Literature DB >> 26421756

Phosphorus flows and balances of the European Union Member States.

Kimo C van Dijk1, Jan Peter Lesschen2, Oene Oenema3.   

Abstract

Global society faces serious "phosphorus challenges" given the scarcity, essentiality, unequal global distribution and, at the same time, regional excess of phosphorus (P). Phosphorus flow studies can be used to analyze these challenges, providing insight into how society (re)uses and loses phosphorus, identifying potential solutions. Phosphorus flows were analyzed in detail for EU-27 and its Member States. To quantify food system and non-food flows, country specific data and historical context were considered. The sectors covered were crop production (CP), animal production (AP), food processing (FP), non-food production (NF) and consumption (HC). The results show that the EU-27 imported 2392 Gg P in 2005, half of which accumulated in agricultural soils (924 Gg) and half was lost as waste (1217 Gg). Net accumulation was 4.9 kg P/ha/year ranging between +23.2 (Belgium) and -2.8 (Slovakia). From the system losses, 54% was lost from HC in diverse waste flows and 28% from FP, mainly through incinerated slaughter residues. The largest HC losses (655 Gg) were wastewater (55%), food waste (27%), and pet excreta (11%). Phosphorus recycling rates were 73% in AP, 29% in FP, 21% in HC and ~0% in NF. The phosphorus use efficiencies showed that, relative to sector input, about 70% was taken up by crops (CP), 24% was retained in animals (AP), 52% was contained in food products (FP), 76% was stored in non-food materials (NF), and 21% was recycled (HC). Although wide-ranging variation between countries, generally phosphorus use in EU-27 was characterized by relatively (1) large dependency on (primary) imports, (2) long-term accumulation in agricultural soils, especially in west European countries, (3) leaky losses throughout entire society, especially emissions to the environment and sequestered waste, (4) little recycling with the exception of manure, and (5) low use efficiencies, because of aforementioned issues, providing ample opportunities for improvement.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agricultural balance; EU-27; Europe; Food system; Nutrient use efficiency; Phosphorus cycle; Resource management; Substance flow analyses

Year:  2015        PMID: 26421756     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  19 in total

1.  Linking terrestrial phosphorus inputs to riverine export across the United States.

Authors:  Genevieve S Metson; Jiajia Lin; John A Harrison; Jana E Compton
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  A national assessment of the effect of intensive agro-land use practices on nonpoint source pollution using emission scenarios and geo-spatial data.

Authors:  Dong Zhuo; Liming Liu; Huirong Yu; Chengcheng Yuan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Drivers of Phosphorus Uptake by Barley Following Secondary Resource Application.

Authors:  Eva Brod; Anne Falk Øgaard; Tore Krogstad; Trond Knapp Haraldsen; Emmanuel Frossard; Astrid Oberson
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2016-05-12

4.  Visualizing Alternative Phosphorus Scenarios for Future Food Security.

Authors:  Tina-Simone Neset; Dana Cordell; Steve Mohr; Froggi VanRiper; Stuart White
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2016-10-28

5.  Added Values of Time Series in Material Flow Analysis: The Austrian Phosphorus Budget from 1990 to 2011.

Authors:  Ottavia Zoboli; David Laner; Matthias Zessner; Helmut Rechberger
Journal:  J Ind Ecol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 6.946

6.  Phytoplankton can bypass nutrient reductions in eutrophic coastal water bodies.

Authors:  Maximilian Berthold; Ulf Karsten; Mario von Weber; Alexander Bachor; Rhena Schumann
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.129

7.  Inter- and intra-species intercropping of barley cultivars and legume species, as affected by soil phosphorus availability.

Authors:  Tegan Darch; Courtney D Giles; Martin S A Blackwell; Timothy S George; Lawrie K Brown; Daniel Menezes-Blackburn; Charles A Shand; Marc I Stutter; David G Lumsdon; Malika M Mezeli; Renate Wendler; Hao Zhang; Catherine Wearing; Patricia Cooper; Philip M Haygarth
Journal:  Plant Soil       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.192

8.  Potential Impact of Dietary Choices on Phosphorus Recycling and Global Phosphorus Footprints: The Case of the Average Australian City.

Authors:  Geneviève S Metson; Dana Cordell; Brad Ridoutt
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2016-08-26

Review 9.  Handling the phosphorus paradox in agriculture and natural ecosystems: Scarcity, necessity, and burden of P.

Authors:  Peter Leinweber; Ulrich Bathmann; Uwe Buczko; Caroline Douhaire; Bettina Eichler-Löbermann; Emmanuel Frossard; Felix Ekardt; Helen Jarvie; Inga Krämer; Christian Kabbe; Bernd Lennartz; Per-Erik Mellander; Günther Nausch; Hisao Ohtake; Jens Tränckner
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.129

10.  Transitions to sustainable management of phosphorus in Brazilian agriculture.

Authors:  Paul J A Withers; Marcos Rodrigues; Amin Soltangheisi; Teotonio S de Carvalho; Luiz R G Guilherme; Vinicius de M Benites; Luciano C Gatiboni; Djalma M G de Sousa; Rafael de S Nunes; Ciro A Rosolem; Fernando D Andreote; Adilson de Oliveira; Edson L M Coutinho; Paulo S Pavinato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.