Literature DB >> 26424760

Phase II Trial of Nilotinib in Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma Harboring KIT Gene Aberration: A Multicenter Trial of Korean Cancer Study Group (UN10-06).

Su Jin Lee1, Tae Min Kim2, Yu Jung Kim3, Kee-Taek Jang4, Hyo Jin Lee5, Soon Nam Lee6, Mi Sun Ahn7, In Gyu Hwang8, Suee Lee9, Moon-Hee Lee10, Jeeyun Lee11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: KIT has been suggested to be a potential therapeutic target for malignant melanoma. We evaluated the antitumor activity and safety of the KIT inhibitor nilotinib in metastatic melanoma patients harboring KIT gene mutations or amplifications.
METHODS: We conducted a phase II multicenter trial of nilotinib in metastatic malignant melanoma with KIT mutations or amplifications. Patients received 400 mg oral nilotinib twice daily. The primary endpoint was response rate, and if seven or more responders were observed from the cumulative 36 patients, nilotinib would be considered worthy of further testing in this study population.
RESULTS: Between October 2009 and June 2013, 176 patients underwent molecular screening for KIT gene aberrations, and 42 patients harboring KIT gene mutations and/or amplification were enrolled in the study. Overall, 25 (59.5%), 15 (35.7%), and 2 (4.8%) patients had KIT mutations, KIT amplifications, and both KIT mutations and amplification, respectively. Of the 42 enrolled patients, 1 patient achieved complete response, 6 patients achieved partial response, and 17 patients achieved stable disease, resulting in an overall response rate of 16.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.4%-28.0%) and a disease control rate of 57.1% (95% CI: 42.1%-72.1%). The median duration of response was 34 weeks (range: 5-55 weeks). Of the 7 responders, 6 patients had KIT mutations (exon 11: 5 patients; exon 17: 1 patient), and 1 patient had KIT amplification only.
CONCLUSION: Although this study did not meet its primary endpoint of response rate, nilotinib showed durable response in a subset of metastatic melanoma patients with specific KIT mutations. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: KIT aberration can be detected in a subset of metastatic melanoma patients. This phase II trial showed that nilotinib demonstrates durable response in a subset of patients with KIT mutations. The safety profile was very tolerable. This study suggests that a KIT inhibitor may benefit a small subset of metastatic melanoma patients with KIT mutations. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  KIT amplification; KIT mutation; Melanoma; Nilotinib

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26424760      PMCID: PMC4718426          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  26 in total

1.  Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation.

Authors:  Paul B Chapman; Axel Hauschild; Caroline Robert; John B Haanen; Paolo Ascierto; James Larkin; Reinhard Dummer; Claus Garbe; Alessandro Testori; Michele Maio; David Hogg; Paul Lorigan; Celeste Lebbe; Thomas Jouary; Dirk Schadendorf; Antoni Ribas; Steven J O'Day; Jeffrey A Sosman; John M Kirkwood; Alexander M M Eggermont; Brigitte Dreno; Keith Nolop; Jiang Li; Betty Nelson; Jeannie Hou; Richard J Lee; Keith T Flaherty; Grant A McArthur
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  V559A and N822I double KIT mutant melanoma with predictable response to imatinib?

Authors:  Kevin McDonnell; Bryan Betz; Douglas Fullen; Christopher D Lao
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 4.693

3.  Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  F Stephen Hodi; Steven J O'Day; David F McDermott; Robert W Weber; Jeffrey A Sosman; John B Haanen; Rene Gonzalez; Caroline Robert; Dirk Schadendorf; Jessica C Hassel; Wallace Akerley; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Jose Lutzky; Paul Lorigan; Julia M Vaubel; Gerald P Linette; David Hogg; Christian H Ottensmeier; Celeste Lebbé; Christian Peschel; Ian Quirt; Joseph I Clark; Jedd D Wolchok; Jeffrey S Weber; Jason Tian; Michael J Yellin; Geoffrey M Nichol; Axel Hoos; Walter J Urba
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  KIT as a therapeutic target in metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Richard D Carvajal; Cristina R Antonescu; Jedd D Wolchok; Paul B Chapman; Ruth-Ann Roman; Jerrold Teitcher; Katherine S Panageas; Klaus J Busam; Bartosz Chmielowski; Jose Lutzky; Anna C Pavlick; Anne Fusco; Lauren Cane; Naoko Takebe; Swapna Vemula; Nancy Bouvier; Boris C Bastian; Gary K Schwartz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Large-scale analysis of KIT aberrations in Chinese patients with melanoma.

