Emiel O Hoogendijk1, Bianca Suanet2, Elsa Dent3, Dorly J H Deeg4, Marja J Aartsen5. 1. Gérontopôle, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France; Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: emielhoogendijk@gmail.com. 2. Department of Sociology, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: b.a.suanet@vu.nl. 3. Centre for Population Health Research, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia. Electronic address: elsa.dent@unisa.edu.au. 4. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: djh.deeg@vumc.nl. 5. Department of Sociology, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: m.j.aartsen@vu.nl.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the association between physical frailty and social functioning among older adults, cross-sectionally and prospectively over 3 years. STUDY DESIGN: The study sample consisted of 1115 older adults aged 65 and over from two waves of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam, a population based study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frailty was measured at T1 (2005/2006) using the criteria of the frailty phenotype, which includes weight loss, weak grip strength, exhaustion, slow gait speed and low physical activity. Social functioning was assessed at T1 and T2 (2008/2009) and included social network size, instrumental support, emotional support, and loneliness. RESULTS: Cross-sectional linear regression analyses adjusted for covariates (age, sex, educational level and number of chronic diseases) showed that pre-frail and frail older adults had a smaller network size and higher levels of loneliness compared to their non-frail peers. Longitudinal linear regression analyses adjusted for covariates and baseline social functioning showed that frailty was associated with an increase in loneliness over 3 years. However, the network size and levels of social support of frail older adults did not further decline over time. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is associated with poor social functioning, and with an increase in loneliness over time. The social vulnerability of physical frail older adults should be taken into account in the care provision for frail older adults.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the association between physical frailty and social functioning among older adults, cross-sectionally and prospectively over 3 years. STUDY DESIGN: The study sample consisted of 1115 older adults aged 65 and over from two waves of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam, a population based study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frailty was measured at T1 (2005/2006) using the criteria of the frailty phenotype, which includes weight loss, weak grip strength, exhaustion, slow gait speed and low physical activity. Social functioning was assessed at T1 and T2 (2008/2009) and included social network size, instrumental support, emotional support, and loneliness. RESULTS: Cross-sectional linear regression analyses adjusted for covariates (age, sex, educational level and number of chronic diseases) showed that pre-frail and frail older adults had a smaller network size and higher levels of loneliness compared to their non-frail peers. Longitudinal linear regression analyses adjusted for covariates and baseline social functioning showed that frailty was associated with an increase in loneliness over 3 years. However, the network size and levels of social support of frail older adults did not further decline over time. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is associated with poor social functioning, and with an increase in loneliness over time. The social vulnerability of physical frail older adults should be taken into account in the care provision for frail older adults.
Authors: L Gené Huguet; M Navarro González; B Kostov; M Ortega Carmona; C Colungo Francia; M Carpallo Nieto; A Hervás Docón; R Vilarrasa Sauquet; R García Prado; A Sisó-Almirall Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Sylvie Bonin-Guillaume; Sylvie Arlotto; Alice Blin; Stéphanie Gentile Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Lily Kamalyan; Jiue-An Yang; Caitlin N Pope; Emily W Paolillo; Laura M Campbell; Bin Tang; María J Marquine; Colin A Depp; Raeanne C Moore Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Emiel O Hoogendijk; Dorly J H Deeg; Jan Poppelaars; Marleen van der Horst; Marjolein I Broese van Groenou; Hannie C Comijs; H Roeline W Pasman; Natasja M van Schoor; Bianca Suanet; Fleur Thomése; Theo G van Tilburg; Marjolein Visser; Martijn Huisman Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2016-08-20 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Barbara D'Avanzo; Rachel Shaw; Silvia Riva; Joao Apostolo; Elzbieta Bobrowicz-Campos; Donata Kurpas; Maria Bujnowska-Fedak; Carol Holland Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 3.240