Literature DB >> 26420736

Diagnostic Accuracy of 2-Dimensional Computed Tomography for Articular Involvement and Fracture Pattern of Posterior Malleolar Fractures.

Diederik T Meijer1, Robert-Jan O de Muinck Keizer2, Job N Doornberg3, Inger N Sierevelt4, Sjoerd A Stufkens3, Gino M M J Kerkhoffs5, C Niek van Dijk6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Up to 44% of ankle fractures have involvement of the posterior tibial margin. Fracture size and morphology are important factors to guide treatment of these fragments, but reliability of plain radiography in estimating size is low. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the accuracy of 2-dimensional computed tomography (2DCT) in the assessment of posterior malleolar fractures. Additionally, the diagnostic accuracy of 2DCT and its value in preoperative planning was evaluated.
METHODS: Thirty-one patients with 31 ankle fractures including a posterior malleolar fragment were selected. Preoperative CT scans were analyzed by 50 observers from 23 countries. Quantitative 3-dimensional CT (Q3DCT) reconstructions were used as a reference standard.
RESULTS: Articular involvement of the posterior fragment was overestimated on 2DCT by factors 1.6, 1.4, and 2.2 for Haraguchi types I, II, and III, respectively. Interobserver agreement on operative management ("to fix, or not to fix?") was substantial (κ = 0.69) for Haraguchi type I fractures, fair (κ = 0.23) for type II fractures, and poor (κ = 0.09) for type III fractures. 2DCT images led to a change in treatment of the posterior malleolus in 23% of all fractures. Surgeons would operatively treat type I fractures in 63%, type II fractures in 67%, and type III fractures in 22%.
CONCLUSION: Surgeons overestimated true articular involvement of posterior malleolar fractures on 2DCT scans. 2DCT showed some additional value in estimating the involved articular surface when compared to plain radiographs; however, this seemed not yet sufficient to accurately read the fractures. Analysis of the CT images showed a significant influence on choice of treatment in 23% with a shift toward operative treatment in 12% of cases compared to evaluating plain lateral radiographs alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative study.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Haraguchi classification; computed tomography; posterior malleolar fracture; quantitative 3-dimensional CT

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26420736     DOI: 10.1177/1071100715603999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  5 in total

1.  The treatment options for posterior malleolar fractures in tibial spiral fractures.

Authors:  Jialiang Guo; Lei Liu; Zongyou Yang; Zhiyong Hou; Wei Chen; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Established classification systems of posterior malleolar fractures : A systematic literature review].

Authors:  Elena Müller; Julia Terstegen; Holger Kleinertz; Hanneke Weel; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Alexej Barg; Carsten Schlickewei
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Ankle CT scan allows better management of posterior malleolus fractures than X-rays.

Authors:  Pierre-Alban Bouche; Nicolas Gaujac; Simon Corsia; Philippe Leclerc; Philippe Anract; Guillaume Auberger
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-09-01

4.  Medium-sized posterior fragments in AO Weber-B fractures, does open reduction and fixation improve outcome? the POSTFIX-trial protocol, a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sander Verhage; Peer van der Zwaal; Maarten Bronkhorst; Huub van der Meulen; Sanne Kleinveld; Sven Meylaerts; Steven Rhemrev; Pieta Krijnen; Inger Schipper; Jochem Hoogendoorn
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Traditional Approach vs Posterior Approach for Ankle Fractures Involving the Posterior Malleolus.

Authors:  Kristian Pilskog; Teresa Brnic Gote; Heid Elin Johannessen Odland; Knut Andreas Fjeldsgaard; Håvard Dale; Eivind Inderhaug; Jonas Meling Fevang
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.827

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.