Authors:  Yan Kong; Lu Si; Yanyan Zhu; Xiaowei Xu; Christopher L Corless; Keith T Flaherty; Li Li; Haifu Li; Xinan Sheng; Chuanliang Cui; Zhihong Chi; Siming Li; Mei Han; Lili Mao; Aiping Lu; Jun Guo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  KIT gene mutations and copy number in melanoma subtypes.

Authors:  Carol Beadling; Erick Jacobson-Dunlop; F Stephen Hodi; Claudia Le; Andrea Warrick; Janice Patterson; Ajia Town; Amy Harlow; Frank Cruz; Sharl Azar; Brian P Rubin; Susan Muller; Rob West; Michael C Heinrich; Christopher L Corless
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Correlation between KIT expression and KIT mutation in melanoma: a study of 173 cases with emphasis on the acral-lentiginous/mucosal type.

Authors:  Carlos A Torres-Cabala; Wei-Lien Wang; Jonathan Trent; Dan Yang; Su Chen; John Galbincea; Kevin B Kim; Scott Woodman; Michael Davies; Jose A Plaza; J W Nash; Victor G Prieto; Alexander J Lazar; Doina Ivan
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Giuseppe Saglio; Dong-Wook Kim; Surapol Issaragrisil; Philipp le Coutre; Gabriel Etienne; Clarisse Lobo; Ricardo Pasquini; Richard E Clark; Andreas Hochhaus; Timothy P Hughes; Neil Gallagher; Albert Hoenekopp; Mei Dong; Ariful Haque; Richard A Larson; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Nilotinib (formerly AMN107), a highly selective BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is effective in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase following imatinib resistance and intolerance.

Authors:  Hagop M Kantarjian; Francis Giles; Norbert Gattermann; Kapil Bhalla; Giuliana Alimena; Francesca Palandri; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Franck-Emmanuel Nicolini; Stephen G O'Brien; Mark Litzow; Ravi Bhatia; Francisco Cervantes; Ariful Haque; Yaping Shou; Debra J Resta; Aaron Weitzman; Andreas Hochhaus; Philipp le Coutre
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  [Molecular and immunohistochemical diagnostics in melanoma].

Authors:  B Schilling; K G Griewank
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Targeting the HGF/MET Axis Counters Primary Resistance to KIT Inhibition in KIT-Mutant Melanoma.

Authors:  Junna Oba; Sun-Hee Kim; Wei-Lien Wang; Mariana P Macedo; Fernando Carapeto; Meredith A McKean; John Van Arnam; Agda K Eterovic; Shiraj Sen; Charuta R Kale; Xiaoxing Yu; Cara L Haymaker; Mark Routbort; Lauren E Haydu; Chantale Bernatchez; Alexander J Lazar; Elizabeth A Grimm; David S Hong; Scott E Woodman
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2018-06-05

3.  Mutational Characteristics of Primary Mucosal Melanoma: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Olivia Beaudoux; Jean-Baptiste Oudart; Laurence Riffaud; Laetitia Visseaux; Aude Marchal; Anne-Sophie Lebre; Florent Grange
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 4.  The pharmacogenomics of drug resistance to protein kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Nancy K Gillis; Howard L McLeod
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 18.500

Review 5.  The mutational landscape of mucosal melanoma.

Authors:  Kelsey W Nassar; Aik Choon Tan
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 15.707

6.  Efficacy and safety of nilotinib in patients with KIT-mutated metastatic or inoperable melanoma: final results from the global, single-arm, phase II TEAM trial.

Authors:  J Guo; R D Carvajal; R Dummer; A Hauschild; A Daud; B C Bastian; S N Markovic; P Queirolo; A Arance; C Berking; V Camargo; D Herchenhorn; T M Petrella; D Schadendorf; W Sharfman; A Testori; S Novick; S Hertle; C Nourry; Q Chen; F S Hodi
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Copy number variations in atypical fibroxanthomas and pleomorphic dermal sarcomas.

Authors:  Doris Helbig; Alexander Quaas; Cornelia Mauch; Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse; Reinhard Büttner; Michael Emberger; Marion Wobser; Vanessa Rüsseler; Katharina Pütz; Elke Binot; Jan Rehker; Jan Budczies; Michaela Angelika Ihle
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-25

8.  Analysis of KIT gene mutations in patients with melanoma of the head and neck mucosa: a retrospective clinical report.

Authors:  Ullyanov Bezerra Toscano de Mendonça; Claudio Roberto Cernea; Leandro Luongo Matos; Roberto Rego Monteiro de Araujo Lima
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-05-01

Review 9.  KIT and Melanoma: Biological Insights and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Duc Daniel M Pham; Samantha Guhan; Hensin Tsao
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 10.  Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma.

Authors:  Mayuka Anko; Yusuke Kobayashi; Kouji Banno; Daisuke Aoki
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.