Literature DB >> 26421252

Development and characterization of microsatellite loci in the pantropical fern Hypolepis punctata (Dennstaedtiaceae).

Hui Shang1, Ying Wang2, Yue-Hong Yan1.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Microsatellite loci were isolated in Hypolepis punctata (Dennstaedtiaceae) to further study the reproductive ecology of this species. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We developed 16 microsatellite loci from one sample of H. punctata using an enriched genomic library. These loci were characterized in 28 individuals. The number of alleles per locus ranged from two to 10, and the expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.036 to 0.845.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the microsatellite markers can facilitate further studies on inferring the phylogeography and population genetics of H. punctata and related species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dennstaedtiaceae; Hypolepis punctata; microsatellite; phylogeography; population genetics

Year:  2015        PMID: 26421252      PMCID: PMC4578377          DOI: 10.3732/apps.1500047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Plant Sci        ISSN: 2168-0450            Impact factor:   1.936


Hypolepis punctata (Thunb.) Mett. ex Kuhn (Dennstaedtiaceae), i.e., downy ground fern, is a green, densely hairy, and glandulous fern that is widely distributed in tropical and subtropical regions in Asia and the Pacific (Brownsey, 1987). This plant is used in Chinese traditional medicine and contains pterosin, which has a cytotoxic effect on cancer cells (Lai, 2003). However, this species is often confused with H. polypodioides (Blume) Hook. and H. resistens (Kunze) Hook. (Xing and Wang, 2013), and using chloroplast markers (rbcL, matK, trnL-F, and psbA-trnH) is ineffective in improving identification accuracy (Shang et al., unpublished data). Moreover, H. punctata is an ideal species for studying mating system and sexual resource allocation because it exhibits high spore production and cloning habit. In addition, the wide distribution of this species may provide insight into the long-distance dispersal of homosporous ferns. Nuclear microsatellite markers are known as versatile molecular tools for ferns to solve the problem of inferring phylogeography or population genetics (Jiménez et al., 2008). In this study, we report on the development of 16 microsatellite markers for H. punctata to contribute to reproductive ecology and species differentiation research in the genus Hypolepis Bernh.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Total genomic DNA was extracted from the silica gel–dried leaves of an individual H. punctata specimen (voucher no.: JSL-WLSQ522; Appendix 1) collected from Wuling Mountain in Sangzhi County, Hunan Province, China, using a Plant Genomic DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). A microsatellite-enriched library was built following the method presented by Glenn and Schable (2005) with slight modifications. Genomic DNA was digested with RsaI and XmnI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA) at 37°C overnight and subsequently ligated to the double-stranded adapter (forward 5′-GTTTAAGGCCTAGCTAGCAGAATC-3′, reverse 5′-pGATTCTGCTAGCTAGGCCTTAAACAAA-3′). The ligated DNA was randomly linked to one of the two single-stranded biotinylated microsatellite probes (5′-(CA) 15-Biotin, 5′-(GA) 15-Biotin). The hybridized DNA was then captured by streptavidin-coated paramagnetic beads (Dynabeads M-280 Streptavidin; Dynal Biotech, Oslo, Norway) and gathered using a magnetic particle-collecting unit (DynaMag-2 Magnet 12321D; Invitrogen, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). The enriched DNA was amplified using the forward adapter as the primer. The product was then purified, ligated into the pGEM-T Easy Vector System (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), and cloned in Chemically Competent TOP10 E. coli cells (Tiangen Biotech). A total of 135 clones were selected and sequenced, in which 107 (∼80%) contained simple sequence repeats. Among these, 83 had suitable lengths for primer design using Premier 5.0 (PREMIER Biosoft International, Palo Alto, California, USA). PCR amplifications were performed in 15-μL total volume with ∼70 ng of genomic DNA, 10 μM of each primer, and 1× PCR mix (Tiangen Biotech). The PCR program consisted of 5 min of initial denaturation at 95°C, followed by 10 cycles of pre-PCR processing that involved 30 s of denaturation at 94°C, 30 s of annealing at 60°C, and 30 s of primer extension reaction at 72°C. The annealing temperature was reduced by 1°C per cycle. PCR amplification was continued for 25 more cycles at a constant annealing temperature of 50°C, and a final extension was performed at 72°C for 10 min. Finally, 16 pairs of primers (Table 1) were selected because they showed the clear bands of a single locus after agarose gel electrophoresis. The forward primer was labeled using one of the fluorescent dyes (FAM, TAMRA, or HEX) to detect polymorphism on an ABI 3730xl DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA).
Table 1.

