| Literature DB >> 26421237 |
Sarah F Ackley1, Fengchen Liu2, Travis C Porco1, Caitlin S Pepperell3.
Abstract
Late 19th century epidemics of tuberculosis (TB) in Western Canadian First Nations resulted in peak TB mortality rates more than six times the highest rates recorded in Europe. Using a mathematical modeling approach and historical TB mortality time series, we investigate potential causes of high TB mortality and rapid epidemic decline in First Nations from 1885 to 1940. We explore two potential causes of dramatic epidemic dynamics observed in this setting: first, we explore effects of famine prior to 1900 on both TB and population dynamics. Malnutrition is recognized as an individual-level risk factor for TB progression and mortality; its population-level effects on TB epidemics have not been explored previously. Second, we explore effects of heterogeneity in susceptibility to TB in two ways: modeling heterogeneity in susceptibility to infection, and heterogeneity in risk of developing disease once infected. Our results indicate that models lacking famine-related changes in TB parameters or heterogeneity result in an implausibly poor fit to both the TB mortality time series and census data; the inclusion of these features allows for the characteristic decline and rise in population observed in First Nations during this time period and confers improved fits to TB mortality data.Entities:
Keywords: Epidemics; First Nations; Genetic predisposition to disease; Malnutrition; Mathematical model; Tuberculosis
Year: 2015 PMID: 26421237 PMCID: PMC4586807 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1237
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Transmission diagram.
Representation of compartmental TB models 0, 1, 2, and 3. Individuals who are more genetically susceptible are in the primed states, whereas less genetically susceptible individuals are in the unprimed states. S, L, T, T, and R represent the numbers of people in the susceptible, latent, infectious active disease, non-infectious active disease, and recovered groups, respectively, as a function of time for the less susceptible group. S′, L′, , , and R′ represent the numbers of people in the susceptible, latent, infectious active disease, non-infectious active disease, and recovered groups, respectively, as a function of time for the more susceptible group. Model parameters are given in Table 1. For models 0 and 1, no individuals start out in S′, and thus all primed states remain empty. For models 2 and 3, a fraction of individuals start in S′. For model 2, σ ≠ 0 and y = 0. For model 3, σ = 0 and y ≠ 0. For simplicity, background mortality and TB specific mortality were omitted from the diagram.
Parameters and associated ranges.
| Parameter name | Description | Minimum | Maximum | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Effective contact rate, average number of cases caused by one case in a fully susceptible population (per year per infectious case) | 2 | 20 | ( |
|
| Proportion of new infections that develop disease within a year, for susceptible and latent individuals (post-famine) | 0 | 0.30 | ( |
|
| Probability of developing infectious TB for individuals who develop active disease | 0.5 | 0.85 | ( |
|
| Fractional protection conferred by latent infection to reinfection (post-famine) | 0.0 | 0.8 | ( |
|
| Rate of progression from latent to active disease (post-famine) (per year) | 0.00256 | 0.00527 | ( |
|
| Background mortality rate (post-famine) (per year) | 0.015 | 0.03 | ( |
|
| TB mortality rate (post-famine) (per year) | 0.2 | 0.7 | ( |
|
| Self-cure rate (per year) | 0.021 | 0.086 | ( |
|
| Relapse rate (per year) | 0.01 | 0.03 | ( |
|
| Factor by which susceptibility to infection among more susceptible individuals is increased | 1 | 1,000 | |
|
| Factor by which risk of progression among more susceptible individuals is increased | 1 | 1,000 | |
|
| Fraction of individuals with increased susceptibility to TB infection at the start of the epidemic or with increased risk of progression at the start of the epidemic | 0 | 1 | |
| Λ | Birth rate (post-famine) (births per 1,000 population per year) | 30 | 50 | ( |
|
| Factor by which famine conditions increased | 1 | 3 | |
|
| Factor by which famine conditions increased | 1 | 3 | |
|
| Factor by which famine conditions increased | 1 | 3 | |
|
| Factor by which famine conditions increased | 1 | 3 | |
|
| Factor by which famine conditions decreased | 0.3 | 1 | |
|
| Percent increase in | 0% | 2% | ( |
|
| Factor by which famine conditions decreased the birth rate | 0.3 | 1 | |
|
| Start time of epidemic for cluster 1 | 1870 | 1883 | ( |
|
| Start time of epidemic for cluster 2 | 1870 | 1883 | ( |
|
| Starting population of cluster 1 | 800 | 1,600 | Census data |
|
| Starting population of cluster 2 | 400 | 1,200 | Census data |
|
| Time when famine conditions improved | 1895 | 1905 | ( |
Notes.
See associated δ parameter since this quantity described by this parameter changes over time.
See associated δ parameter and ϵ since the quantity described by this parameter changes pre-/post- famine.
Parameter estimates.
