Literature DB >> 26426308

Spatial predictions at the community level: from current approaches to future frameworks.

Manuela D'Amen1, Carsten Rahbek2, Niklaus E Zimmermann3, Antoine Guisan1,4.   

Abstract

A fundamental goal of ecological research is to understand and model how processes generate patterns so that if conditions change, changes in the patterns can be predicted. Different approaches have been proposed for modelling species assemblage, but their use to predict spatial patterns of species richness and other community attributes over a range of spatial and temporal scales remains challenging. Different methods emphasize different processes of structuring communities and different goals. In this review, we focus on models that were developed for generating spatially explicit predictions of communities, with a particular focus on species richness, composition, relative abundance and related attributes. We first briefly describe the concepts and theories that span the different drivers of species assembly. A combination of abiotic processes and biotic mechanisms are thought to influence the community assembly process. In this review, we describe four categories of drivers: (i) historical and evolutionary, (ii) environmental, (iii) biotic, and (iv) stochastic. We discuss the different modelling approaches proposed or applied at the community level and examine them from different standpoints, i.e. the theoretical bases, the drivers included, the source data, and the expected outputs, with special emphasis on conservation needs under climate change. We also highlight the most promising novelties, possible shortcomings, and potential extensions of existing methods. Finally, we present new approaches to model and predict species assemblages by reviewing promising 'integrative frameworks' and views that seek to incorporate all drivers of community assembly into a unique modelling workflow. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these new solutions and how they may hasten progress in community-level modelling.
© 2015 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Keywords:  biotic interactions; dispersal; environmental filter; evolutionary forces; modelling framework; species pool; stochasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26426308     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  10 in total

1.  Controlled comparison of species- and community-level models across novel climates and communities.

Authors:  Kaitlin C Maguire; Diego Nieto-Lugilde; Jessica L Blois; Matthew C Fitzpatrick; John W Williams; Simon Ferrier; David J Lorenz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Biodiversity may wax or wane depending on metrics or taxa.

Authors:  Nigel G Yoccoz; Kari E Ellingsen; Torkild Tveraa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Do priority effects outweigh environmental filtering in a guild of dominant freshwater macroinvertebrates?

Authors:  Chelsea J Little; Florian Altermatt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Biodiversity Models: What If Unsaturation Is the Rule?

Authors:  Rubén G Mateo; Karel Mokany; Antoine Guisan
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Dynamic and diverse amphibian assemblages: Can we differentiate natural processes from human induced changes?

Authors:  Nathália G S Lima; Ubirajara Oliveira; Rafael C C Souza; Paula C Eterovick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Computationally efficient joint species distribution modeling of big spatial data.

Authors:  Gleb Tikhonov; Li Duan; Nerea Abrego; Graeme Newell; Matt White; David Dunson; Otso Ovaskainen
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Predicting spatial patterns of soil bacteria under current and future environmental conditions.

Authors:  Heidi K Mod; Aline Buri; Erika Yashiro; Nicolas Guex; Lucie Malard; Eric Pinto-Figueroa; Marco Pagni; Hélène Niculita-Hirzel; Jan Roelof van der Meer; Antoine Guisan
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 11.217

8.  Climate change may induce connectivity loss and mountaintop extinction in Central American forests.

Authors:  Lukas Baumbach; Dan L Warren; Rasoul Yousefpour; Marc Hanewinkel
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-07-15

9.  Improving prediction of rare species' distribution from community data.

Authors:  Chongliang Zhang; Yong Chen; Binduo Xu; Ying Xue; Yiping Ren
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Joint species distribution modelling with the r-package Hmsc.

Authors:  Gleb Tikhonov; Øystein H Opedal; Nerea Abrego; Aleksi Lehikoinen; Melinda M J de Jonge; Jari Oksanen; Otso Ovaskainen
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 7.781

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.