Jane E Carlson1, Christopher A Adams2, Kent E Holsinger3. 1. Department of Biological Sciences, Nicholls State University, P.O. Box 2021, Thibodaux, LA 70310, USA and jane.carlson@nicholls.edu. 2. Department of Biological Sciences, Nicholls State University, P.O. Box 2021, Thibodaux, LA 70310, USA and. 3. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, U-3043, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Trait-environment relationships are commonly interpreted as evidence for local adaptation in plants. However, even when selection analyses support this interpretation, the mechanisms underlying differential benefits are often unknown. This study addresses this gap in knowledge using the broadly distributed South African shrub Protea repens. Specifically, the study examines whether broad-scale patterns of trait variation are consistent with spatial differences in selection and ecophysiology in the wild. METHODS: In a common garden study of plants sourced from 19 populations, associations were measured between five morphological traits and three axes describing source climates. Trait-trait and trait-environment associations were analysed in a multi-response model. Within two focal populations in the wild, selection and path analyses were used to test associations between traits, fecundity and physiological performance. KEY RESULTS: Across 19 populations in a common garden, stomatal density increased with the source population's mean annual temperature and decreased with its average amount of rainfall in midsummer. Concordantly, selection analysis in two natural populations revealed positive selection on stomatal density at the hotter, drier site, while failing to detect selection at the cooler, moister site. Dry-site plants with high stomatal density also had higher stomatal conductances, cooler leaf temperatures and higher light-saturated photosynthetic rates than those with low stomatal density, but no such relationships were present among wet-site plants. Leaf area, stomatal pore index and specific leaf area in the garden also co-varied with climate, but within-population differences were not associated with fitness in either wild population. CONCLUSIONS: The parallel patterns of broad-scale variation, differences in selection and differences in trait-ecophysiology relationships suggest a mechanism for adaptive differentiation in stomatal density. Densely packed stomata may improve performance by increasing transpiration and cooling, but predominately in drier, hotter climates. This study uniquely shows context-dependent benefits of stomatal density--a trait rarely linked to local adaptation in plants.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Trait-environment relationships are commonly interpreted as evidence for local adaptation in plants. However, even when selection analyses support this interpretation, the mechanisms underlying differential benefits are often unknown. This study addresses this gap in knowledge using the broadly distributed South African shrub Protea repens. Specifically, the study examines whether broad-scale patterns of trait variation are consistent with spatial differences in selection and ecophysiology in the wild. METHODS: In a common garden study of plants sourced from 19 populations, associations were measured between five morphological traits and three axes describing source climates. Trait-trait and trait-environment associations were analysed in a multi-response model. Within two focal populations in the wild, selection and path analyses were used to test associations between traits, fecundity and physiological performance. KEY RESULTS: Across 19 populations in a common garden, stomatal density increased with the source population's mean annual temperature and decreased with its average amount of rainfall in midsummer. Concordantly, selection analysis in two natural populations revealed positive selection on stomatal density at the hotter, drier site, while failing to detect selection at the cooler, moister site. Dry-site plants with high stomatal density also had higher stomatal conductances, cooler leaf temperatures and higher light-saturated photosynthetic rates than those with low stomatal density, but no such relationships were present among wet-site plants. Leaf area, stomatal pore index and specific leaf area in the garden also co-varied with climate, but within-population differences were not associated with fitness in either wild population. CONCLUSIONS: The parallel patterns of broad-scale variation, differences in selection and differences in trait-ecophysiology relationships suggest a mechanism for adaptive differentiation in stomatal density. Densely packed stomata may improve performance by increasing transpiration and cooling, but predominately in drier, hotter climates. This study uniquely shows context-dependent benefits of stomatal density--a trait rarely linked to local adaptation in plants.
Authors: José M Torres-Ruiz; Antoine Kremer; Madeline R Carins Murphy; Tim Brodribb; Laurent J Lamarque; Laura Truffaut; Fabrice Bonne; Alexis Ducousso; Sylvain Delzon Journal: Tree Physiol Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 4.196
Authors: Hannes Dittberner; Arthur Korte; Tabea Mettler-Altmann; Andreas P M Weber; Grey Monroe; Juliette de Meaux Journal: Mol Ecol Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 6.185
Authors: Gisela C Stotz; Cristian Salgado-Luarte; Alonso T Vigil; Henry J De La Cruz; Víctor Pastén-Marambio; Ernesto Gianoli Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2021-04-17 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Zdravko Baruch; Alice R Jones; Kathryn E Hill; Francesca A McInerney; Colette Blyth; Stefan Caddy-Retalic; Matthew J Christmas; Nicholas J C Gellie; Andrew J Lowe; Irene Martin-Fores; Kristine E Nielson; Martin F Breed Journal: AoB Plants Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 3.276
Authors: Margaux-Alison Fustier; Natalia E Martínez-Ainsworth; Jonás A Aguirre-Liguori; Anthony Venon; Hélène Corti; Agnès Rousselet; Fabrice Dumas; Hannes Dittberner; María G Camarena; Daniel Grimanelli; Otso Ovaskainen; Matthieu Falque; Laurence Moreau; Juliette de Meaux; Salvador Montes-Hernández; Luis E Eguiarte; Yves Vigouroux; Domenica Manicacci; Maud I Tenaillon Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 5.917