Camilla S Hanson1, Steven J Chadban, Jeremy R Chapman, Jonathan C Craig, Germaine Wong, Allison Tong. 1. 1 Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 2 Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia. 3 Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 4 Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, NSW, Westmead, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Wide variations in access to living kidney donation are apparent across transplant centers. Such disparities may be in part explained by nephrologists' beliefs and decisions about recipient eligibility. This study aims to describe nephrologists' attitudes towards recipient eligibility and access to living kidney donor transplantation. METHODS: Face-to-face semistructured interviews were conducted from June to October 2013 with 41 nephrologists from Australia and New Zealand. Transcripts were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: We identified five major themes: championing optimal recipient outcomes (maximizing recipient survival, increasing opportunity, accepting justified risks, needing control and certainty of outcomes, safeguarding psychological wellbeing), justifying donor sacrifice (confidence in reasonable utility, sparing the donor, ensuring reciprocal donor benefit), advocating for patients (being proactive and encouraging, addressing ambivalence, depending on supportive infrastructure, avoiding selective recommendations), maintaining professional boundaries (minimizing conflict of interest, respecting shared decision-making, emphasizing patient accountability, restricted decisional power, protecting unit interests), and entrenched inequities (exclusivity of living donors, inherently advantaging self-advocates, navigating language barriers, increasing center transparency, inevitable geographical disadvantage, understanding cultural barriers). CONCLUSIONS: Nephrologists' decisions about recipient suitability for living donor transplantation aimed to achieve optimal recipient outcomes, but were constrained by competing priorities to ensure reasonable utility derived from the donor kidney and protect the integrity of the transplant program. Comprehensive guidelines that provide explicit recommendations for complex medical and psychosocial risk factors might promote more equitable and transparent decision-making. Psychosocial support and culturally sensitive educational resources are needed to help nephrologists advocate for disadvantaged patients and address disparities in access to living kidney donor transplantation.
BACKGROUND: Wide variations in access to living kidney donation are apparent across transplant centers. Such disparities may be in part explained by nephrologists' beliefs and decisions about recipient eligibility. This study aims to describe nephrologists' attitudes towards recipient eligibility and access to living kidney donor transplantation. METHODS: Face-to-face semistructured interviews were conducted from June to October 2013 with 41 nephrologists from Australia and New Zealand. Transcripts were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: We identified five major themes: championing optimal recipient outcomes (maximizing recipient survival, increasing opportunity, accepting justified risks, needing control and certainty of outcomes, safeguarding psychological wellbeing), justifying donor sacrifice (confidence in reasonable utility, sparing the donor, ensuring reciprocal donor benefit), advocating for patients (being proactive and encouraging, addressing ambivalence, depending on supportive infrastructure, avoiding selective recommendations), maintaining professional boundaries (minimizing conflict of interest, respecting shared decision-making, emphasizing patient accountability, restricted decisional power, protecting unit interests), and entrenched inequities (exclusivity of living donors, inherently advantaging self-advocates, navigating language barriers, increasing center transparency, inevitable geographical disadvantage, understanding cultural barriers). CONCLUSIONS: Nephrologists' decisions about recipient suitability for living donor transplantation aimed to achieve optimal recipient outcomes, but were constrained by competing priorities to ensure reasonable utility derived from the donor kidney and protect the integrity of the transplant program. Comprehensive guidelines that provide explicit recommendations for complex medical and psychosocial risk factors might promote more equitable and transparent decision-making. Psychosocial support and culturally sensitive educational resources are needed to help nephrologists advocate for disadvantaged patients and address disparities in access to living kidney donor transplantation.
Authors: Steven Habbous; Lianne Barnieh; Kenneth Litchfield; Susan McKenzie; Marian Reich; Ngan N Lam; Istvan Mucsi; Ann Bugeja; Seychelle Yohanna; Rahul Mainra; Kate Chong; Daniel Fantus; G V Ramesh Prasad; Christine Dipchand; Jagbir Gill; Leah Getchell; Amit X Garg Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Katja Kloss; Sohal Ismail; Steef Redeker; Lothar van Hoogdalem; Annemarie Luchtenburg; Jan J V Busschbach; Jacqueline van de Wetering Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Rachel E Patzer; Laura McPherson; Nakeva Redmond; Derek DuBay; Carlos Zayas; Erica Hartmann; Laura Mulloy; Jennie Perryman; Stephen Pastan; Kimberly Jacob Arriola Journal: Kidney Int Rep Date: 2019-05-31
Authors: Raymond Vanholder; Beatriz Domínguez-Gil; Mirela Busic; Helena Cortez-Pinto; Jonathan C Craig; Kitty J Jager; Beatriz Mahillo; Vianda S Stel; Maria O Valentin; Carmine Zoccali; Gabriel C Oniscu Journal: Nat Rev Nephrol Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 28.314
Authors: Nicole Jane Scholes-Robertson; Talia Gutman; Martin Howell; Jonathan Craig; Rachel Chalmers; Karen M Dwyer; Matthew Jose; Ieyesha Roberts; Allison Tong Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Shaifali Sandal; Kathleen Charlebois; Julio F Fiore; David Kenneth Wright; Marie-Chantal Fortin; Liane S Feldman; Ahsan Alam; Catherine Weber Journal: Can J Kidney Health Dis Date: 2019-02-13