Is there still a place for "old therapies" in the management of immune thrombocytopenia?

New molecules such as rituximab or thrombopoietin receptor agonists (romiplostim and eltrombopag) have changed the management of immune thrombocytopenia. Therefore, old drugs which are less expensive and with a well-known benefit/risk ratio are being underused. We aim to define the place of dapsone, danazol, hydroxychloroquine and vinca-alkaloids at the era of targeted therapy in immune thrombocytopenia. With a response rate around 30% to 50%, dapsone is an interesting second-line therapy to be used just after corticosteroids. Patients with positive antinuclear antibodies can benefit from hydroxychloroquine with a 50% response rate. Because of its side effects, mostly virilization, danazol will be preferentially used in the elderly. Vinca-alkaloids could be temporarily used in patients that do not respond to intravenous immunoglobulins or to limit their use to avoid shortage periods.