Literature DB >> 26424347

Thirty-day readmission rates in spine surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

James T Bernatz1, Paul A Anderson1.   

Abstract

OBJECT The rate of 30-day readmissions is rapidly gaining significance as a quality metric and is increasingly used to evaluate performance. An analysis of the present 30-day readmission rate in the spine literature is needed to aid the development of policies to decrease the frequency of readmissions. The authors examine 2 questions: 1) What is the 30-day readmission rate as reported in the spine literature? 2) What study factors impact the rate of 30-day readmissions? METHODS This study was registered with Prospera (CRD42014015319), and 4 electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) were searched for articles. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the current 30-day readmission rate in spine surgery. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria. The readmission rate as well as data source, time from enrollment, sample size, demographics, procedure type and spine level, risk factors for readmission, and causes of readmission were extrapolated from each study. RESULTS The pooled 30-day readmission rate was 5.5% (95% CI 4.2%-7.4%). Studies from single institutions reported the highest 30-day readmission rate at 6.6% (95% CI 3.8%-11.1%), while multicenter studies reported the lowest at 4.7% (95% CI 2.3%-9.7%). Time from enrollment had no statistically significant effect on the 30-day readmission rate. Studies including all spinal levels had a higher 30-day readmission rate (6.1%, 95% CI 4.1%-8.9%) than exclusively lumbar studies (4.6%, 95% CI 2.5%-8.2%); however, the difference between the 2 rates was not statistically significant (p = 0.43). The most frequently reported risk factors associated with an increased odds of 30-day readmission on multivariate analysis were an American Society of Anesthesiology score of 4+, operative duration, and Medicare/Medicaid insurance. The most common cause of readmission was wound complication (39.3%). CONCLUSIONS The 30-day readmission rate following spinal surgery is between 4.2% and 7.4%. The range, rather than the exact result, should be considered given the significant heterogeneity among studies, which indicates that there are factors such as demographics, procedure types, and individual institutional factors that are important and affect this outcome variable. The pooled analysis of risk factors and causes of readmission is limited by the lack of reporting in most of the spine literature.

Keywords:  ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; CMS = Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; HRRP = Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program; MeSH = Medical Subject Headings; NSQIP = National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; SSI = surgical site infection; neurosurgery; orthopedics; spine; thirty-day readmission

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26424347     DOI: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS1534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  20 in total

1.  Effects of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Wound Dehiscence and Surgical Site Infection Following Instrumented Spinal Fusion Surgery-A Single Surgeon's Experience.

Authors:  Ryan M Naylor; Hannah E Gilder; Nikita Gupta; Thomas C Hydrick; Joshua R Labott; David J Mauler; Taylor P Trentadue; Brandon Ghislain; Benjamin D Elder; Jeremy L Fogelson
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Factors associated with a 30-day unplanned readmission after elective spine surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tak Kyu Oh; Jung-Hee Ryu; Ji-W On Han; Chang-Hoon Koo; Young-Tae Jeon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Analysis of intra-operative variables as predictors of 30-day readmission in patients undergoing glioma surgery at a single center.

Authors:  Iahn Cajigas; Anil K Mahavadi; Ashish H Shah; Veronica Borowy; Nathalie Abitbol; Michael E Ivan; Ricardo J Komotar; Richard H Epstein
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  The association of discharge destination with 30-day rehospitalization rates among older adults receiving lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Authors:  Chad Cook; Rogelio A Coronado; Janet Prvu Bettger; James E Graham
Journal:  Musculoskelet Sci Pract       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 2.520

5.  The Impact of Isolated Baseline Cannabis Use on Outcomes Following Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusion: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Neil V Shah; Joshua D Lavian; Cameron R Moattari; Hassan Eldib; George A Beyer; David H Mai; Vincent Challier; Peter G Passias; Renaud Lafage; Virginie Lafage; Frank J Schwab; Carl B Paulino; Bassel G Diebo
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2022-06

6.  Interleukin-6 as inflammatory marker of surgical site infection following spinal surgery.

Authors:  Markus Lenski; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Sebastian Siller
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Thirty-day complication and readmission rates associated with resection of metastatic spinal tumors: a single institutional experience.

Authors:  Aladine A Elsamadicy; Owoicho Adogwa; David T Lubkin; Amanda R Sergesketter; Sohrab Vatsia; Eric W Sankey; Joseph Cheng; Carlos A Bagley; Isaac O Karikari
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

8.  Do In-Hospital Rothman Index Scores Predict Postdischarge Adverse Events and Discharge Location After Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Andrew D Kleven; Austin H Middleton; Ziynet Nesibe Kesimoglu; Isaac C Slagel; Ashley E Creager; Ryan Hanson; Serdar Bozdag; Adam I Edelstein
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Incidence, reasons, and risk factors for 30-day readmission after lumbar spine surgery for degenerative spinal disease.

Authors:  Pyung Goo Cho; Tae Hyun Kim; Hana Lee; Gyu Yeul Ji; Sang Hyuk Park; Dong Ah Shin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Length of stay, costs, and complications in lumbar disc herniation surgery by standard PLIF versus a new dynamic interspinous stabilization technique.

Authors:  Manuel Segura-Trepichio; David Candela-Zaplana; José Manuel Montoza-Nuñez; Antonio Martin-Benlloch; Andreu Nolasco
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2017-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.