Literature DB >> 26425650

Immunosuppression via Tenascin-C.

Matteo Bellone1, Sara Caputo1, Elena Jachetti1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer stem cell; immunosuppression; metastasis; prostate cancer; tenascin-c

Year:  2015        PMID: 26425650      PMCID: PMC4580052          DOI: 10.18632/oncoscience.210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoscience        ISSN: 2331-4737


× No keyword cloud information.
Metastasis accounts for most of the prostate cancer-related deaths, and the presence of more than two metastatic lymph nodes at radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node (PLN) dissection is an independent predictor of prostate cancer specific mortality [1], thus suggesting that PLN invasion is an important event in the history of the disease. However, despite its clinical significance, little is known about the mechanisms favoring dissemination and survival of cancer cells at sites of future metastasis. This is particularly intriguing for cancer cells invading lymph nodes, where both innate and adaptive immunity should rapidly recognize and eliminate disseminated cells. Another biological conundrum is when in the history of prostate cancer, a neoplastic cell detaches from the primary lesion and seeds the metastatic niche. Indeed, even patients affected by less aggressive prostate cancer may harbor occult lymph node metastasis, which might remain quiescent and shielded from immune surveillance for years before growing and becoming clinically relevant. Quiescence and immune evasion are characteristics of stem cells, and cancer cells with stem cell properties have been implicated in early metastatic dissemination [2]. Thus, we hypothesized that cancer stem-like cells (CSC) both at primary and metastatic sites possess mechanisms of immune evasion. We investigated this biological issue in transgenic adenocarcinoma of the mouse prostate (TRAMP) mice that express the SV40 early genes (large and small T antigens; Tag) under the control of the probasin regulatory element selectively in the prostate epithelium. Indeed, androgen-promoted expression of Tag at puberty leads to prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN; week 6-12) that invariably progresses to adenocarcinoma (week 12-18). PLN metastases from adenocarcinoma are infrequent in TRAMP mice, and in our cohort of more than 100 mice they occurred after week 17. Utilizing the sphere assay, we established long-term prostate CSC lines from unsorted prostate cells obtained from different stages of TRAMP progression [3]. CSC were endowed with self-renewal, multipotency, and tumorigenicity capacities. Transcriptome analysis showed that genes upregulated in each stage-specific prostate CSC were significantly associated with distinct clinical subgroups of prostate cancer patients, thus indicating that mouse CSC may define human prostate cancer progression signatures [3]. Although CSC obtained from PIN lesions (hereafter named TPIN-SC) were killed in vitro by NK cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes, they generated tumors when injected in immunocompetent mice [4], thus suggesting they possess mechanisms of immune evasion. Curiously, CSC phenotypically and functionally identical to TPIN-SC were obtained from histopathologically negative PLN (hereafter named TLN-SC) of TRAMP mice at about 10-12 weeks of age [5], thus demonstrating that lymph node invasion can already occur at the stage of PIN in TRAMP mice. Concomitantly, at that stage TRAMP mice develop full cytotoxic T cell tolerance to Tag [6], which behaves in this model as a tissue-restricted tumor associated antigen. Both in vitro and in vivo TPIN-SC and TLN-SC, and not CSC obtained from frank prostate tumors, used Tenascin-C (TNC), an extracellular matrix protein of stem cell niches [7], to interact with α5β1 integrin on the cell surface of both human and murine T cells, thus inhibiting T cell receptor-dependent activation, proliferation and cytokine production [5]. Moreover, we found that TNC was expressed in the extracellular matrix and in the acinar basement membrane in both normal human and TRAMP prostate and low-grade PIN, its expression increased in high-grade PIN, returned to basal levels in prostate adenocarcinoma, and it was again overexpressed in lymph node metastases [5]. All together, these findings strongly support the role of TNC in the early phases of disease progression, likely fostering generation of the metastatic niche [7], and protecting disseminated CSC from immune surveillance. Thus, targeting TNC at the stage of high-grade PIN, and in low-risk prostate cancer patients (i.e., those with Gleason scores ≤ 6, PSA concentrations <10 ng/mL, or T1-T2a; Figure 1) might prevent metastasis occurrence.
Figure 1

Prostate cancer stem-like cells early migrate to prostate draining lymph nodes through the CXCR4-CXCL12 axis, and dampen T cell responses with Tenascin-C

Already at the stage of PIN, prostate CSC are attracted to PLN by a CXCL12 gradient. Both at the primary site and in the metastatic niche CSC use TNC to overcome immune surveillance. Drugs that either block the CXCR4-CXCL12 or the TNC-α5β1 axes could reduce metastasis occurrence.

