Joo-Yup Lee1, Guilherme Giusti2, Patricia F Friedrich2, Allen T Bishop3, Alexander Y Shin3. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. 2. Microvascular Research Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) administration around the autologous nerve graft on nerve recovery in a rat model. METHODS: A total of 69 rats were randomly divided into three experimental groups. A 10-mm sciatic nerve defect was made and reconstructed with the reversed nerve segment. Group I received an osmotic pump with saline, group II received an osmotic pump with VEGF, and group III added a silicone tube around the nerve graft to decrease the surrounding blood supply. Nine animals in each group were sacrificed on day 3 to evaluate improvement in new vessel formation. In each group 14 animals were sacrificed at 16 weeks after the initial procedure to evaluate the functional motor nerve regeneration using compound muscle action potential, isometric tetanic force, wet muscle weight, and nerve histomorphometry. RESULTS: The average vascular density on day 3 was 10.7% in group I, 21.4% in group II, and 0.9% in group III. These differences were significant. However, the average maximum isometric tetanic force at 16 weeks was 54.4% in group I, 57.5% in group II, and 47.6% in group III. No difference was found with or without VEGF administration. Histomorphometric analysis was also not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: New vessel formation on autologous nerve graft was enhanced by VEGF administration. However, the neovascularization effect of VEGF administration did not translate into better motor nerve recovery. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) administration around the autologous nerve graft on nerve recovery in a rat model. METHODS: A total of 69 rats were randomly divided into three experimental groups. A 10-mm sciatic nerve defect was made and reconstructed with the reversed nerve segment. Group I received an osmotic pump with saline, group II received an osmotic pump with VEGF, and group III added a silicone tube around the nerve graft to decrease the surrounding blood supply. Nine animals in each group were sacrificed on day 3 to evaluate improvement in new vessel formation. In each group 14 animals were sacrificed at 16 weeks after the initial procedure to evaluate the functional motor nerve regeneration using compound muscle action potential, isometric tetanic force, wet muscle weight, and nerve histomorphometry. RESULTS: The average vascular density on day 3 was 10.7% in group I, 21.4% in group II, and 0.9% in group III. These differences were significant. However, the average maximum isometric tetanic force at 16 weeks was 54.4% in group I, 57.5% in group II, and 47.6% in group III. No difference was found with or without VEGF administration. Histomorphometric analysis was also not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: New vessel formation on autologous nerve graft was enhanced by VEGF administration. However, the neovascularization effect of VEGF administration did not translate into better motor nerve recovery. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
Authors: Tiam M Saffari; Amr Badreldin; Femke Mathot; Leila Bagheri; Allen T Bishop; Andre J van Wijnen; Alexander Y Shin Journal: Gene Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 3.688
Authors: Jung Il Lee; Ji Hun Park; Yeong-Rim Kim; Kihak Gwon; Hae Won Hwang; Gayoung Jung; Joo-Yup Lee; Jeong-Yun Sun; Jong Woong Park; Jae Ho Shin; Myoung-Ryul Ok Journal: Neural Regen Res Date: 2022-09 Impact factor: 5.135
Authors: Tiam M Saffari; Femke Mathot; Patricia F Friedrich; Allen T Bishop; Alexander Y Shin Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 4.730