Literature DB >> 26424912

Hemodynamic effects of target-controlled infusion of propofol alone or in combination with a constant-rate infusion of remifentanil in dogs.

Suzane L Beier1, Cláudio R S Mattoso1, Antonio J A Aguiar1, Pedro T G Vianna1, Flavio Massone1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol alone or in combination with a constant-rate infusion (CRI) of remifentanil. Six adult dogs were given 2 treatments in a randomized crossover study with a 7-day interval between treatments. Treatment 1 was propofol (P) and treatment 2 was propofol and remifentanil (P-Rem), without any premedication. Propofol was induced using a TCI system with a predicted plasma concentration (Cp) of 6.0 μg/mL. Anesthesia was maintained within the Cp range (0.65 to 3.0 μg/mL) for 120 min and remifentanil was administered at a rate of 0.3 μg/kg body weight (BW) per minute, CRI. Cardiopulmonary variables were recorded before (baseline), during, and 120 min after drug administration. Heart rate (HR) decreased significantly in the P-Rem group (46%) compared with baseline values. In the P-Rem group, the cardiac index (CI) decreased significantly (49% to 58%) and the stroke volume (SV) decreased compared with baseline values. The systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) increased significantly in the P-Rem group compared with baseline values. There was no difference in mean arterial pressure (MAP) between the groups. Central venous pressure (CVP) and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) significantly increased in the P-Rem group compared with baseline values. In conclusion, the hemodynamic changes observed in this study indicate a compromise of the cardiovascular system, although the dogs in this study were healthy/euvolemic and there was no change in preload. More studies are required in order to evaluate the actual safety of the combination of propofol and remifentanil in patients with reduced cardiac reserve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26424912      PMCID: PMC4581676     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Vet Res        ISSN: 0830-9000            Impact factor:   1.310


  33 in total

1.  Context-sensitive half-time in multicompartment pharmacokinetic models for intravenous anesthetic drugs.

Authors:  M A Hughes; P S Glass; J R Jacobs
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Target-controlled infusion of propofol combined with variable rate infusion of remifentanil for anaesthesia of a dog with patent ductus arteriosus.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Musk; Derek A Flaherty
Journal:  Vet Anaesth Analg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.648

3.  Sympathetic responses to induction of anesthesia in humans with propofol or etomidate.

Authors:  T J Ebert; M Muzi; R Berens; D Goff; J P Kampine
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Effect of various propofol plasma concentrations on regional myocardial contractility and left ventricular afterload.

Authors:  A Coetzee; P Fourie; J Coetzee; E Badenhorst; A Rebel; C Bolliger; R Uebel; C Wium; C Lombard
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Hemodynamic effects in dogs anesthetized with isoflurane and remifentanil-isoflurane.

Authors:  Eduardo R Monteiro; Francisco J Teixeira Neto; Daniela Campagnol; Natache A Garofalo; Renata K Alvaides
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.156

6.  Minimum infusion rate and hemodynamic effects of propofol, propofol-lidocaine and propofol-lidocaine-ketamine in dogs.

Authors:  Rodrigo Mannarino; Stelio P L Luna; Eduardo R Monteiro; Suzane L Beier; Vanessa B Castro
Journal:  Vet Anaesth Analg       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 1.648

7.  Effect of remifentanil on requirements for propofol administered by use of a target-controlled infusion system for maintaining anesthesia in dogs.

Authors:  Suzane L Beier; Antonio J de Araujo Aguiar; Pedro T G Vianna; Cláudio R S Mattoso; Flavio Massone
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.156

8.  Hemodynamic effects of GI 87084B, an ultra-short acting mu-opioid analgesic, in anesthetized dogs.

Authors:  M K James; A Vuong; M K Grizzle; S V Schuster; J E Shaffer
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Effects of graded infusion rates of propofol on cardiovascular haemodynamics, coronary circulation and myocardial metabolism in dogs.

Authors:  Y Nakaigawa; S Akazawa; R Shimizu; R Ishii; R Yamato
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  A comparison of induction of anaesthesia using a target-controlled infusion device in dogs with propofol or a propofol and alfentanil admixture.

Authors:  Adam Auckburally; Pat Pawson; Derek Flaherty
Journal:  Vet Anaesth Analg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.648

View more
  1 in total

1.  Inhalation of low-dose desflurane prevents the hemodynamic instability caused by target-controlled infusion of remifentanil and propofol during laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Peng Zhao; Yunfeng Cui; Lihua Sun; Xufang Sun
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.447

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.