BACKGROUND: In order to reduce maternal mortality in South Africa (SA), it is important to understand the process of obstetric care, identify weaknesses within the system, and implement interventions for improving care. OBJECTIVE: To determine the spectrum of maternal morbidity and mortality in the Pretoria Academic Complex (PAC), SA. METHODS: A descriptive population-based study that included all women delivering in the PAC. The World Health Organization definition, criteria and indicators of near miss and maternal death were used to identify women with severe complications in pregnancy. RESULTS: Between 1 August 2013 and 31 July 2014, there were 26,614 deliveries in the PAC. The institutional maternal mortality ratio was 71.4/100,000 live births. The HIV infection rate was 19.9%, and 2.7% of women had unknown HIV status. Of the women, 1120 (4.2%) developed potentially life-threatening conditions and 136 (0.5%) life-threatening conditions. The mortality index was 14.0% overall, 30.0% for non-pregnancy-related infections, 2.0% for obstetric haemorrhage and 13.6% for hypertension. Of the women with life-threatening conditions, 39.3% were referred from the primary level of care. Vascular, uterine and coagulation dysfunctions were the most frequent organ dysfunctions in women with life-threatening conditions. The perinatal mortality rate was 26.9/1000 births overall, 23.1/1000 for women with non-life-threatening conditions, and 198.0/1000 for women with life-threatening conditions. CONCLUSION: About one in 20 pregnant women in the PAC had a potentially life-threatening condition; 39.3% of women presented to a primary level facility as an acute emergency and had to be transferred for tertiary care. All healthcare professionals involved in maternity care must have knowledge and skills that equip them to manage obstetric emergencies. Review of the basic antenatal care protocol may be necessary.
BACKGROUND: In order to reduce maternal mortality in South Africa (SA), it is important to understand the process of obstetric care, identify weaknesses within the system, and implement interventions for improving care. OBJECTIVE: To determine the spectrum of maternal morbidity and mortality in the Pretoria Academic Complex (PAC), SA. METHODS: A descriptive population-based study that included all women delivering in the PAC. The World Health Organization definition, criteria and indicators of near miss and maternal death were used to identify women with severe complications in pregnancy. RESULTS: Between 1 August 2013 and 31 July 2014, there were 26,614 deliveries in the PAC. The institutional maternal mortality ratio was 71.4/100,000 live births. The HIV infection rate was 19.9%, and 2.7% of women had unknown HIV status. Of the women, 1120 (4.2%) developed potentially life-threatening conditions and 136 (0.5%) life-threatening conditions. The mortality index was 14.0% overall, 30.0% for non-pregnancy-related infections, 2.0% for obstetric haemorrhage and 13.6% for hypertension. Of the women with life-threatening conditions, 39.3% were referred from the primary level of care. Vascular, uterine and coagulation dysfunctions were the most frequent organ dysfunctions in women with life-threatening conditions. The perinatal mortality rate was 26.9/1000 births overall, 23.1/1000 for women with non-life-threatening conditions, and 198.0/1000 for women with life-threatening conditions. CONCLUSION: About one in 20 pregnant women in the PAC had a potentially life-threatening condition; 39.3% of women presented to a primary level facility as an acute emergency and had to be transferred for tertiary care. All healthcare professionals involved in maternity care must have knowledge and skills that equip them to manage obstetric emergencies. Review of the basic antenatal care protocol may be necessary.
Authors: Robert L Goldenberg; Sarah Saleem; Sumera Ali; Janet L Moore; Adrien Lokangako; Antoinette Tshefu; Musaku Mwenechanya; Elwyn Chomba; Ana Garces; Lester Figueroa; Shivaprasad Goudar; Bhalachandra Kodkany; Archana Patel; Fabian Esamai; Paul Nsyonge; Margo S Harrison; Melissa Bauserman; Carl L Bose; Nancy F Krebs; K Michael Hambidge; Richard J Derman; Patricia L Hibberd; Edward A Liechty; Dennis D Wallace; Jose M Belizan; Menachem Miodovnik; Marion Koso-Thomas; Waldemar A Carlo; Alan H Jobe; Elizabeth M McClure Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Felix Sayinzoga; Leon Bijlmakers; Koos van der Velden; Jeroen van Dillen Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2017-11-25 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Stacie E Geller; Abigail R Koch; Caitlin E Garland; E Jane MacDonald; Francesca Storey; Beverley Lawton Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 3.223
Authors: Abera Kenay Tura; Joost Zwart; Jos van Roosmalen; Jelle Stekelenburg; Thomas van den Akker; Sicco Scherjon Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Steffie Heemelaar; Leonard Kabongo; Taati Ithindi; Christian Luboya; Fidelis Munetsi; Ann-Kathrin Bauer; Amelie Dammann; Anna Drewes; Jelle Stekelenburg; Thomas van den Akker; Shonag Mackenzie Journal: Glob Health Action Date: 2019 Impact factor: 2.640
Authors: Hannah L Nathan; Paul T Seed; Natasha L Hezelgrave; Annemarie De Greeff; Elodie Lawley; Frances Conti-Ramsden; John Anthony; Wilhelm Steyn; David R Hall; Lucy C Chappell; Andrew H Shennan Journal: J Glob Health Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 7.664