Literature DB >> 26422159

EFFICACY OF NITAZOXANIDE AGAINST Toxocara canis: LARVAL RECOVERY AND HUMORAL IMMUNE RESPONSE IN EXPERIMENTALLY INFECTED MICE.

Susana A Zevallos Lescano1, Sergio Vieira dos Santos1, Jesiel Maurício Lemos Assis1, Pedro Paulo Chieffi1.   

Abstract

The efficacy of nitazoxanide (NTZ) against toxocariasis was investigated in an experimental murine model and results were compared to those obtained using mebendazole. Sixty male BALB/c mice, aged six to eight weeks-old, were divided into groups of 10 each; fifty were orally infected with 300 larvaed eggs of T. canis and grouped as follows, G I: infected untreated mice; G II: infected mice treated with MBZ (15 mg/kg/day) 10 days postinfection (dpi); G III: infected mice treated with NTZ (20 mg/kg/day) 10 dpi; G IV: infected mice treated with MBZ 60 dpi; G V: infected mice treated with NTZ 60 dpi; GVI: control group comprising uninfected mice. Mice were bled via retro-orbital plexus on four occasions between 30 and 120 dpi. Sera were processed using the ELISA technique to detect IgG anti- Toxocara antibodies. At 120 dpi, mice were sacrificed for larval recovery in the CNS, liver, lungs, kidneys, eyes and carcass. Results showed similar levels of anti- Toxocara IgG antibodies among mice infected but not submitted to treatment and groups treated with MBZ or NTZ, 10 and 60 dpi. Larval recovery showed similar values in groups treated with NTZ and MBZ 10 dpi. MBZ showed better efficacy 60 dpi, with a 72.6% reduction in the parasite load compared with NTZ, which showed only 46.5% reduction. We conclude that administration of these anthelmintics did not modify the humoral response in experimental infection by T. canis. No parasitological cure was observed with either drug; however, a greater reduction in parasite load was achieved following treatment with MBZ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26422159      PMCID: PMC4616920          DOI: 10.1590/S0036-46652015000400011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo        ISSN: 0036-4665            Impact factor:   1.846


INTRODUCTION

Human infection by Toxocara larvae is considered an important and frequent zoonosis worldwide, and the main cause of visceral larva migrans (VLM) and other related syndromes. In humans, the main etiological agents for these syndromes are Toxocara canis and T. cati, respectively, ascarids of dogs and cats5 , 11 , 16 . Several drugs are currently used to treat VLM in humans, and benzimidazole anthelmintics have shown moderate or good efficacy in the resolution of clinical signs or symptoms16 , 28. Experimentally, however, the various drugs tested in a murine model, which, as occurs in humans, are paratenic hosts species for Toxocara spp. larvae, showed a reduction of the parasite load that did not result in complete parasitological cure1 , 6 , 22. The same situation probably occurs in the treatment of infected humans. In recent years, studies have demonstrated the efficacy of nitazoxanide in the treatment of infections caused by certain protozoa, helminths, anaerobic bacteria and hepatitis C virus19, but few reports exist concerning its use in the treatment of infections caused by helminth larvae, particularly, roundworm larvae15. More recently, DELGADO et al. 9 reported an efficacy of 61.2% in the treatment of mice experimentally infected by T. canis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response of mice experimentally infected by T. canis following treatment with nitazoxanide on the tenth and sixtieth days after infection (dpi), regarding the reduction in parasitic load and the humoral response represented by anti-Toxocara IgG antibodies, compared to the response obtained in mice treated with mebendazole, previously considered a good schedule in the reduction of T. canis load in mice21.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eggs: T. canis eggs used in this experiment were obtained from adult female worms, eliminated by naturally infected dogs following treatment with piperazine. After dissecting the worms, eggs were incubated in 2% formalin at 26 oC for four to six weeks, and washed in filtered water to remove formalin before use. Mice infection and treatment: Sixty male BALB/c mice, aged six to eight weeks-old, provided by the Faculty of Medicine of São University, were divided into groups of 10 mice each. Fifty mice were infected by stomach tube with 300 T. canis embryonated eggs in 200 μL of filtered water suspension, and ten mice were maintained as an uninfected control group, receiving filtered water alone, as indicated in Table 1. All the animals used in this study received water and a commercial diet ad lib and were treated in accordance to the ethical guidelines of the Institutional Experimental Guidelines for animal studies (CEUA) of the Institute of Tropical Medicine of São Paulo University (IMT/USP).
Table 1

