Literature DB >> 26429344

The service impact of failed locking plate fixation of distal tibial fractures: a service and financial evaluation at a major trauma centre.

Michael Kent1,2, Aadil Mumith3, Jo McEwan3, Nicholas Hancock3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The surgical treatment of distal tibial fractures is challenging and controversial. Recently, locking plate fixation has become popular, but the outcomes of this treatment are mixed with complication rates as high as 50 % in the published literature. There are no reports specifically relating to the financial and resource costs of failed treatment in the literature.
METHOD: Retrospective service analysis of patients who had undergone locking plate fixation of a distal third tibial fracture between 2008 and 2011 with at least 12 months follow-up. Rates of readmission, reoperation, bony union and infection were ascertained. The financial and resource (hospital stay and number of outpatient appointments) implications of failed treatment were calculated.
RESULTS: Forty-two patients were identified. There were 31 type A fractures, one type B fracture and 10 type C fractures. Three injuries were open. Twenty patients were treated with minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis (MIPO). The readmission and reoperation rates were 26 % (n = 11) and 19 % (n = 8), respectively. A total of 89 % of readmissions were due to infection. All patients had received appropriate antibiotic regimens. The average costs of successful and failed treatment were £ 5538 and £ 18,335, respectively. The average time to union was 24.5 weeks. The rate of non-union was 21 % (n = 9). The rate of infection was 28 % (n = 12), with all patients with open fracture incurring an infection. Tourniquet time had no effect on the incidence of complications. Smokers were more likely to incur a complication (p < 0.05), and non-union was lower in the MIPO group (p < 0.05). The length and total cost of inpatient care were significantly lower in the MIPO group (p < 0.05). MIPO patients were five times less likely to incur readmission or reoperation. Failed treatment was three times more expensive and four times longer than successful treatment.
CONCLUSION: The study identified a large burden to the service following failure of locking plate treatment of these fractures, but the outcomes were similar to series published in the literature. Readmission rates were high following these injuries, and failed treatment was costly and had a significant impact on hospital resources. The implementation of major trauma networks and centralised subspecialised units should improve quality and value for money.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distal tibial fracture; Economic analysis; Locking plate; Pilon fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26429344     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-015-1706-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  29 in total

1.  Indirect reduction using a simple quadrilateral frame in the application of distal tibial LCP-technical tips.

Authors:  Ian Pallister; Awen Iorwerth
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  II. Major trauma networks in England.

Authors:  A L McCullough; J C Haycock; D P Forward; C G Moran
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures.

Authors:  Heather A Vallier; Beth Ann Cureton; Brendan M Patterson
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Results of surgical treatment of tibial plafond fractures.

Authors:  G C Babis; E D Vayanos; N Papaioannou; T Pantazopoulos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Decisions and staging leading to definitive open management of pilon fractures: where have we come from and where are we now?

Authors:  Frank A Liporace; Richard S Yoon
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation of distal tibia fractures.

Authors:  Syah Bahari; Brian Lenehan; Hamad Khan; John P McElwain
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.500

7.  Minimally invasive plating of high-energy metaphyseal distal tibia fractures.

Authors:  Cory Collinge; Mark Kuper; Kirk Larson; Robert Protzman
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Early complications following the operative treatment of pilon fractures with and without diabetes.

Authors:  Alex J Kline; Gary S Gruen; Hans C Pape; Ivan S Tarkin; James J Irrgang; Dane K Wukich
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.827

9.  Intraarticular "pilon" fracture of the tibia.

Authors:  D L Helfet; K Koval; J Pappas; R W Sanders; T DiPasquale
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Distal tibia fractures: management and complications of 101 cases.

Authors:  Pierre Joveniaux; Xavier Ohl; Alain Harisboure; Aboubekr Berrichi; Ludovic Labatut; Patrick Simon; Didier Mainard; Nicolas Vix; Emile Dehoux
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Tibial pilon fractures : Advoidance and therapy of complications].

Authors:  Ralph Gaulke; Christian Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Complications after fibula intramedullary nail fixation of pilon versus ankle fractures.

Authors:  Rachel M Faber; Joshua A Parry; George H Haidukewych; Kenneth J Koval; Joshua L Langford
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-01-07

3.  Soft tissue complications in distal tibial fractures managed with medial locking plates: A myth or reality?

Authors:  Deepak Jain; Harpal Singh Selhi; Mohammad Yamin; Pankaj Mahindra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-07-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.