OBJECTIVE: Endovascular treatment (EVT) using a popliteal approach is effective for superficial femoral artery (SFA) chronic total occlusion (CTO); however, its effectiveness, safety, and consequent complications are unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 324 consecutive EVTs (in 187 patients) performed at three centers between April 2008 and March 2013, and selected all EVTs that included SFA CTO regions. A total of 91 EVTs (in 65 patients) were included and divided into two groups; "with popliteal approach" (WPA) and "without popliteal approach" (WOPA). RESULTS: Despite higher rates of hypertension (WPA, 88.9% vs. WOPA, 69.1%; p = 0.04) and CTO length >200 mm (55.6% vs. 28.3%, respectively; p <0.01), the primary success rate was better in the WPA group (97.2% vs. 78.2%, respectively; p <0.01); however, both total complication rate and major complication rate were not significantly different. We compared popliteal puncture using a sheath and using a microcatheter alone. There were no significant differences between sheath and microcatheter use in terms of primary success rates (95.5% vs. 100%, respectively; p = 0.61) and puncture site complications (22.7% vs. 14.2%, respectively; p = 0.53). CONCLUSION: A popliteal approach improved the primary success rate of EVT for SFA CTO.
OBJECTIVE: Endovascular treatment (EVT) using a popliteal approach is effective for superficial femoral artery (SFA) chronic total occlusion (CTO); however, its effectiveness, safety, and consequent complications are unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 324 consecutive EVTs (in 187 patients) performed at three centers between April 2008 and March 2013, and selected all EVTs that included SFA CTO regions. A total of 91 EVTs (in 65 patients) were included and divided into two groups; "with popliteal approach" (WPA) and "without popliteal approach" (WOPA). RESULTS: Despite higher rates of hypertension (WPA, 88.9% vs. WOPA, 69.1%; p = 0.04) and CTO length >200 mm (55.6% vs. 28.3%, respectively; p <0.01), the primary success rate was better in the WPA group (97.2% vs. 78.2%, respectively; p <0.01); however, both total complication rate and major complication rate were not significantly different. We compared popliteal puncture using a sheath and using a microcatheter alone. There were no significant differences between sheath and microcatheter use in terms of primary success rates (95.5% vs. 100%, respectively; p = 0.61) and puncture site complications (22.7% vs. 14.2%, respectively; p = 0.53). CONCLUSION: A popliteal approach improved the primary success rate of EVT for SFA CTO.
Authors: T Zeller; N Saratzis; D Scheinert; E Minar; J P Beregi; M Schillinger; H A Hausegger; M Amor; P Quaretti; R Moratto; C Dorange; E Boone; H Krankenberg Journal: J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 1.888
Authors: Martin Schillinger; Markus Exner; Wolfgang Mlekusch; Jasmin Amighi; Schila Sabeti; Marcus Muellner; Helmut Rumpold; Oswald Wagner; Erich Minar Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 29.983