Literature DB >> 26421783

Cephalometric Evaluation of Children with Allergic Rhinitis and Mouth Breathing.

Helena Afonso Agostinho1, Ivo Ãlvares Furtado2, Francisco Salvado Silva1, Josep Ustrell Torrent3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Orthodontists frequently treat children with mouth breathing. The purpose of the present study was to examine dental positions, skeletal effects and the pharyngeal airway space of children with chronic allergic rhinitis, when compared with a control group exhibiting a normal breathing pattern.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy Caucasian children from Santa Maria University Hospital - North Lisbon Hospital Center were evaluated, between September 2009 and February 2013. The study group comprised of 35 children with chronic allergic rhinitis, both genders, aged 5 - 14, with positive reaction to allergens, mouth breathing and malocclusion. The control group was composed of 35 children, both genders, displaying normal nasal breathing and malocclusion, who resorted to the orthodontic department. Measures of Ricketts, Steiner and McNamara's analysis were used and the t- Student test was applied to the data obtained.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed between the oral and nasal breathers, respectively: lower facial height (49.1/45.9 mm), Frankfurt â mandibular plane angle (30.1/26.9º) and Sela-Nasion - oclusal plane angle (17.3/15º), maxillary length (78.4/82.4 mm), mandibular length (102.4/107 mm), overbite (0.8/3.1mm) and overjet (4/4.7 mm). DISCUSSION: Comparison between the allergic rhinitis and control group showed that there is an increased lower facial height, larger Frankfurt â mandibular plane angle and Sela-Nasion oclusal plane angle in children with chronic allergic rhinitis. This group also had a shorter maxillary and mandibular length, less overbite and decreased upper airway space.
CONCLUSIONS: Children with allergic rhinitis and mouth breathing have longer faces, shorter maxillas and mandibles and a narrowed pharyngeal airway space. No statistical differences between the groups in sagital relationships or in dental inclinations were found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26421783     DOI: 10.20344/amp.5556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Med Port        ISSN: 0870-399X


  6 in total

Review 1.  Do breastfed children have a lower chance of developing mouth breathing? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cristiane Medianeira Savian; Gabriela Bohrer Bolsson; Graziela Botton; Raquel Pippi Antoniazzi; Rachel de Oliveira Rocha; Fabrício Batistin Zanatta; Bianca Zimmermann Santos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Increased risk of dental trauma in patients with allergic rhinitis: A nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Ming-Jhih Siao; Gunng-Shinng Chen; Wei-Cheng Lee; Jorng-Tzong Horng; Cheng-Wei Chang; Chung-Hsing Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  The role of craniofacial maldevelopment in the modern OSA epidemic: a scoping review.

Authors:  Jason L Yu; Akshay Tangutur; Eric Thuler; Marianna Evans; Raj C Dedhia
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  Effects of mouth breathing on maxillofacial and airway development in children and adolescents with different cervical vertebral maturation stages: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jiahua Li; Ziyi Zhao; Leilei Zheng; Baraa Daraqel; Jing Liu; Yun Hu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.747

5.  Malocclusion and rhinitis in children: an easy-going relationship or a yet to be resolved paradox? A systematic literature revision.

Authors:  Francesca Occasi; Ludovica Perri; Matteo Saccucci; Gabriele Di Carlo; Gaetano Ierardo; Valeria Luzzi; Giovanna De Castro; Giulia Brindisi; Lorenzo Loffredo; Marzia Duse; Antonella Polimeni; Anna Maria Zicari
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.638

6.  Effects of mouth breathing on facial skeletal development in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ziyi Zhao; Leilei Zheng; Xiaoya Huang; Caiyu Li; Jing Liu; Yun Hu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.757

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.