Characteristics of 16 microsatellite loci developed in Hypolepis punctata.

LocusPrimer sequences (5′–3′)Repeat motifAllele size range (bp)GenBank accession no.
SHH02F: GTTGTCGTAATCCGCAAAGTGG(TC)19292–294KR270806
R: CAGATATGAGCGTCATTATCTCGGT
SHH13F: CATGGATTTGTTCTCCCTATCTGC(GA)39362–378KR270807
R: TGGCCTTTGGGGAACCTTAGTA
SHH17F: CAGCAGCAGAGGAACCTGACA(CT)15445–447KR270808
R: ATTGCGAACCACCCATTGAC
SHH19F: TTGATGCCTCCATGACTATGCT(CA)24264–288KR270809
R: TCACCTGTCCTCCCTAACTTCT
SHH23F: CGGAGCGGAAAGGTAGAACA(AC)6AT(AC)3235–245KR270810
R: TTTTGCCACTATTGCTGATGAA
SHH33F: TCTCCCTCCCTCGATCTCCTT(CT)17246–258KR270811
R: ATGTGGTGCTTCTAGCTGCTGAC
SHH34F: AACCGTAACAGACGTGCAAACC(CT)20(CA)9441–453KR270812
R: TGTGAGAAGCAGCAAGTCCAAA
SHH44F: TGGTATCATAGGCCATTTTGTCC(CT)17(CA)13172–196KR270813
R: TAGAGGAGGGAGATGCATTGAGA
SHH46F: GGAATAAACCATGTAGGCAAGAGC(GA)13121–123KR270814
R: CCAACGAGCCATGTGGACAA
SHH51F: TAGCAGTAAATAGTTTGTTACGTGCCC(CA)6AA(CA)3246–249KR270815
R: CCATCCGTTGTTGCCCCAT
SHH55F: GGAATCGCCAAGGAGATAATAA(AG)12413–422KR270816
R: CCCTCTTTTCTCAATCTATGTCCC
SHH56F: AGAAGATGCTTGTCATAAGTAGGG(CT)20421–438KR270817
R: AATGCTCAAGTCAAAAGTGCC
SHH65F: TCGATAGTGTTCGCGGGTAA(CT)23(CA)11271–283KR270818
R: GGGCATGGTGGTGACAAAGT
SHH71F: TTTCGTCTAAATCATGCTCTTTCC(CT)16293–301KR270819
R: GCCTGTCTCGCTACCCGTAT
SHH77F: GATGAATAAAAGAACTTAAACCAAC(CA)10439–451KR270820
R: AGCAAGAAAGGGAGAACGAG
SHH78F: ACAGTGATGGAAGGCTGAAAGTC(CT)10238–242KR270821
Characteristics of 16 microsatellite loci developed in Hypolepis punctata. To test marker efficiency, we used 28 individuals of H. punctata from three different populations (five individuals from Wuling Mountain [voucher: JSL-WLSQ522]; 16 from Nanling Mountain [voucher: YYH13169]; and seven from Bawangling Mountain, Hainan Island, China [voucher: SG2984]; Appendix 1). Samples were collected from different individuals, with a minimum interval of 100 m between them, to avoid sampling the same clone. The numbers of alleles per locus, observed heterozygosity, and expected heterozygosity were estimated using CERVUS 3.0 (Kalinowski et al., 2007). In addition, cross-amplifications were performed to test the transferability of the marker to five other Hypolepis species (two individuals of H. polypodioides [vouchers: SG765, SG767], one individual of H. resistens [voucher: SG2900], one individual of H. tenuifolia (G. Forst.) Bernh. [voucher: HN31], two individuals of H. pallida (Blume) Hook. [vouchers: YYH11628, YYH11629], and one individual of H. brooksiae Alderw. [voucher: SIWS19]; Appendix 1). The number of alleles per locus ranged from two to 10, with an average of 4.75 (Table 2). Meanwhile, 14 of the loci presented a significant bias between the observed and expected heterozygosities, which might indicate selfing in these populations (Table 2). Furthermore, at least six loci were interspecifically amplifiable in each of the other five species. In particular, all 16 loci were amplifiable for H. polypodioides (Table 3).
Table 2.

Genetic properties of the 16 newly developed microsatellites of Hypolepis punctata.

