| Literature DB >> 26425922 |
Márcia Marília Gomes Dantas1, Érika Dantas Medeiros Rocha1, Naira Josele Neves Brito1, Camila Xavier Alves1, Mardone Cavalcante França2, Maria das Graças Almeida3, José Brandão-Neto4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of abnormal nutritional status has increased in children and adolescents. Nutritional assessment is important for monitoring the health and nutritional status. Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) combines changes in tissue hydration and structure and body composition that can be assessed.Entities:
Keywords: bioelectrical impedance vector analysis; body composition; children; zinc supplementation
Year: 2015 PMID: 26425922 PMCID: PMC4590407 DOI: 10.3402/fnr.v59.28918
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Nutr Res ISSN: 1654-661X Impact factor: 3.894
Results of body composition obtained in the control (CG, n=29) and experimental (EG, n=31) groups before and after placebo or oral zinc supplementation in prepubertal and healthy children
| CG-before vs. CG-after | CG-before vs. EG-before | CG-before vs. EG-after | CG-after vs. EG-before | CG-after vs. EG-after | EG-before vs. EG-after | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI-for-age (kg/m2) | ||||||
| Mean difference | −0.1966 | −0.08854 | −0.4982 | 0.1080 | −0.3017 | −0.4097 |
| 95% CI of difference | −1.444 to 1.051 | −1.316 to 1.139 | −1.726 to 0.729 | −1.119 to 1.335 | −1.529 to 0.925 | −1.617 to 0.797 |
| Significance | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
|
|
| ||||||
| Mean difference | −1.098 | 1.905 | 10.30 | 3.002 | 11.40 | 8.398 |
| 95% CI of difference | −53.10 to 50.90 | −49.25 to 53.06 | −40.85 to 61.45 | −48.15 to 54.15 | −39.75 to 62.55 | −41.89 to 58.69 |
| Significance | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
|
| ||||||
| Mean difference | −0.5828 | 1.163 | 0.7157 | 1.746 | 1.298 | −0.4474 |
| 95% CI of difference | −5.614 to 4.448 | −3.786 to 6.112 | −4.234 to 5.665 | −3.203 to 6.695 | −3.651 to 6.248 | −5.313 to 4.419 |
| Significance | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
BMI, body mass index; R, resistance; H, height; Xc, reactance. NS, not significant (p>0.05) and significant (p=0.005), using Tukey's multiple comparisons test.
Fig. 1The 95% confidence ellipses of impedance vectors measured by the difference between before and after placebo (control group) and before and after zinc supplementation (experimental group).
Fig. 2Distribution of impedance vectors with the 50, 75, and 95% tolerance ellipses for (A) the control group before placebo, (B) the control group after placebo, (C) the experimental group before zinc supplementation, and (D) the experimental group after zinc supplementation. R/H, resistance/length; Xc/H, reactance/length.
Fig. 3Serum zinc levels in the control group before placebo (CG-B) and after placebo (CG-A) and in the experimental group before zinc supplementation (EG-B) and after zinc supplementation (EG-A).