| Literature DB >> 26426695 |
Aurélie Deroy1, Fanny Saiag1, Zineb Kebbi-Benkeder2, Nassim Touahri2, Arnaud Hecker1, Mélanie Morel-Rouhier1, Francis Colin3, Stephane Dumarcay4, Philippe Gérardin4, Eric Gelhaye1.
Abstract
White-rot fungi possess the unique ability to degrade and mineralize all the different components of wood. In other respects, wood durability, among other factors, is due to the presence of extractives that are potential antimicrobial molecules. To cope with these molecules, wood decay fungi have developed a complex detoxification network including glutathione transferases (GST). The interactions between GSTs from two white-rot fungi, Trametes versicolor and Phanerochaete chrysosporium, and an environmental library of wood extracts have been studied. The results demonstrate that the specificity of these interactions is closely related to the chemical composition of the extracts in accordance with the tree species and their localization inside the wood (sapwood vs heartwood vs knotwood). These data suggest that the fungal GSTome could reflect the chemical environment encountered by these fungi during wood degradation and could be a way to study their adaptation to their way of life.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26426695 PMCID: PMC4591263 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Main compounds and relative composition of stemwood and knotwood acetone extracts.
| Fatty Acids | Gallic Acids | Resin Acids | Sugars | Others | Unidentifie Flavonoids | Catechin | Taxifolin | Sakuranin | Naringenin | Dihydrochrysin | Others Lignans | Secoisolariciresinol | Matairesinol | Unidentified | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 6.3 | 93.7 | |||||||||||||
|
| 29.9 | 16.9 | 53.2 | ||||||||||||
|
| 73.4 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 23.9 | |||||||||||
|
| 11.2 | 63.3 | 5.2 | 20.3 | |||||||||||
|
| 4.9 | 18.8 | 24.3 | 29 | 23.0 | ||||||||||
|
| 2.7 | 1.8 | 4.0 | 22.7 | 2.9 | 12.5 | 40.7 | 12.7 | |||||||
|
| 5.7 | 8.5 | 12.1 | 51.8 | 21.9 | ||||||||||
|
| 8.3 | 26.6 | 47.5 | 17.6 | |||||||||||
|
| 6.6 | 0.2 | 30.7 | 33.6 | 28.9 | ||||||||||
|
| 60.5 | 24.7 | 6.4 | 1.6 | 6.8 | ||||||||||
|
| 0.8 | 94.3 | 4.3 | 0.6 | |||||||||||
|
| 20.8 | 79.2 | |||||||||||||
|
| 56.3 | 43.7 | |||||||||||||
|
| 83.9 | 13.2 | 2.9 | ||||||||||||
|
| 97.1 | 2.9 | |||||||||||||
|
| 6.9 | 10.5 | 16.1 | 5.6 | 52 | 8.9 | |||||||||
|
| 74.4 | 24.2 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||
|
| 4.5 | 37.6 | 57.9 | ||||||||||||
|
| 1.3 | 15.5 | 5.3 | 1.2 | 60.9 | 15.8 | |||||||||
|
| 14.4 | 59.3 | 6.6 | 19.7 | |||||||||||
|
| 4.0 | 1.2 | 4.2 | 45.3 | 14 | 22.5 | 8.8 | ||||||||
|
| 7.7 | 38 | 5.4 | 30.3 | 11 | 7.6 | |||||||||
|
| 2.9 | 55.2 | 22.5 | 19.4 | |||||||||||
|
| 90.1 | 9.9 | |||||||||||||
|
| 96.4 | 2.3 | 1.3 |
a Global means.
b Mixed knots means that living and dead knots were mixed when ground and extracted
Fig 1Effects of larch acetonic extracts on the catalytic activity (A) and thermal stability (B) of TvGSTO-1S.
The catalytic activity was monitored following the cleavage of CMFDA by fluorescence as described in materials and methods section. DMSO or the tested extracts have been added after 10 min. For the thermal stability, the first derivatives of the raw data are shown allowing to determinate the Tm. diamond: DMSO (control); square: larch sapwood; triangle: larch heartwood
Fig 2Principal component analysis plot showing the distribution of six GST Omega (GSTO) from Trametes versicolor and five Ure2p from Phanerochaete chrysosporium.
A matrix based on the interactions, measured using the fluorescence-based thermal stability assay (squares) and the competition experiments (circle), between 60 wood extracts and these tested GSTs was used as input.
Fig 3Principal component analysis plot showing the distribution of acetonic extractives from tested hardwood.
A matrix based on the interactions between the six studied TvGSTO and these extractives determined using the fluorescence-based thermal stability assay and the competition experiments was used as input
Fig 4Principal component analysis plot showing the distribution of acetonic extractives of the group B defined in Fig 3.
This group B is a chemically similar group of extractives based on major functional categorizations of chemicals found in the extracts. A matrix based on the interactions between the six studied TvGSTO and the five studied PcUre2p and these extractives determined using the fluorescence-based thermal stability assay and the competition experiments was used as input