Experimental infection and treatment of BALB/c mice with different doses of mebendazole and nitazoxanide

Group Infection phase Drug/ dose
I Infected No treatment
II Acute phase mebendazole (15 mg/kg/day)
III Acute phase nitazoxanide (20 mg/kg/day)
IV Chronic phase mebendazole (15 mg/kg/day)
V Chronic phase nitazoxanide (20 mg/kg/day)
Control Noninfected No treatment
At the acute phase of infection, 10 days postinfection (dpi), mice from group II were treated per os with mebendazole (15 mg/kg/day), and those from group III with nitazoxanide (20 mg/kg/day), for five consecutive days. Groups IV and V were treated with mebendazole and nitazoxanide respectively, using the same doses at 60 dpi (chronic phase of the infection) for the same period. Group I remained untreated throughout the experiment. Sera collection: All groups were anesthetized with 100 mg/kg of xylazine and 10 mg/kg of ketamine, and bled by orbital plexus puncture at 30, 60, 90 and 120 dpi. The sera obtained were frozen and stored in aliquots in plastic micro tubes at -20 °C, for subsequent processing by ELISA. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Ig ELISA): Serum samples collected from mice with different treatment schedules were examined by ELISA to detect IgG class anti-Toxocara antibodies; using excretionsecretion T. canis antigen (TES) prepared from the culture of infective larvae of this parasite in Eagle medium, according to a standardized technique described by DE SAVIGNY et al.10 and modified in our laboratory. Different concentrations of ES antigen of T. canis were tested using positive and negative control sera and a protein concentration of 20 μg/mL (100 mL per well in plate) was determined to performe the tests. Mouse sera were diluted in PBS-T-Gelatin at 1:800. The enzyme conjugate anti-mouse IgG labeled with horseradish peroxidase (g-chain specific, Sigma Immunochemicals) was used at 1:4,000 dilution. A mixture of H2O2 and O-phenylenediamine (1.2-Benzenediamine) (Sigma Chemical Co.) [C6H8N2. 2HCl], diluted in citrate-phosphate buffer, was used as substrate. The results were evaluated by spectrophotometric reading at a wavelength of 492 nm in Titertek Multiskan apparatus MCC/340 P version 2.20 (Lab-Systems, Finland). To calculate the threshold of reactivity ("cut-off") the mean optical density (OD) of readings of sera from control group mice was considered, plus two standard deviations. As a positive control, serum samples from three mice infected for 90 days were used18 and, as a negative control, serum samples from mice bled before infection were used. T. canis larval recovery in tissues: At the end of the experiment (120 dpi), mice from all the infected groups were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and larvae were recovered from their brains and carcasses, following digestion with 0.5% HCl for 24 h at 37 ºC. Sedimental liquid was centrifuged for two min at 1500 rpm, 2 mL of the sediment were collected, thoroughly mixed, and 0.1 mL samples were viewed under a light microscope to determine larval counts33. Statistics: Arithmetic mean and standard deviation were used to present data. One-way ANOVA and Tukey test for multiple comparisons were conducted with Optical Density (OD) readings of sera from infected and treated mice from different groups, and two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post test were used to compare larval recovery in tissues using the Prisma program, version 5.0. Differences were considered to be significant when p < 0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

