| Literature DB >> 26425364 |
Hanan S El-Mekawy1, Abeer M ElDeeb1, Hassan O Ghareib2.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of laser acupuncture combined with a diet-exercise intervention on features of the metabolic syndrome (MetS). Twenty-eight obese post-menopausal women were randomly distributed to the control and laser acupuncture group. The control group received the diet-exercise intervention and the study group received the same intervention and sessions of laser acupuncture, 3 times/week for 12 weeks. Anthropometric measurement, fasting blood glucose and insulin levels, homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and lipid profile were assessed before and after the treatment course. Both groups showed a significant decrease in the anthropometric and metabolic parameters. However, laser acupuncture group showed a greater decrease in the waist (P = 0.001) and hip (P = 0.001) circumferences, cholesterol (P = 0.04), and insulin levels (P = 0.043) than the control group. These results suggest that laser acupuncture is a valuable approach that could be added to the diet-exercise intervention to correct features of the MetS.Entities:
Keywords: Laser acupuncture; Metabolic syndrome; Obesity; Post-menopause
Year: 2014 PMID: 26425364 PMCID: PMC4563594 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2014.08.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 10.479
Baseline characteristics of the post-menopausal women.
| Variable | Control group ( | Laser acupuncture group ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (Yrs) | 52.78 ± 4.62 | 54.43 ± 4.38 | 0.34 |
| Height (cm) | 161 ± 4.17 | 160.57 ± 3.46 | 0.77 |
| Weight (kg) | 110.89 ± 14.14 | 102.96 ± 10.03 | 0.10 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
* p < 0.05 = significant; ** p < 0.01 = highly significant.
p > 0.05 = non-significant.
Comparison between different variables measured pre- and post-treatment in the two studied groups.
| Control group ( | Laser acupuncture group ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-treatment | Post-treatment | Pre-treatment | Post-treatment | |||
| Weight (kg) | 110.89 ± 14.14 | 100.32 ± 12.98 | 0.001 | 102.96 ± 10.03 | 91.68 ± 9.60 | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 42.78 ± 5.27 | 38.70 ± 4.88 | 0.001 | 39.91 ± 3.43 | 35.54 ± 3.37 | <0.001 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 121.43 ± 11.24 | 110.57 ± 10.90 | 0.001 | 120.86 ± 11.20 | 104.64 ± 8.50 | <0.001 |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 127.14 ± 11.05 | 115.43 ± 11.06 | 0.001 | 126.79 ± 11.44 | 110.64 ± 9.38 | <0.001 |
| Waist-hip ratio | 0.95 ± 0.02 | 0.95 ± 0.02 | 0.765 | 0.95 ± 0.02 | 0.94 ± 0.02 | 0.016 |
| TC (mg/dl) | 205.71 ± 21.83 | 187.86 ± 21.73 | 0.001 | 211.93 ± 27.95 | 187.43 ± 25.48 | <0.001 |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 132.64 ± 23.38 | 124.14 ± 19.27 | 0.003 | 134.79 ± 24.97 | 122.21 ± 21.05 | 0.002 |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 42.07 ± 3.02 | 43.07 ± 3.15 | 0.012 | 42.00 ± 2.80 | 43.50 ± 2.85 | 0.003 |
| TG (mg/dl) | 156.79 ± 43.31 | 122.86 ± 34.35 | 0.0014 | 158.14 ± 39.41 | 119.21 ± 38.28 | <0.001 |
| Fasting blood glucose (mg/dl) | 107.93 ± 13.97 | 100.28 ± 11.27 | 0.002 | 111.50 ± 22.35 | 100.86 ± 11.06 | 0.003 |
| Serum insulin (mU/l) | 10.33 ± 4.77 | 8.60 ± 4.88 | 0.03 | 13.33 ± 8.42 | 9.31 ± 8.32 | 0.004 |
| HOMA-IR | 2.85 ± 1.20 | 2.18 ± 1.33 | 0.013 | 3.80 ± 3.01 | 2.59 ± 2.26 | 0.011 |
TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance.
Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
* & ** Relative to comparison within the same group.
Non-parametric statistics was performed.
p > 0.05 = non-significant.
p < 0.05 = significant.
p < 0.01 = highly significant.
Comparison between values of the mean difference of different variables in the two studied groups.
| Control group ( | Laser acupuncture group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (kg) | 10.57 ± 1.41 | 11.29 ± 3.07 | 0.437 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 4.07 ± 0.51 | 4.38 ± 1.15 | 0.376 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 10.86 ± 2.11 | 16.21 ± 3.36 | 0.001 |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 11.71 ± 2.95 | 16.14 ± 3.42 | 0.001 |
| Waist-hip ratio | 0.001 ± 0.017 | 0.010 ± 0.014 | 0.159 |
| TC (mg/dl) | 17.86 ± 6.42 | 24.50 ± 9.53 | 0.040 |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 8.50 ± 8.79 | 12.57 ± 12.32 | 0.323 |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | −1.00 ± 1.11 | −1.50 ± 1.34 | 0.473 |
| TG (mg/dl) | 33.93 ± 31.33 | 38.93 ± 31.65 | 0.678 |
| Fasting blood glucose (mg/dl) | 7.64 ± 7.57 | 10.64 ± 13.65 | 0.679 |
| Serum insulin (mU/l) | 1.73 ± 2.14 | 4.01 ± 3.75 | 0.043 |
| HOMA-IR | 0.67 ± 0.78 | 1.22 ± 1.47 | 0.260 |
TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance.
Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
Non-parametric statistics was performed.
p > 0.05 = non-significant.
p < 0.05 = significant.
p < 0.01 = highly significant.