Literature DB >> 26428739

Experimental manipulation of floral scent bouquets restructures flower-visitor interactions in the field.

Anne-Amélie C Larue1, Robert A Raguso2, Robert R Junker1.   

Abstract

A common structural feature of natural communities is the non-random distribution of pairwise interactions between organisms of different trophic levels. For plant-animal interactions, it is predicted that both stochastic processes and functional plant traits that facilitate or prevent interactions are responsible for these patterns. However, unbiased manipulative field experiments that rigorously test the effects of individual traits on community structure are lacking. We address this gap by manipulating floral scent bouquets in the field. Manipulation of floral scent bouquets led to quantitative as well as qualitative restructuring of flower-visitor networks, making them more generalized. Olfactometer trials confirmed both positive and negative responses to scent bouquets. Our results clearly show that the distribution of insect visitors to the two abundant study plant species reflects the insects' species-specific preferences for floral scents, rather than for visual or morphological floral traits. Thus, floral scents may be of major importance in partitioning flower-visitor interactions. Integrating experimental manipulations of plant traits with field observations of interaction patterns thus represents a promising approach for revealing the processes that structure species assemblages in natural communities.
© 2015 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2015 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  community structure; floral extracts; floral filters; flower-visitor partitioning; olfactometer trials

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26428739     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  8 in total

Review 1.  Plant-pollinator interactions along the pathway to paternity.

Authors:  Corneile Minnaar; Bruce Anderson; Marinus L de Jager; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 2.  Understanding intraspecific variation of floral scent in light of evolutionary ecology.

Authors:  Roxane Delle-Vedove; Bertrand Schatz; Mathilde Dufay
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  In situ modeling of multimodal floral cues attracting wild pollinators across environments.

Authors:  Karin Nordström; Josefin Dahlbom; V S Pragadheesh; Suhrid Ghosh; Amadeus Olsson; Olga Dyakova; Shravanti Krishna Suresh; Shannon B Olsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The smell of environmental change: Using floral scent to explain shifts in pollinator attraction.

Authors:  Laura A Burkle; Justin B Runyon
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 1.936

5.  Disentangling the role of floral sensory stimuli in pollination networks.

Authors:  Aphrodite Kantsa; Robert A Raguso; Adrian G Dyer; Jens M Olesen; Thomas Tscheulin; Theodora Petanidou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  The Ecology of Plant Chemistry and Multi-Species Interactions in Diversified Agroecosystems.

Authors:  Rodolfo F Silva; Gabriela B P Rabeschini; Giovanna L R Peinado; Leandro G Cosmo; Luiz H G Rezende; Rafael K Murayama; Martín Pareja
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Landscape and local site variables differentially influence pollinators and pollination services in urban agricultural sites.

Authors:  Ashley B Bennett; Sarah Lovell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A biosynthetically informed distance measure to compare secondary metabolite profiles.

Authors:  Robert R Junker
Journal:  Chemoecology       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.725

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.