| Literature DB >> 26422162 |
Rafael Felipe da Costa Vieira1, Odilon Vidotto2, Thállitha Samih Wischral Jayme Vieira2, Ana Márcia Sá Guimaraes3, Andrea Pires dos Santos3, Naíla Cannes Nascimento3, Nelson Jesse Rodrigues dos Santos2, Thiago Fernandes Martins4, Marcelo Bahia Labruna4, Mary Marcondes5, Alexander Welker Biondo1, Joanne Belle Messick3.
Abstract
The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of hemoplasmas in a rural Brazilian settlement's population of human beings, their dogs and horses, highly exposed to tick bites; to identify the tick species parasitizing dogs and horses, and analyze factors associated with their infection. Blood samples from 132 dogs, 16 horses and 100 humans were screened using a pan-hemoplasma SYBR green real-time PCR assay followed by a species-specific TaqMan real-time PCR. A total of 59/132 (44.7%) dog samples were positive for hemoplasmas (21 Mycoplasma haemocanis alone, 12 ' Candidatus Mycoplasma haematoparvum' alone and 21 both). Only 1/100 (1.0%) human sample was positive by qPCR SYBR green, with no successful amplification of 16S rRNA or 23 rRNA genes despite multiple attempts. All horse samples were negative. Dogs >1 year of age were more likely to be positive for hemoplasmas ( p= 0.0014). In conclusion, although canine hemoplasma infection was highly prevalent, cross-species hemoplasma transmission was not observed, and therefore may not frequently occur despite overexposure of agents and vectors.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26422162 PMCID: PMC4616923 DOI: 10.1590/S0036-46652015000400014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo ISSN: 0036-4665 Impact factor: 1.846
Prevalence of hemoplasma in dogs from a rural settlement, Paraná State, Southern Brazil according to each variable studied
| Variable | +/N (%) | OR | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presence of ticks | ||||
| Yes | 29/73 (39.7%) | 0.63 | 0.31-1.27 | 0.2013 |
| No | 30/59 (50.8%) | |||
| Age (years) | ||||
| >1 | 46/82 (56.1%) | 3.63 | 1.68-7.83 | 0.0014 |
| ≤1 | 13/50 (26%) | |||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 37/83 (44.6%) | 0.98 | 0.48-2.0 | 0.9715 |
| Female | 22/49 (44.9%) |
+, Number of positive animals; N, number of samples per variable; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.