Rodrigo Mariño1, Utsana Tonmukayakul2, David Manton3, Andrew Stranieri4, Ken Clarke5. 1. Oral Health CRC, Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia r.marino@unimelb.edu.au. 2. Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia. 3. Oral Health CRC, Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 4. Centre for Informatics and Applied Optimisation, Federation University, Ballarat, Australia. 5. Melbourne Networked Society Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this research was to conduct a cost-analysis, from a public healthcare perspective, comparing the cost and benefits of face-to-face patient examination assessments conducted by a dentist at a residential aged care facility (RACF) situated in rural areas of the Australian state of Victoria, with two teledentistry approaches utilizing virtual oral examination. METHODS: The costs associated with implementing and operating the teledentistry approach were identified and measured using 2014 prices in Australian dollars. Costs were measured as direct intervention costs and programme costs. A population of 100 RACF residents was used as a basis to estimate the cost of oral examination and treatment plan development for the traditional face-to-face model vs. two teledentistry models: an asynchronous review and treatment plan preparation; and real-time communication with a remotely located oral health professional. RESULTS: It was estimated that if 100 residents received an asynchronous oral health assessment and treatment plan, the net cost from a healthcare perspective would be AU$32.35 (AU$27.19-AU$38.49) per resident. The total cost of the conventional face-to-face examinations by a dentist would be AU$36.59 ($30.67-AU$42.98) per resident using realistic assumptions. Meanwhile, the total cost of real-time remote oral examination would be AU$41.28 (AU$34.30-AU$48.87) per resident. DISCUSSION: Teledental asynchronous patient assessments were the lowest cost service model. Access to oral health professionals is generally low in RACFs; however, the real-time consultation could potentially achieve better outcomes due to two-way communication between the nurse and a remote oral health professional via health promotion/disease prevention delivered in conjunction with the oral examination.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this research was to conduct a cost-analysis, from a public healthcare perspective, comparing the cost and benefits of face-to-face patient examination assessments conducted by a dentist at a residential aged care facility (RACF) situated in rural areas of the Australian state of Victoria, with two teledentistry approaches utilizing virtual oral examination. METHODS: The costs associated with implementing and operating the teledentistry approach were identified and measured using 2014 prices in Australian dollars. Costs were measured as direct intervention costs and programme costs. A population of 100 RACF residents was used as a basis to estimate the cost of oral examination and treatment plan development for the traditional face-to-face model vs. two teledentistry models: an asynchronous review and treatment plan preparation; and real-time communication with a remotely located oral health professional. RESULTS: It was estimated that if 100 residents received an asynchronous oral health assessment and treatment plan, the net cost from a healthcare perspective would be AU$32.35 (AU$27.19-AU$38.49) per resident. The total cost of the conventional face-to-face examinations by a dentist would be AU$36.59 ($30.67-AU$42.98) per resident using realistic assumptions. Meanwhile, the total cost of real-time remote oral examination would be AU$41.28 (AU$34.30-AU$48.87) per resident. DISCUSSION: Teledental asynchronous patient assessments were the lowest cost service model. Access to oral health professionals is generally low in RACFs; however, the real-time consultation could potentially achieve better outcomes due to two-way communication between the nurse and a remote oral health professional via health promotion/disease prevention delivered in conjunction with the oral examination.
Authors: Nalia Gurgel-Juarez; Cassius Torres-Pereira; Ana E Haddad; Lisa Sheehy; Hillel Finestone; Karen Mallet; Michael Wiseman; Kannika Hour; Heather L Flowers Journal: Evid Based Dent Date: 2022-07-08
Authors: Munder O Ben-Omran; Alicia A Livinski; Dorota T Kopycka-Kedzierawski; Shahdokht Boroumand; Demetres Williams; Darien J Weatherspoon; Timothy J Iafolla; Paul Fontelo; Bruce A Dye Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2021-09-11 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: Soulafa A Almazrooa; Ghada A Mansour; Sana A Alhamed; Sarah A Ali; Sara K Akeel; Nada A Alhindi; Osama M Felemban; Hani H Mawardi; Nada O Binmadi Journal: J Dent Sci Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 2.080
Authors: Luca Aquilanti; Andrea Santarelli; Marco Mascitti; Maurizio Procaccini; Giorgio Rappelli Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Giuseppe Minervini; Diana Russo; Alan Scott Herford; Francesca Gorassini; Aida Meto; Cesare D'Amico; Gabriele Cervino; Marco Cicciù; Luca Fiorillo Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2022-04-09 Impact factor: 3.246
Authors: Sanjeewa Kularatna; Ratilal Lalloo; Jeroen Kroon; Santosh K K Tadakamadla; Paul A Scuffham; Newell W Johnson Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 3.186