Literature DB >> 26430006

A longitudinal study of MARS MRI scanning of soft-tissue lesions around metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties and disease progression.

T W Briant-Evans1, N Lyle1, S Barbur1, J Hauptfleisch2, R Amess3, A R Pearce1, K S Conn1, G J Stranks1, J M Britton1.   

Abstract

We investigated the changes seen on serial metal artefact reduction magnetic resonance imaging scans (MARS-MRI) of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties (MoM THAs). In total 155 THAs, in 35 male and 100 female patients (mean age 70.4 years, 42 to 91), underwent at least two MRI scans at a mean interval of 14.6 months (2.6 to 57.1), at a mean of 48.2 months (3.5 to 93.3) after primary hip surgery. Scans were graded using a modification of the Oxford classification. Progression of disease was defined as an increase in grade or a minimum 10% increase in fluid lesion volume at second scan. A total of 16 hips (30%) initially classified as 'normal' developed an abnormality on the second scan. Of those with 'isolated trochanteric fluid' 9 (47%) underwent disease progression, as did 7 (58%) of 'effusions'. A total of 54 (77%) of hips initially classified as showing adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) progressed, with higher rates of progression in higher grades. Disease progression was associated with high blood cobalt levels or an irregular pseudocapsule lining at the initial scan. There was no association with changes in functional scores. Adverse reactions to metal debris in MoM THAs may not be as benign as previous reports have suggested. Close radiological follow-up is recommended, particularly in high-risk groups. ©2015 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Follow-up; Longitudinal; MARS; MRI; Metal-on-metal; Pseudotumours; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26430006     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.34131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  5 in total

1.  Comparative study of fat-suppression techniques for hip arthroplasty MR imaging.

Authors:  Sébastien Molière; Jean-Philippe Dillenseger; Matthieu Ehlinger; Stéphane Kremer; Guillaume Bierry
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Adverse Local Tissue Reactions are Common in Asymptomatic Individuals After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Interim Report from a Prospective Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Madeleine A Gao; John P Neri; Yu-Fen Chiu; Bin Q Lin; Alissa J Burge; Edwin Su; Douglas E Padgett; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Revision surgery of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties for adverse reactions to metal debris.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Antti Eskelinen; Andrew Judge; Hemant G Pandit; David W Murray
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Adverse Local Tissue Reactions are Common in Asymptomatic Individuals After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Interim Report from a Prospective Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Madeleine A Gao; John P Neri; Yu-Fen Chiu; Bin Q Lin; Alissa J Burge; Edwin Su; Douglas E Padgett; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Andrew Judge; Antti Eskelinen; David W Murray; Hemant G Pandit
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.