Helios A Zeno1, Renan L Buitrago1, Sidney S Sternberger1, Marisa E Patt1, Nick Tovar2, Paulo Coelho2, Kenneth S Kurtz1,3, Frank J Tuminelli4. 1. Department of Graduate Prosthodontics, New York Presbyterian, Queens, NY. 2. Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY. 3. Department of Graduate Prosthodontics, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY. 4. Director of Graduate Prosthodontics, New York Presbyterian, Queens, NY.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the removal of torque values of machined implant abutment connections (internal and external) with and without soft tissue entrapment using an in vitro model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty external- and 30 internal-connection implants were embedded in urethane dimethacrylate. Porcine tissue was prepared and measured to thicknesses of 0.5 and 1.0 mm. Six groups (n = 10) were studied: External- and internal-connection implants with no tissue (control), 0.5, and 1.0 mm of tissue were entrapped at the implant/abutment interface. Abutments were inserted to 20 Ncm for all six groups. Insertion torque values were recorded using a digital torque gauge. All groups were then immersed in 1 M NaOH for 48 hours to dissolve tissue. Subsequent reverse torque measurements were recorded. Mean and standard deviation were determined for each group, and one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: All 60 specimens achieved a 20-Ncm insertion torque, despite tissue entrapment. Reverse torque measurements for external connection displayed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between all groups with mean reverse torque values for the control (13.71 ± 1.4 Ncm), 0.5 mm (7.83 ± 2.4 Ncm), and 1.0 mm tissue entrapment (2.29 ± 1.4 Ncm) groups. Some statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were found between internal-connection groups. In all specimens, tissue did not completely dissolve after 48 hours. CONCLUSIONS: External-connection implants were significantly affected by tissue entrapment; the thicker the tissue, the lower the reverse torque values noted. Internal-connection implants were less affected by tissue entrapment.
PURPOSE: To compare the removal of torque values of machined implant abutment connections (internal and external) with and without soft tissue entrapment using an in vitro model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty external- and 30 internal-connection implants were embedded in urethane dimethacrylate. Porcine tissue was prepared and measured to thicknesses of 0.5 and 1.0 mm. Six groups (n = 10) were studied: External- and internal-connection implants with no tissue (control), 0.5, and 1.0 mm of tissue were entrapped at the implant/abutment interface. Abutments were inserted to 20 Ncm for all six groups. Insertion torque values were recorded using a digital torque gauge. All groups were then immersed in 1 M NaOH for 48 hours to dissolve tissue. Subsequent reverse torque measurements were recorded. Mean and standard deviation were determined for each group, and one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: All 60 specimens achieved a 20-Ncm insertion torque, despite tissue entrapment. Reverse torque measurements for external connection displayed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between all groups with mean reverse torque values for the control (13.71 ± 1.4 Ncm), 0.5 mm (7.83 ± 2.4 Ncm), and 1.0 mm tissue entrapment (2.29 ± 1.4 Ncm) groups. Some statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were found between internal-connection groups. In all specimens, tissue did not completely dissolve after 48 hours. CONCLUSIONS: External-connection implants were significantly affected by tissue entrapment; the thicker the tissue, the lower the reverse torque values noted. Internal-connection implants were less affected by tissue entrapment.