Literature DB >> 26428221

Receiver operating characteristic curve to predict anti-VEGF resistance in retinal vein occlusions and efficacy of Ozurdex.

Jeremy D Wolfe1,2, Ankoor R Shah1,2, Yoshihiro Yonekawa1,2, Abdulrahman Al Faran1, Michael S Franklin3, Ashkan M Abbey1,2, Antonio Capone1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Current treatment paradigms for macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusions (RVO) often involve initial treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents, then switching to intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI; Ozurdex, Allergan, Parsippany, NJ) for poor responders. However, many patients undergo multiple injections prior to being declared a nonresponder. We devised a method for prediction of poor anti-VEGF response after one injection, and show that these patients subsequently respond well to IDI.
METHODS: This study is a retrospective consecutive interventional case series of patients with RVO receiving anti-VEGF agents that were switched to IDI. Patients were categorized as nonresponders to anti-VEGF agents (edema did not improve) or responders (edema improved, but switched to IDI for longer treatment duration). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine cutoffs of reduction in central retinal thickness (CRT) to predict poor response to anti-VEGF treatment.
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients met inclusion criteria. There were 14 nonresponders and 9 responders. The ROC curve analysis found that the maximal sensitivity and specificity in correctly identifying responders to anti-VEGF therapy was those with >25% reduction in CRT 1 month after 1 anti-VEGF treatment (sensitivity 0.89, specificity 0.79, area under the curve 0.93). After IDI placement, anti-VEGF nonresponders showed significant improvement in visual acuity (VA) (p = 0.02) and CRT (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with macular edema secondary to RVOs, a reduction in CRT by ≤25%, 1 month after 1 anti-VEGF injection, is predictive of poor response to anti-VEGF treatment. These patients may benefit from earlier conversion to IDI treatment, which in our study, resulted in improved VA and CRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26428221     DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


  5 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacology of intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs.

Authors:  Stefano Fogli; Marzia Del Re; Eleonora Rofi; Chiara Posarelli; Michele Figus; Romano Danesi
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Anti-VEGF-Resistant Retinal Diseases: A Review of the Latest Treatment Options.

Authors:  Josh O Wallsh; Ron P Gallemore
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Intravitreal bevacizumab upregulates transthyretin in experimental branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Lasse Jørgensen Cehofski; Anders Kruse; Alexander Nørgård Alsing; Jonas Ellegaard Nielsen; Shona Pedersen; Svend Kirkeby; Bent Honoré; Henrik Vorum
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.367

Review 4.  Metabolic Dysregulation and Neurovascular Dysfunction in Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Thangal Yumnamcha; Michael Guerra; Lalit Pukhrambam Singh; Ahmed S Ibrahim
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-08

5.  Prediction of Anti-VEGF Response in Diabetic Macular Edema After 1 Injection.

Authors:  Ankoor R Shah; Yoshihiro Yonekawa; Bozho Todorich; Lily Van Laere; Rehan Hussain; Maria A Woodward; Ashkan M Abbey; Jeremy D Wolfe
Journal:  J Vitreoretin Dis       Date:  2017-02-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.