An issue that has not been fully resolved is the way of assessing drugs used in the treatment of experimental toxocariasis, in which the murine model is the most frequently used. Numerous authors have used the recovery of T. canis larvae, following digestion of the carcass and some organs of experimentally infected mice14 , 23 , 24 , 28 , 31. Others, however, have employed immunological techniques3 , 7. In this study, we sought to determine the kinetics of IgG anti-Toxocara antibodies in mice, experimentally infected with larvae of this nematode and subsequently treated with mebendazole (MBZ) or nitazoxanide (NTZ), as well as observing larval recovery after acid digestion of different mouse organs and tissues. The humoral antibody response of the IgG class anti-Toxocara(Fig. 1 and 2) was detected within the first 30 dpi, which remained positive up to 120 dpi in both groups treated with both anthelmintic drugs. Moreover, a marked increase in antibodies was observed between 90 and 120 dpi. This reactivity is probably due to the continuous release of Toxocara antigens even by dead larvae, from antigens stored in their cuticles. On the other hand, it is known that most anthelmintics do not reach all larvae present in the host8 , 21. No other significant differences were observed in the levels of anti-Toxocara antibodies among mice treated with nitazoxanide or mebendazole compared with the group infected, but not submitted to treatment.
Fig. 1

Dynamics of ELISA circulating anti-T. canis Ig G antibodies in BALB/c mice infected with Toxocara canis eggs and treated in the acute phase of infection (10dpi) with G II- mebendazole (■) or G III- nitazoxanide (▲), comparing with the G I (◌) infected non-treated group.

Fig. 2

Dynamics of ELISA circulating anti-T. canis Ig G antibodies in BALB/c mice infected with Toxocara canis eggs and treated in the chronic phase of infection (60 dpi) with G IV-mebendazole (■) or G V-nitazoxanide (▲), comparing with the G I (◌) infected non-treated group.

Comparing the amount of T. canis larvae recovered in various organs of mice treated with mebendazole or nitazoxanide with the result in the group not submitted to treatment, differences were only observed when the treatment occurred after 60 days of infection (Table 2). Moreover, the difference was significantly more evident in the group treated with mebendazole.
Table 2

Toxocara canis larval recovery in BALB/c mice treated with MBZ or NTZ in the acute and chronic phases of experimental infection (mean and standard deviation).

Groups Acute phase Chronic phase
MBZ 84.4 ± 38.1 24.6 ± 23.9 *
NTZ 71.6 ± 24.3 48.3 ± 27.7
Infected untreated 89.9 ± 22.9

MBZ = mebendazole; NTZ = nitazoxanide; * p < 0.05

Posttreatment larval recovery, in all the organs analyzed, revealed a decrease in the amount of larvae recovered in the central nervous system of the mice (Table 3).
Table 3

Mean number and standard deviation of Toxocara canis larvae recovered in organs and tissues of BALB/c mice infected and treated with MBZ or NTZ in the acute and chronic phases of infection

GI (Non treated) Acute Chronic
GII-MBZ GIII-NTZ GIV-MBZ GV-NTZ
Carcass 59 ± 11.59 45.4 ± 10.21 42.6 ± 16.94 16 ±14.54 38.6 ± 22.52
Liver 2.8 ± 2.16 2.8 ± 2.38 1.6 ± 1.67 0.4 ± 0.89 1.2 ± 1.6
Lungs 0.4 ± 0.89 0 0.2 ± 0.44 0 0
Kidneys 0 0 0 0 0
Brain 26.8 ± 16.11 35.8 ± 31.52 27 ± 14.37 8.2 ± 8.64 7.4 ± 3.43
Eyes 0.8 ± 1.30 0.4 ± 0.54 0.2 ± 0.44 0 0.8 ± 1.30
Previous studies indicated that mice and other murine behave like paratenic hosts when infected by larvae of T. canis 30 and are therefore suitable models for studying host-parasite relationships in the case of human infection with this nematode4 , 11. In C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice infected with T. canis and untreated, the larvae can be found in the brain and carcass, even up to a year after inoculation, with a slight reduction in the total larval count17 , 20. Various anthelmintics have been used in the treatment of murine toxocariasis, in order to evaluate their efficacy: mebendazole, albendazole, fenbendazole and thiabendazole. The first three, and diethylcarbamazine, were recommended by the WHO in 1995 as effective drugs against toxocariasis20. According to SMITH et al. 29, mebendazole seems to be a good alternative for toxocariasis treatment in paratenic hosts. LESCANO et al.21 also reported a significant decrease in the parasite load of mice experimentally infected by T. canis and treated with mebendazole, thiabendazole or ivermectin. MBZ = mebendazole; NTZ = nitazoxanide; * p < 0.05 Nitazoxanide (NTZ) is a novel compound with broad-spectrum activity against several genera of parasites, including intestinal protozoa, helminths and anaerobic bacteria13 , 32. Its activity is associated with the inhibition of enzymatic activity of pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase (PEOR) and against the disulfide isomerase protein (PDI), an essential enzyme for anaerobic metabolism. However, the mode of action of NTZ and its principal metabolite, tizoxanide, on nematodes is unknown27. Its use has been approved for treatment of humans with diseases caused by Giardia intestinalis and Cryptosporidium 2 , 25, and DELGADO et al. 9 reported some efficacy against T. canis larvae in experimental infections. The results of this research suggest that the humoral immune response is not an appropriate parameter for evaluating drug efficacy in paratenic hosts experimentally infected by T. canis. However, at the end of the experiment, larval recovery was shown to be the most appropriate tool for evaluating drug efficacy in this experimental model. Considering the larval recovery results, the relative ineffectiveness of mebendazole or nitazoxanide administration in the treatment of Toxocara infections in the murine model is evident and this is probably true in the case of human infections by T. canis, which would result in visceral larva migrans syndrome. Despite these fairly moderate results, the greater reduction observed in the parasite load following mebendazole administration, compared with the results achieved when nitazoxanide was used, deserves some attention.
  28 in total

