| Literature DB >> 26425430 |
Li-Wei Liu1, Si-Yi Hu1, Yin-Ping Dou2, Tian-Hang Liu2, Jing-Quan Lin2, Yue Wang1.
Abstract
This study investigates near-infrared region Ag2S quantum dots (QDs) and their nonlinear optical response under 532 nm nanosecond laser pulses. Our experimental result shows that nonlinear transmission is reduced from 0.084 to 0.04. The observed narrowing behavior of the output pulse width shows superior optical limiting. We discuss the physical mechanisms responsible for the nonlinear optical response of the QDs. The average size of the nanocrystals was 5.5 nm. Our results suggest the possibility of using these Ag2S QDs for photoelectric, biosensor, optical ranging, and self-adaptive technologies.Entities:
Keywords: nonlinear optics; quantum dots; silver sulfide (Ag2S); strong absorption
Year: 2015 PMID: 26425430 PMCID: PMC4578410 DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.6.182
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Nanotechnol ISSN: 2190-4286 Impact factor: 3.649
Figure 1(a) Absorption spectra of Ag2S QDs in chloroform, the TEM image of Ag2S QDs is shown in the inset. (b) EDS spectra of Ag2S QDs.
Figure 2Simulation model (a) and result (b).
Simulation parameters.
| name | value | description |
| ω0 | 2 [μm] | minimum waist |
| λ0 | 532 [nm] | laser wavelength |
| E | 30 [kV/m] | peak electric field |
| π·ω02/λ0 | Rayleigh range | |
| 2π/λ0 | propagation constant | |
| ω0 | Angular frequency | |
| 8.9 [ns] | pulse width | |
Figure 3Experimental setup.
Figure 4(a) Open-aperture Z-scan graph of Ag2S QDs; (b) closed-aperture Z-scan graph of Ag2S QDs.
Fitted nonlinear optical parameter of Ag2S QDs for open-aperture Z-scans.a
| laser energy (mJ) | linear absorption coefficient α (cm−1) | estimated size (nm) | absorption coefficient β2 (×10−3 cm/GW) | cross section σ2 (×104 GW) |
| 25 | 0.32 | 5.2 | 1.889 | 3.899 |
| 35 | 0.23 | 5.2 | 0.686 | 1.416 |
| 45 | 0.16 | 5.2 | 0.376 | 0.775 |
aAll values listed have an estimated error of 15%.
Fitted nonlinear optical parameter of Ag2S QDs for closed-aperture Z-scans.a
| laser energy (mJ) | linear absorption coefficient α (cm−1) | estimated size (nm) | absorption coefficient β2 (×10−3 cm/GW) | cross section σ2 (×104 GW) |
| 25 | 0.32 | 5.2 | 1.193 | 2.462 |
| 35 | 0.23 | 5.2 | 0.305 | 0.629 |
| 45 | 0.16 | 5.2 | 0.095 | 0.195 |
aAll values listed have an estimated error of 15%.
Figure 5Measured nonlinear transmission versus the input pulse energy for Ag2S QDs. The dashed line represents the best fitting curve based on Equation 3 with β = constant.
Figure 6(a) Normalized waveforms of laser pulse and transmission pulse at the same pump energy level; (b) normalized waveforms of transmission pulse of Ag2S quantum dots showing width curve at different pump energy.
Figure 7Absorption intensity and input pump energy spectra of Ag2S.