Paul Y Kim1, Robin L Toblin1, Lyndon A Riviere1, Brian C Kok1, Sasha H Grossman1, Joshua E Wilk1. 1. Except for Dr. Toblin, the authors are with the Military Psychiatry Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland (e-mail: paul.y.kim12.ctr@mail.mil ). Dr. Toblin is with the Research Transition Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study examined sources of help (providers or nonproviders) used by soldiers for mental health problems. Differences in perceived barriers to care by type of help used were also assessed. METHODS: Active-duty soldiers from four brigade combat teams (N=3,380) were surveyed in 2008-2009. Items assessed posttraumatic stress disorder; depression; anxiety; help needed because of a stress, emotional, alcohol, or family problem; stigma; negative attitudes toward care; and organizational barriers. Participants reported receipt of help in the past three months from providers (mental health or medical professionals or an Army resource hotline) or nonproviders (fellow soldier, medic, chaplain, or chain of command). RESULTS: Nearly a third (31%) were identified as being in need of mental health care. Of those, 5% reported using nonprovider help exclusively, 14% used provider help exclusively, and 7% used both types. Stigma was rated significantly lower as a barrier among those who used help exclusively from providers than among those who did not use help from any source; however, no significant differences in stigma scores were found between those who used help from nonproviders and those who did not use help from any source. Soldiers who used help from nonproviders were more likely than those who used help from providers to perceive organizational barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that soldiers may view nonproviders as alternative sources of mental health help, suggesting that the Army should ensure that such resources are adequately trained and integrated into the mental health community so that soldiers can receive the help they need.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined sources of help (providers or nonproviders) used by soldiers for mental health problems. Differences in perceived barriers to care by type of help used were also assessed. METHODS: Active-duty soldiers from four brigade combat teams (N=3,380) were surveyed in 2008-2009. Items assessed posttraumatic stress disorder; depression; anxiety; help needed because of a stress, emotional, alcohol, or family problem; stigma; negative attitudes toward care; and organizational barriers. Participants reported receipt of help in the past three months from providers (mental health or medical professionals or an Army resource hotline) or nonproviders (fellow soldier, medic, chaplain, or chain of command). RESULTS: Nearly a third (31%) were identified as being in need of mental health care. Of those, 5% reported using nonprovider help exclusively, 14% used provider help exclusively, and 7% used both types. Stigma was rated significantly lower as a barrier among those who used help exclusively from providers than among those who did not use help from any source; however, no significant differences in stigma scores were found between those who used help from nonproviders and those who did not use help from any source. Soldiers who used help from nonproviders were more likely than those who used help from providers to perceive organizational barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that soldiers may view nonproviders as alternative sources of mental health help, suggesting that the Army should ensure that such resources are adequately trained and integrated into the mental health community so that soldiers can receive the help they need.
Authors: Jennifer L Crockett; Helen F Yu-Lefler; Emily D Shumate; Jamie L Benson; Neha Karray; Susan Perkins-Parks; Anne W Riley Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Isabel G Jacobson; Emily C Williams; Amber D Seelig; Alyson J Littman; Charles C Maynard; Jonathan B Bricker; Rudolph P Rull; Edward J Boyko Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2020 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 3.702