Literature DB >> 26428021

Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in High-Risk Patients.

Marco Miglionico1, Fabio Mangiacapra2, Annunziata Nusca1, Domenico Scordino1, Paolo Gallo1, Marco Campanale1, Rosetta Melfi1, Germano Di Sciascio1.   

Abstract

In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a major cause of failure of percutaneous coronary intervention. The efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloon (DCB) in patients with high-risk clinical features are largely unknown. We enrolled 82 consecutive patients at high risk of bleeding with angiographically significant (diameter stenosis ≥ 50%) ISR of bare metal stent (BMS) or drug-eluting stent (DES), treated with paclitaxel-coated balloon. All patients presented at least one of the following criteria: high bleeding risk, neoplasm, chronic inflammatory disease, and need for noncardiac surgery. Dual antiplatelet therapy was indicated for 4 weeks after the procedure. At angiographic follow-up, overall late lumen loss was 0.24 ± 0.32 mm, with no significant difference between BMS-ISR and DES-ISR (0.25 ± 0.35 vs 0.22 ± 0.30 mm, p = 0.714). The Kaplan-Meier estimate for major adverse clinical events-free survival at 3 years was 81.4% (82.3% in BMS-ISR vs 79.4% in DES-ISR, log-rank p = 0.866). No stent thrombosis has been recorded. In conclusion, the use of paclitaxel-coated balloon seems to be associated with favorable outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for BMS-ISR or DES-ISR in patients with high-risk clinical features and could be considered as a reasonable option in the presence of systemic co-morbidities and contraindications to long-term dual antiplatelet therapy.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26428021     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.08.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  Drug-eluting stent restenosis treatment: an "old" stent, a "new" balloon or a "newer" scaffold?

Authors:  Dario Buccheri; Giuliana Cimino
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Endovascular recanalisation with drug coated balloon for chronic symptomatic middle cerebral artery total occlusion.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Xiao Zhang; Jin-Ping Zhang; Ju Han
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-03-15

Review 3.  Application of drug-coated balloon in coronary artery intervention: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Lei Gao; Yun-Dai Chen
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.327

4.  Comparison of the safety and efficacy of two types of drug-eluting balloons (RESTORE DEB and SeQuent® Please) in the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (RESTORE ISR China).

Authors:  Lei Gao; Qin Qin; Shao-Liang Chen; Hui Chen; Le-Feng Wang; Ze-Ning Jin; Hui Li; Jun Zhang; Jian-An Wang; Yang Zheng; Guo-Sheng Fu; Yun-Dai Chen
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  The effectiveness and safety of the RESTORE® drug-eluting balloon versus a drug-eluting stent for small coronary vessel disease: study protocol for a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Yi-Da Tang; Shu-Bin Qiao; Xi Su; Yun-Dai Chen; Ze-Ning Jin; Hui Chen; Biao Xu; Xiang-Qing Kong; Wen-Yue Pang; Yong Liu; Zai-Xin Yu; Xue Li; Hui Li; Yan-Yan Zhao; Wei Li; Jian Tian; Chang-Dong Guan; Bo Xu; Run-Lin Gao
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.327

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.