Prostate cancer stem-like cells early migrate to prostate draining lymph nodes through the CXCR4-CXCL12 axis, and dampen T cell responses with Tenascin-C

Already at the stage of PIN, prostate CSC are attracted to PLN by a CXCL12 gradient. Both at the primary site and in the metastatic niche CSC use TNC to overcome immune surveillance. Drugs that either block the CXCR4-CXCL12 or the TNC-α5β1 axes could reduce metastasis occurrence. TPIN-SC and TLN-SC also expressed CXCR4 and migrated in response to its ligand CXCL12, which was overexpressed in PLN upon PIN development. Interestingly, in vivo administration of AMD-3100, a CXCR4 inhibitor, prevented establishment in PLN of an immunosuppressive microenvironment [Figure 1; ref. 5], suggesting this as an alternative strategy to prevent CSC dissemination and metastasis. Although a recent study also involving low-risk prostate cancer patients confirmed a significant reduction in the rate of death and the risk of metastases in the radical prostatectomy group as compared with the watchful-waiting group [8], overtreatment remains high, and still debated is who among low-risk patients will benefit most from radical prostatectomy. Based on what we have found in the TRAMP model and in human samples [5], we propose that besides DNA signatures, criteria of local immune suppression (e.g., expression of TNC) and precocious PLN dissemination (e.g., expression of CXCL12 and/or TNC) should be investigated as predictors of prostate cancer specific mortality.
  8 in total

1.  Breast cancer cells produce tenascin C as a metastatic niche component to colonize the lungs.

Authors:  Thordur Oskarsson; Swarnali Acharyya; Xiang H-F Zhang; Sakari Vanharanta; Sohail F Tavazoie; Patrick G Morris; Robert J Downey; Katia Manova-Todorova; Edi Brogi; Joan Massagué
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Gene signatures distinguish stage-specific prostate cancer stem cells isolated from transgenic adenocarcinoma of the mouse prostate lesions and predict the malignancy of human tumors.

Authors:  Stefania Mazzoleni; Elena Jachetti; Sara Morosini; Matteo Grioni; Ignazio Stefano Piras; Mauro Pala; Alessandro Bulfone; Massimo Freschi; Matteo Bellone; Rossella Galli
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 3.  Prostate cancer, tumor immunity and a renewed sense of optimism in immunotherapy.

Authors:  Nicolò Rigamonti; Matteo Bellone
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 6.968

4.  Tenascin-C Protects Cancer Stem-like Cells from Immune Surveillance by Arresting T-cell Activation.

Authors:  Elena Jachetti; Sara Caputo; Stefania Mazzoleni; Chiara Svetlana Brambillasca; Sara Martina Parigi; Matteo Grioni; Ignazio Stefano Piras; Umberto Restuccia; Arianna Calcinotto; Massimo Freschi; Angela Bachi; Rossella Galli; Matteo Bellone
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Mirja Ruutu; Hans Garmo; Jennifer R Stark; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Stefan Bratell; Anders Spångberg; Juni Palmgren; Gunnar Steineck; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Two positive nodes represent a significant cut-off value for cancer specific survival in patients with node positive prostate cancer. A new proposal based on a two-institution experience on 703 consecutive N+ patients treated with radical prostatectomy, extended pelvic lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Jeffrey R Karnes; Luigi Filippo Da Pozzo; Cesare Cozzarini; Andrea Gallina; Nazareno Suardi; Marco Bianchi; Massimo Freschi; Claudio Doglioni; Ferruccio Fazio; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Michael L Blute
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  EMT and dissemination precede pancreatic tumor formation.

Authors:  Andrew D Rhim; Emily T Mirek; Nicole M Aiello; Anirban Maitra; Jennifer M Bailey; Florencia McAllister; Maximilian Reichert; Gregory L Beatty; Anil K Rustgi; Robert H Vonderheide; Steven D Leach; Ben Z Stanger
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Prostate cancer stem cells are targets of both innate and adaptive immunity and elicit tumor-specific immune responses.

Authors:  Elena Jachetti; Stefania Mazzoleni; Matteo Grioni; Alessia Ricupito; Chiara Brambillasca; Luca Generoso; Arianna Calcinotto; Massimo Freschi; Anna Mondino; Rossella Galli; Matteo Bellone
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 8.110

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  MicroRNA signature in the chemoprevention of functionally-enriched stem and progenitor pools (FESPP) by Active Hexose Correlated Compound (AHCC).

Authors:  Émilie A Graham; Jean-François Mallet; Majed Jambi; Hiroshi Nishioka; Kohei Homma; Chantal Matar
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.742

2.  Novel Human Tenascin-C Function-Blocking Camel Single Domain Nanobodies.

Authors:  Sayda Dhaouadi; Rahma Ben Abderrazek; Thomas Loustau; Chérine Abou-Faycal; Ayoub Ksouri; William Erne; Devadarssen Murdamoothoo; Matthias Mörgelin; Andreas Kungl; Alain Jung; Sonia Ledrappier; Zakaria Benlasfar; Sandrine Bichet; Ruth Chiquet-Ehrismann; Ismaïl Hendaoui; Gertraud Orend; Balkiss Bouhaouala-Zahar
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Galectin-3 in Prostate Cancer Stem-Like Cells Is Immunosuppressive and Drives Early Metastasis.

Authors:  Sara Caputo; Matteo Grioni; Chiara S Brambillasca; Antonella Monno; Arianna Brevi; Massimo Freschi; Ignazio S Piras; Angela R Elia; Valentina Pieri; Tania Baccega; Angelo Lombardo; Rossella Galli; Alberto Briganti; Claudio Doglioni; Elena Jachetti; Matteo Bellone
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 7.561

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.