BACKGROUND: Cognitive and functional impairment increase risk for post-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery delirium (PCD), but how much impairment is necessary to increase PCD risk remains unclear. METHODS: The Neuropsychiatric Outcomes After Heart Surgery (NOAHS) study is a prospective, observational cohort study of participants undergoing elective CABG surgery. Pre-operative cognitive and functional status based on Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale and neuropsychological battery are assessed. We defined mild cognitive impairment (MCI) based on either (1) CDR global score 0.5 (CDR-MCI) or (2) performance 1.5 SD below population means on any cognitive domain on neurocognitive battery (MCI-NC). Delirium was assessed daily post-operative day 2 through discharge using the confusion assessment method (CAM) and delirium index (DI). We investigate whether MCI - either definition - predicts delirium or delirium severity. RESULTS: So far we have assessed 102 participants (mean age 65.1 ± 9; male: 75%) for PCD. Twenty six participants (25%) have MCI-CDR; 38 (62% of those completing neurocognitive testing) met MCI-NC criteria. Fourteen participants (14%) developed PCD. After adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, and education, MCI-CDR, MMSE, and Lawton IADL score predicted PCD on logistic regression (OR: 5.6, 0.6, and 1.5, respectively); MCI-NC did not (OR [95% CI]: 11.8 [0.9, 151.4]). Using similarly adjusted linear regression, MCI-CDR, MCI-NC, CDR sum of boxes, MMSE, and Lawton IADL score predicted delirium severity (adjusted R(2): 0.26, 0.13, 0.21, 0.18, and 0.32, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: MCI predicts post-operative delirium and delirium severity, but MCI definition alters these relationships. Cognitive and functional impairment independently predict post-operative delirium and delirium severity.
BACKGROUND: Cognitive and functional impairment increase risk for post-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery delirium (PCD), but how much impairment is necessary to increase PCD risk remains unclear. METHODS: The Neuropsychiatric Outcomes After Heart Surgery (NOAHS) study is a prospective, observational cohort study of participants undergoing elective CABG surgery. Pre-operative cognitive and functional status based on Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale and neuropsychological battery are assessed. We defined mild cognitive impairment (MCI) based on either (1) CDR global score 0.5 (CDR-MCI) or (2) performance 1.5 SD below population means on any cognitive domain on neurocognitive battery (MCI-NC). Delirium was assessed daily post-operative day 2 through discharge using the confusion assessment method (CAM) and delirium index (DI). We investigate whether MCI - either definition - predicts delirium or delirium severity. RESULTS: So far we have assessed 102 participants (mean age 65.1 ± 9; male: 75%) for PCD. Twenty six participants (25%) have MCI-CDR; 38 (62% of those completing neurocognitive testing) met MCI-NC criteria. Fourteen participants (14%) developed PCD. After adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, and education, MCI-CDR, MMSE, and Lawton IADL score predicted PCD on logistic regression (OR: 5.6, 0.6, and 1.5, respectively); MCI-NC did not (OR [95% CI]: 11.8 [0.9, 151.4]). Using similarly adjusted linear regression, MCI-CDR, MCI-NC, CDR sum of boxes, MMSE, and Lawton IADL score predicted delirium severity (adjusted R(2): 0.26, 0.13, 0.21, 0.18, and 0.32, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: MCI predicts post-operative delirium and delirium severity, but MCI definition alters these relationships. Cognitive and functional impairment independently predict post-operative delirium and delirium severity.
Authors: Jakub Kazmierski; Maciej Kowman; Maciej Banach; Tomasz Pawelczyk; Piotr Okonski; Alicja Iwaszkiewicz; Janusz Zaslonka; Tomasz Sobow; Iwona Kloszewska Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Jakub Kazmierski; Andrzej Banys; Joanna Latek; Julius Bourke; Ryszard Jaszewski; Tomasz Sobow; Iwona Kloszewska Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Maciej Banach; Jakub Kazmierski; Maciej Kowman; Piotr K Okonski; Tomasz Sobow; Iwona Kloszewska; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Aleksander Goch; Andrzej Banys; Jacek Rysz; Jan Henryk Goch; Ryszard Jaszewski Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2008-05
Authors: Annie M Racine; Tamara G Fong; Thomas G Travison; Richard N Jones; Yun Gou; Sarinnapha M Vasunilashorn; Edward R Marcantonio; David C Alsop; Sharon K Inouye; Bradford C Dickerson Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Alvin Thomas; Christine E Haugen; Alexandra Mountford; Fatima Warsame; Rachel Berkowitz; Sunjae Bae; Charles H Brown; Daniel C Brennan; Karin J Neufeld; Michelle C Carlson; Dorry L Segev; Mara McAdams-DeMarco Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Mark A Oldham; Keith A Hawkins; I-Hsin Lin; Yanhong Deng; Qing Hao; Leslie M Scoutt; David D Yuh; Hochang B Lee Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2018-12-25 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Annie M Racine; Tamara G Fong; Yun Gou; Thomas G Travison; Douglas Tommet; Kristen Erickson; Richard N Jones; Bradford C Dickerson; Eran Metzger; Edward R Marcantonio; Eva M Schmitt; Sharon K Inouye Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Juraj Sprung; Rosebud O Roberts; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Toby N Weingarten; Darrell R Schroeder; David O Warner Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Mark A Oldham; I-Hsin Lin; Keith A Hawkins; Fang-Yong Li; David D Yuh; Hochang B Lee Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Danielle Greaves; Peter J Psaltis; Daniel H J Davis; Tyler J Ross; Erica S Ghezzi; Amit Lampit; Ashleigh E Smith; Hannah A D Keage Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-11-07 Impact factor: 6.106