Total (n = 28)Hainan (n = 7)Wuling (n = 5)Nanling (n = 16)
LocusAHoHeAHoHeAHoHeAHoHe
SHH0220.0360.03610.0000.00010.0000.00020.0630.063
SHH13100.1430.84330.1430.38530.2000.64490.1250.815
SHH1730.0710.49120.0000.26420.2000.55630.0630.179
SHH1960.1430.80530.1430.64830.2000.73340.1250.667
SHH2330.1430.13710.0000.00020.4000.35630.1250.123
SHH3370.1790.76040.2860.39620.0000.53340.1880.692
SHH3460.1430.73220.0000.44030.4000.64430.1250.573
SHH4450.1430.75920.1430.49520.2000.55640.1250.718
SHH4620.1430.46820.1430.14320.2000.55630.1880.534
SHH5130.0710.39020.1430.14310.0000.00020.0630.063
SHH5550.1430.60640.1430.49520.2000.20020.1250.444
SHH5680.1430.84560.0000.87940.4000.71150.1250.810
SHH6560.1430.77920.1430.14320.2000.20040.1250.756
SHH7140.0710.53830.1430.27520.2000.20030.0000.331
SHH7740.0710.61010.0000.00010.0000.00030.1250.486
SHH7820.0360.36320.1430.14310.0000.00010.0000.000

Note: A = number of sampled alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity.

Table 3.

Cross-amplification length (in base pairs) of 16 microsatellite loci from Hypolepis punctata in other Hypolepis species.

LocusH. polypodioides (n = 2)H. resistens (n = 1)H. tenuifolia (n = 1)H. pallida (n = 2)H. brooksiae (n = 1)
SHH02292292278–292292
SHH13366–368382382372
SHH17443485447–449
SHH19264–272290
SHH23235–243233–235225227–239239
SHH33248276
SHH34449457
SHH44150140152
SHH46121111–113149115121–123
SHH51246287
SHH55416421–423
SHH56431–433425417429–431
SHH65273–281277281–283
SHH71293293
SHH77443449445
SHH78238240

Note: — = failed amplification; n = number of individuals sampled.

Genetic properties of the 16 newly developed microsatellites of Hypolepis punctata. Note: A = number of sampled alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity. Cross-amplification length (in base pairs) of 16 microsatellite loci from Hypolepis punctata in other Hypolepis species. Note: — = failed amplification; n = number of individuals sampled.

CONCLUSIONS

A total of 16 polymorphic microsatellite loci were newly developed and characterized for H. punctata. These polymorphic microsatellite loci may provide good references for analyzing mating systems and population structures, identifying clones, estimating gene flow, and identifying related species. This research will considerably improve knowledge on the life history of ferns. In addition, the high transferability of these loci to other species from the genus Hypolepis is essential for future research on hybridization or speciation.
Appendix 1.

Voucher and locality information of all Hypolepis samples used in this study.

SpeciesVoucher no.LocalityGeographic coordinates
H. punctata (Thunb.) Mett. ex KuhnJSL-WLSQ522Wuling Mountain, Hunan, China29°18′31″N, 110°6′52″E
YYH13169Nanling Mountain, Guangdong, China24°43′24″N, 114°15′46″E
SG2984Bawangling Mountain, Hainan, China19°5′49″N, 109°13′32″E
H. polypodioides (Blume) Hook.SG765, SG767Fanjingshan Mountain, Guizhou, China27°55′44″N, 108°41′17″E
H. resistens (Kunze) Hook.SG2900Bawangling Mountain, Hainan, China19°5′28″N, 109°10′59″E
H. tenuifolia (G. Forst.) Bernh.HN31Wuzhishan Mountain, Hainan, China18°55′1″N, 109°42′13″E
H. pallida (Blume) Hook.YYH11628, YYH11629Nantou County, Taiwan, ChinaNA
H. brooksiae Alderw.SIWS19Celebes Island, IndonesiaNA

Note: NA = not available.

aSpecimens are deposited at the Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden Herbarium (CSH), except for voucher SIWS19, which is deposited at the Chinese National Herbarium, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (PE).

  3 in total

1.  Isolating microsatellite DNA loci.

Authors:  Travis C Glenn; Nancy A Schable
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment.

Authors:  Steven T Kalinowski; Mark L Taper; Tristan C Marshall
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Reproductive and competitive interactions among gametophytes of the allotetraploid fern Dryopteris corleyi and its two diploid parents.

Authors:  Ares Jiménez; Luis G Quintanilla; Santiago Pajarón; Emilia Pangua
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 4.357

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.