| Literature DB >> 26425176 |
Rym Hassani1, Mahjoub Jabli1, Yakdhane Kacem1, Jérôme Marrot2, Damien Prim2, Béchir Ben Hassine1.
Abstract
The present paper describes the synthesis of new palladium-oxazoline complexes in one step with good to high yields (68-95%). TheEntities:
Keywords: aminoalcohols; catalysis; dye decolorization; optical properties; oxazolines; palladium complexes
Year: 2015 PMID: 26425176 PMCID: PMC4578361 DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.11.132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Org Chem ISSN: 1860-5397 Impact factor: 2.883
Figure 1Structure of Eriochrome Blue Black B.
Scheme 1Cyclopalladation reactions of (S)-4-isopropyl-2-(naphthalen-1-yl)oxazoline.
Scheme 2Synthesis of cyclopalladated complex from bis-oxazoline.
Figure 2ORTEP drawing of the complex 8.
Scheme 3Synthesis of the bis(oxazoline) coordinated complexes.
Figure 3ORTEP drawing of the complex 9.
The FTIR analysis of the complexes.
| vibration | bands ν (cm−1) | |||||
| attribution | ||||||
| ν(C–H) | 2956.4 | 2954.8 | 2956.7 | 2961.7 | 2957.8 | 2963.9 |
| ν(nitrile) | – | – | – | – | – | 2250.8 |
| ν(C=N) | 1645.4 | 1641.6 | 1637.4 | 1638.2 | 1642.2 | 1635.4 |
| ν(C–N) | 1350.2 | 1355.3 | 1436.7 | 1345.7 | 1377.8 | 1545.2 |
| δ(CH3) | 1205.2 | 1210.0 | 1201.0 | – | 1200.4 | 1260.3 |
| ν(P–C) | – | – | 1094.9 | – | – | – |
| ν(C–O) | 1016.1 | 1012.9 | 1011.0 | 1023.2 | 1030.8 | 1018.8 |
| δ(C–H) | 760 | 766.2 | 692.3 | 773.6 | 776.0 | – |
| δ(Pd–N) | – | 510.9 | 513.4 | 525.2 | 573 | – |
Optical properties of the chiral complexes.
| complexes | λmax (nm) | |
| 3 | 342 | 2.67 |
| 4 | 341 | 2.50 |
| 5 | 299 | 2.34 |
| 8 | 380 | 2.72 |
| 9 | 341 | 2.57 |
| 12 | 300 | 3.21 |
Figure 4Change in color removal in the presence of different catalysts within 10 min (before filtration). T: sample which contain only the solution of dye and H2O2.
Figure 5Change in color removal in the presence of different catalysts (after filtration over 10 min).
Figure 6Evolution of the color degradation against time using Eriochrome plus H2O2, the complex plus H2O2 or the complex alone.
Figure 7Change of the concentration of the Erio solution with the variation of H2O2 dose.
Figure 8Evolution of the color removal against initial dye concentration.
Figure 9Change of the color removal versus temperature.
Calculation of the activation parameters for the dynamic process.
| Δ | Δ | Δ | |||
| 22 | 0.0167 | 82.385 | |||
| 40 | 0.0211 | 16.669 | −231.594 | 14.065 | 86.553 |
| 60 | 0.0363 | 91.185 | |||
Figure 10Recycling experiments for Erio removal (C0 = 30 ppm, 20 mL) in the presence of catalyst 9 at pH 7 and T = 22 °C.
Scheme 4Proposed mechanism of decolorization.