Literature DB >> 26423687

Appropriateness of Prostate Cancer Imaging among Veterans in a Delivery System without Incentives for Overutilization.

Danil V Makarov1,2,3,4,5, Elaine Y C Hu6, Dawn Walter1,2,3,4, R Scott Braithwaite3,4, Scott Sherman1,3,4, Heather T Gold3,4, Xiao-Hua Andrew Zhou6, Cary P Gross7, Steven B Zeliadt6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of appropriate and inappropriate prostate cancer imaging in an integrated health care system. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Veterans Health Administration Central Cancer Registry linked to VA electronic medical records and Medicare claims (2004-2008). STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of VA patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (N = 45,084). Imaging (CT, MRI, bone scan, PET) use was assessed among patients with low-risk disease, for whom guidelines recommend against advanced imaging, and among high-risk patients for whom guidelines recommend it. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: We found high rates of inappropriate imaging among men with low-risk prostate cancer (41 percent) and suboptimal rates of appropriate imaging among men with high-risk disease (70 percent). Veterans utilizing Medicare-reimbursed care had higher rates of inappropriate imaging [OR: 1.09 (1.03-1.16)] but not higher rates of appropriate imaging. Veterans treated in middle [OR: 0.51 (0.47-0.56)] and higher [OR: 0.50 (0.46-0.55)] volume medical centers were less likely to undergo inappropriate imaging without compromising appropriate imaging.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the overutilization of imaging, even in an integrated health care system without financial incentives encouraging provision of health care services. Paradoxically, imaging remains underutilized among high-risk patients who could potentially benefit from it most. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health care organizations and systems; VA health care system; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26423687      PMCID: PMC4874832          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  46 in total

Review 1.  From understanding health care provider behavior to improving health care: the QUERI framework for quality improvement. Quality Enhancement Research Initiative.

Authors:  L V Rubenstein; B S Mittman; E M Yano; C D Mulrow
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Estimating private sector professional fees for VA providers.

Authors:  Gary Roselle; Marta L Render; Linda B Nugent; Gary N Nugent
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Variations in use of imaging in a national sample of men with early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Chris L Pashos; James M Henning; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Overuse of imaging for staging low risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wesley W Choi; Stephen B Williams; Xiangmei Gu; Stuart R Lipsitz; Paul L Nguyen; Jim C Hu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  The population level prevalence and correlates of appropriate and inappropriate imaging to stage incident prostate cancer in the medicare population.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Rani A Desai; James B Yu; Richa Sharma; Nitya Abraham; Peter C Albertsen; David F Penson; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Establishment of a urological surgery quality collaborative.

Authors:  David C Miller; Daniel S Murtagh; Ronald S Suh; Peter M Knapp; Rodney L Dunn; James E Montie
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Outcomes in lung transplantation after previous lung volume reduction surgery in a contemporary cohort.

Authors:  Leah Backhus; Jonathon Sargent; Aaron Cheng; Steven Zeliadt; Douglas Wood; Michael Mulligan
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Prevalence and costs of chronic conditions in the VA health care system.

Authors:  Wei Yu; Arliene Ravelo; Todd H Wagner; Ciaran S Phibbs; Aman Bhandari; Shuo Chen; Paul G Barnett
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.929

10.  Prostate cancer. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 11.908

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Overuse of Health Care Services in the Management of Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shrujal S Baxi; Minal Kale; Salomeh Keyhani; Benjamin R Roman; Annie Yang; Antonio P Derosa; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Determinants of the overuse of imaging in low-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Allison H Oakes; Ritu Sharma; Madeline Jackson; Jodi B Segal
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 3.  The State of Men's Health Services in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Michael Fenstermaker; Sujay Paknikar; Amarnath Rambhatla; Dana A Ohl; Ted A Skolarus; James M Dupree
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Use of Evidence-Based Prostate Cancer Imaging in a Nongovernmental Integrated Health Care System.

Authors:  Ramzi G Salloum; Maureen O'Keeffe-Rosetti; Debra P Ritzwoller; Mark C Hornbrook; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Matthew E Nielsen
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 5.  Systematic review of interventions that improve provider compliance to imaging guidelines for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samuel M Pettit; David Mikhail; Michael Feuerstein
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.052

6.  Characterising potential bone scan overuse amongst men treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Peter S Kirk; Tudor Borza; Megan E V Caram; Dean A Shumway; Danil V Makarov; Jennifer A Burns; Jeremy B Shelton; John T Leppert; Christina Chapman; Michael Chang; Brent K Hollenbeck; Ted A Skolarus
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  A qualitative study to understand guideline-discordant use of imaging to stage incident prostate cancer.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Erica Sedlander; R Scott Braithwaite; Scott E Sherman; Steven Zeliadt; Cary P Gross; Caitlin Curnyn; Michele Shedlin
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 8.  Evidence-Based Cancer Imaging.

Authors:  Atul B Shinagare; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Disparities in staging prostate magnetic resonance imaging utilization for nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients undergoing definitive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Ayobami Ajayi; Wei-Ting Hwang; Neha Vapiwala; Mark Rosen; Christina H Chapman; Stefan Both; Meera Shah; Xingmei Wang; Atu Agawu; Peter Gabriel; John Christodouleas; Zelig Tochner; Curtiland Deville
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-07-25

10.  Initiative to reduce bone scans for low-risk prostate cancer patients: A quasi-experimental before-and-after study in a Veterans Affairs hospital.

Authors:  Eric Ojerholm; Keith N Van Arsdalen; Robert E Roses; Patrick Tripp
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.