Review 1.  Nitazoxanide, a broad-spectrum thiazolide anti-infective agent for the treatment of gastrointestinal infections.

Authors:  Andrew Hemphill; Joachim Mueller; Marco Esposito
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 2.  Prevention and treatment of cryptosporidiosis in immunocompromised patients.

Authors:  I Abubakar; S H Aliyu; C Arumugam; P R Hunter; N K Usman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

3.  Preliminary evidence of nitazoxanide activity on Toxocara canis in a mouse model.

Authors:  Olinda M Delgado; Glory Fernandez; Sylvia Silva; Oriana Ramirez; Jesus Romero; Alfonso J Rodriguez-Morales
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 4.  How common is human toxocariasis? Towards standardizing our knowledge.

Authors:  Huw Smith; Celia Holland; Mervyn Taylor; J-F Magnaval; Peter Schantz; Rick Maizels
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2009-03-05

5.  In vivo evaluation of albendazole microspheres for the treatment of Toxocara canis larva migrans.

Authors:  María G Barrera; Darío Leonardi; Raul E Bolmaro; Claudia G Echenique; Alejandro C Olivieri; Claudio J Salomon; María C Lamas
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 5.571

6.  Nitazoxanide: a new thiazolide antiparasitic agent.

Authors:  LeAnne M Fox; Louis D Saravolatz
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Factors affecting disease manifestation of toxocarosis in humans: genetics and environment.

Authors:  Chia-Kwung Fan; Chien-Wei Liao; Yu-Chieh Cheng
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.738

8.  A novel Giardia lamblia nitroreductase, GlNR1, interacts with nitazoxanide and other thiazolides.

Authors:  Joachim Müller; Jonathan Wastling; Sanya Sanderson; Norbert Müller; Andrew Hemphill
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Evaluation of follow-up of therapy with fenbendazole incorporated into stabilized liposomes and immunomodulator glucan in mice infected with Toxocara canis larvae.

Authors:  G Hrckova; S Velebný; A Obwaller; H Auer; G Kogan
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2007-08-26       Impact factor: 3.112

10.  Brugia malayi: Effects of nitazoxanide and tizoxanide on adult worms and microfilariae of filarial nematodes.

Authors:  Ramakrishna U Rao; Yuefang Huang; Kerstin Fischer; Peter U Fischer; Gary J Weil
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 2.011

View more
  2 in total

1.  Therapy and Prevention for Human Toxocariasis.

Authors:  Jean-François Magnaval; Emilie Bouhsira; Judith Fillaux
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-01-22

Review 2.  Human Toxocariasis: 2010 to 2020 Contributions from Brazilian Researchers.

Authors:  Pedro Paulo Chieffi; Susana Angelica Zevallos Lescano; Gabriela Rodrigues E Fonseca; Sergio Vieira Dos Santos
Journal:  Res Rep Trop Med       Date:  2021-05-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.