Rachel Tillery1, Katianne M Howard Sharp1, Yuko Okado2, Alanna Long2, Sean Phipps3. 1. Department of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital and Department of Psychology, The University of Memphis. 2. Department of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital and. 3. Department of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital and sean.phipps@stjude.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Inconsistent links between posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTS) and posttraumatic growth (PTG) in youth following a stressful life event have been observed in previous literature. Latent profile analysis (LPA) provides a novel approach to examine the heterogeneity of relations between these constructs. METHOD: Participants were 435 youth (cancer group=253; healthy comparisons = 182) and one parent. Children completed measures of PTS, PTG, and a life-events checklist. Parents reported on their own PTS and PTG. LPA was conducted to identify distinct adjustment classes. RESULTS: LPA revealed three profiles. The majority of youth (83%) fell into two resilient groups differing by levels of PTG. Several factors predicted youth's profile membership. CONCLUSIONS: PTS and PTG appear to be relatively independent constructs, and their relation is dependent on contextual factors. The majority of youth appear to be resilient, and even those who experience significant distress were able to find benefit.
OBJECTIVE: Inconsistent links between posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTS) and posttraumatic growth (PTG) in youth following a stressful life event have been observed in previous literature. Latent profile analysis (LPA) provides a novel approach to examine the heterogeneity of relations between these constructs. METHOD:Participants were 435 youth (cancer group=253; healthy comparisons = 182) and one parent. Children completed measures of PTS, PTG, and a life-events checklist. Parents reported on their own PTS and PTG. LPA was conducted to identify distinct adjustment classes. RESULTS:LPA revealed three profiles. The majority of youth (83%) fell into two resilient groups differing by levels of PTG. Several factors predicted youth's profile membership. CONCLUSIONS: PTS and PTG appear to be relatively independent constructs, and their relation is dependent on contextual factors. The majority of youth appear to be resilient, and even those who experience significant distress were able to find benefit.
Authors: Sean Phipps; James L Klosky; Alanna Long; Melissa M Hudson; Qinlei Huang; Hui Zhang; Robert B Noll Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M H Antoni; J M Lehman; K M Kilbourn; A E Boyers; J L Culver; S M Alferi; S E Yount; B A McGregor; P L Arena; S D Harris; A A Price; C S Carver Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: James L Klosky; Kevin R Krull; Toana Kawashima; Wendy Leisenring; Mary E Randolph; Brad Zebrack; Margaret L Stuber; Leslie L Robison; Sean Phipps Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2014-05-05 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Tara M Brinkman; Christopher J Recklitis; Gisela Michel; Martha A Grootenhuis; James L Klosky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Katianne M Howard Sharp; Victoria W Willard; Sarah Barnes; Rachel Tillery; Alanna Long; Sean Phipps Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2017-01-01
Authors: Deborah B Crom; Kirsten K Ness; Larry R Martinez; Michelle R Hebl; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Tara M Brinkman Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2018-03-17 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: I-Chan Huang; Tara M Brinkman; Larry Mullins; Ching-Hon Pui; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Kevin R Krull Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Jennifer Allen; Victoria W Willard; James L Klosky; Chenghong Li; D Kumar Srivastava; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Sean Phipps Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2017-11-03 Impact factor: 4.442