2018-08-25

7.  Retrieval Findings of Recalled Dual-Taper Hips.

Authors:  Anna Di Laura; Harry S Hothi; Johann Henckel; Young-Min Kwon; John A Skinner; Alister J Hart
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 5.284

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.