Literature DB >> 26421107

Triradiate caecal fold: Is it a useful landmark for caecal intubation in colonoscopy?

Andrew Finlayson1, Raaj Chandra1, Ian A Hastie1, Ian T Jones1, Susan Shedda1, Michael K-Y Hong1, Aileen Yen1, Ian P Hayes1.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the frequency of identification of the triradiate fold during colonoscopy and evaluate its reliability as a marker of caecal intubation.
METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy in a tertiary hospital colorectal unit from May to September 2013 were studied. Video documentation of the caecum was recorded and shown to consultant colorectal surgeons on the unit. Each reviewer was asked through a series of questions to independently identify the triradiate fold. The main outcome was the frequency of visualisation of the triradiate fold in the caecum.
RESULTS: The triradiate fold was seen on average in 18% of cases, but inter-observer agreement was poor. There were only four patients (4%) in which all reviewers agreed on the presence of a triradiate fold. In patients who had undergone previous appendicectomy, the appendiceal orifice was less frequently seen compared with patients who had not undergone appendicectomy.
CONCLUSION: The triradiate fold is infrequently seen during colonoscopy and is therefore an unreliable landmark of caecal intubation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appendiceal orifice; Caecal intubation; Colonoscopy; Prospective study; Triradiate fold

Year:  2015        PMID: 26421107      PMCID: PMC4580952          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i13.1103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  7 in total

1.  Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: a prospective study.

Authors:  D K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Quality in colonoscopy reporting: an assessment of compliance and performance improvement.

Authors:  Susan G Coe; Chakri Panjala; Michael G Heckman; Mihir Patel; Bashar J Qumseya; Yize R Wang; Benjamin Dalton; Philip Tran; William Palmer; Nancy Diehl; Michael B Wallace; Massimo Raimondo
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 4.088

3.  What are the sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic photographs in determining completion of colonoscopy? Results from an online questionnaire.

Authors:  Adrian I Thuraisingam; Jonathan L Brown; John T Anderson
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.566

4.  Confirmation of complete colonoscopy without intubation of the ileum.

Authors: 
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 5.  Confirmation of cecal intubation during colonoscopy.

Authors:  W C Cirocco; L C Rusin
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Quality assurance in colonoscopy: role of endomucosal clips.

Authors:  S Maslekar; G Avery; G S Duthie
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Predictive factors affecting cecal intubation failure in colonoscopy trainees.

Authors:  Hong-Jun Park; Jin-Heon Hong; Hyun-Soo Kim; Bo-Ra Kim; So-Yeon Park; Ki-Won Jo; Jae-Woo Kim
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Effects of fermented wheat bran and yeast culture on growth performance, immunity, and intestinal microflora in growing-finishing pigs.

Authors:  Wei He; Yanan Gao; Zhiqiang Guo; Zheng Yang; Xiaoxu Wang; Honggui Liu; Haoyang Sun; Baoming Shi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.338

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.