Parameter estimates for the baseline model, famine model, intrinsic immunity model, and adaptive immunity model, respectively, to two significant figures (or the nearest year). Discrepancies are given to the nearest tenth. Best parameter estimates were obtained from optimization. Intervals were estimated from the 2.5%ile and 97.5%ile of the fits to the bootstrap data sets.
| Parameter | Description | Model 0 | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best estimate (interval) | Best estimate (interval) | Best estimate (interval) | Best estimate (interval) | ||
|
| Proportion of new infections or new reinfections that develop disease within a year, for susceptible, latent, and recovered individuals (post-famine) | 0.30 (0.30, 0.30) | 0.26 (0.19, 0.27) | 0.042 (0.028, 0.054) | 0.18 (0.10, 0.23) |
|
| Effective contact rate, average number of cases caused by one case in a fully susceptible population (per year per infectious case) | 10 (9.5, 18) | 3.4 (2.0, 4.1) | 2.7 (2.2, 4.1) | 2.43 (2.2, 3.2) |
|
| Fraction of individuals with normal (lower) susceptibility to TB infection at the start of the epidemic | – | – | 0.20 (0.18, 0.26) | 0.40 (0.30, 0.50) |
|
| Start time of epidemic for cluster 1 | 1870 (1870, 1875) | 1872 (1870, 1875) | 1873 (1872, 1877) | 1873 (1871, 1878) |
|
| Factor by which famine conditions increased | – | 2.3 (2.3, 3.0) | – | – |
|
| Start time of epidemic for cluster 2 | 1870 (1870, 1870) | 1872 (1870, 1872) | 1872 (1870, 1875) | 1872 (1870, 1876) |
|
| Fractional protection conferred by latent infection to reinfection (post-famine) | 0.80 (0.80, 0.80) | 0.80 (0.78, 0.80) | 0.74 (0.67, 0.78) | 0.51 (0.00, 0.78) |
|
| Probability of developing infectious TB for individuals who develop active disease | 0.85 (0.50, 0.85) | 0.56 (0.50, 0.85) | – | – |
|
| TB mortality rate (post-famine) (per year) | 0.70 (0.59, 0.70) | – | – | – |
|
| Relative susceptibility to infection among more susceptible individuals compared with normally susceptible individuals | – | – | 46 (32, 71) | – |
|
| Factor by which risk of progression among more susceptible individuals is increased | – | – | – | 5.43 (4.42, 9.23) |
| Lowest discrepancy | 186.7 (136.5, 241.5) | 65.1 (45.5, 81.4) | 62.4 (44.7, 75.8) | 66.9 (46.4, 85.0) |
Notes.
For each model, the seven most important parameters relevant to that model were fit to the data. For models 2 and 3, f and μTB were dropped in order to include s and σ and s and γ, respectively. For model 1, μTB was dropped in order to include δ.
Figure 2Model fits to the TB mortality time series and census data.
Model fits to the TB mortality time series and census data for clusters 1 and 2 on the left (A and B, respectively) and right (C and D, respectively), respectively, and for models 0, 1, 2, and 3. Model 0 yields an implausibly poor fit to the TB mortality time series and census data, while models 1, 2, and 3 confer better fits, capturing the characteristic demographic decline and rise.
Figure 3Graph of the populations of five groups of reserves (agencies) from 1884 to 1920 (Lux, 2001).
For the census data for clusters 1 and 2, refer to Fig. 2. For four of the five agencies, populations decline following the onset of famine; most begin to recover around 1900.
Figure 4The effect of heterogeneity on population dynamics.
Using the parameters from model 2’s best fit, as we decrease the relative increased susceptibility of the more susceptible group (σ) while keeping the mean susceptibility at the start of the epidemic constant, we see that the population decreases relative to model 2’s best fit. Greater heterogeneity allows us to reproduce the qualitative trend in population numbers of a sharp decrease in numbers followed by a slow increase.
Figure 5The effect of combinations of famine-related parameters on TB dynamics.
Setting the effective contact rate (β) to 3.2, the relative increased susceptibility of the more susceptible group (σ) to 10, other famine-related parameters to their null values, and all remaining parameters to their midpoint values with no famine end time, we explore the dynamical effect of certain combinations of famine-related parameters on TB dynamics. For both graphs, curve 1 shows the TB mortality curve with no famine-related changes in parameters. (A) A three-fold increase in the background mortality (δ = 3) rate leads to a decrease in the number of TB mortalities since death due to non-TB causes depletes those at-risk for TB death (curve 2). A three-fold decrease in immunity conferred by latency (δ = 0.3) results in more TB mortalities since more individuals become infected (curve 3). However, a three-fold increase in the background mortality rate in combination with a three-fold decrease in immunity conferred by latency results in a minimal change to the TB mortality curve (curve 4). (B) A 25% increase in the probability of fast-progression (δ = 1.25) leads to an increase in the model-predicted number of TB mortalities during the first few years of the epidemic (curve 2). However, somewhat paradoxically, higher TB death rates do not necessarily lead to increased TB mortality at population-level. This is due to the fact that with lower TB death rates individuals with TB are infectious for more time and thus are able to infect more individuals, ultimately leading to a greater number of TB deaths in the population. With a two-fold increase in the TB death rate (δ( = 2), we see fewer TB mortalities (curve 3). However, a two-fold increase in the TB death rate in combination with a 25% increase in the probability of fast progression results in a minimal change to the TB mortality curve (curve 4).