E Bardellini1, I Tonni1, R Micheli2, A Molinaro2, F Amadori1, P Flocchini1, G Piana3, A Majorana1. 1. Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Dental School, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy. 2. Unit of Child Neurology and Psychiatry, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy. 3. Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Dental School, University of Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Literature is poor of data about the occlusion in children affected by neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). This case-control study investigated the occlusal traits in a group of children with NF1. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: A hundred and fifteen children with NF1 were enrolled; non-NF1 controls were sequentially selected among subjects referred to the Pediatric Dentistry Department. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients underwent a clinical dental examination and a panoramic radiography. The following orthodontic variables were considered: molar relationship, overjet, overbite, cross-bite, scissor bite, and crowding/spacing. RESULTS: Class III molar relationship resulted significantly (p = 0.01) more common in children with NF1 than in the control group as well as the unilateral posterior cross-bite (p = 0.0017). Forty-three children with NF1 (37.3%) showed radiographic abnormalities; in one case, a plexiform neurofibroma was detected. CONCLUSIONS: An early orthodontic evaluation might be planned in the management of children with NF1 to prevent or decrease the need for extensive orthodontic interventions.
OBJECTIVES: Literature is poor of data about the occlusion in children affected by neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). This case-control study investigated the occlusal traits in a group of children with NF1. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: A hundred and fifteen children with NF1 were enrolled; non-NF1 controls were sequentially selected among subjects referred to the Pediatric Dentistry Department. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients underwent a clinical dental examination and a panoramic radiography. The following orthodontic variables were considered: molar relationship, overjet, overbite, cross-bite, scissor bite, and crowding/spacing. RESULTS: Class III molar relationship resulted significantly (p = 0.01) more common in children with NF1 than in the control group as well as the unilateral posterior cross-bite (p = 0.0017). Forty-three children with NF1 (37.3%) showed radiographic abnormalities; in one case, a plexiform neurofibroma was detected. CONCLUSIONS: An early orthodontic evaluation might be planned in the management of children with NF1 to prevent or decrease the need for extensive orthodontic interventions.