Michele Dileone1, Federico Ranieri2, Lucia Florio2, Fioravante Capone2, Gabriella Musumeci2, Chiara Leoni3, Laura Mordillo-Mateos4, Marco Tartaglia5, Giuseppe Zampino3, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro2. 1. Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, SESCAM, Toledo, Spain; Department of Neurosciences, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy; CINAC, HM Puerta del Sur, Hospitales de Madrid, 28938 Móstoles, Spain. Electronic address: dileone.michele@ulssvicenza.it. 2. Institute of Neurology, Campus Biomedico University, Rome, Italy; Fondazione Alberto Sordi - Research Institute for Ageing, Rome, Italy. 3. Servizio di Epidemiologia e Clinica dei Difetti Congeniti Istituto di Clinica Pediatrica, Catholic University, Rome, Italy. 4. Department of Neurosciences, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy. 5. Dipartimento di Ematologia, Oncologia e Medicina Molecolare, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Costello syndrome (CS) is a rare congenital disorder due to a G12S amino acid substitution in HRAS protoncogene. Previous studies have shown that Paired Associative Stimulation (PAS), a repetitive brain stimulation protocol inducing motor cortex plasticity by coupling peripheral nerve stimulation with brain stimulation, leads to an extremely pronounced motor cortex excitability increase in CS patients. Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) represents a protocol able to induce motor cortex plasticity by trains of stimuli at 50 Hz. In healthy subjects PAS and iTBS produce similar after-effects in motor cortex excitability. Experimental models showed that HRAS-dependent signalling pathways differently affect LTP induced by different patterns of repetitive synaptic stimulation. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare iTBS-induced after-effects on motor cortex excitability with those produced by PAS in CS patients and to observe whether HRAS mutation differentially affects two different forms of neuromodulation protocols. METHODS: We evaluated in vivo after-effects induced by PAS and iTBS applied over the right motor cortex in 4 CS patients and in 21 healthy age-matched controls. RESULTS: Our findings confirmed HRAS-dependent extremely pronounced PAS-induced after-effects and showed for the first time that iTBS induces no change in MEP amplitude in CS patients whereas both protocols lead to an increase of about 50% in controls. CONCLUSIONS: CS patients are characterized by an impairment of iTBS-related LTP-like phenomena besides enhanced PAS-induced after-effects, suggesting that HRAS-dependent signalling pathways have a differential influence on PAS- and iTBS-induced plasticity in humans.
BACKGROUND:Costello syndrome (CS) is a rare congenital disorder due to a G12S amino acid substitution in HRAS protoncogene. Previous studies have shown that Paired Associative Stimulation (PAS), a repetitive brain stimulation protocol inducing motor cortex plasticity by coupling peripheral nerve stimulation with brain stimulation, leads to an extremely pronounced motor cortex excitability increase in CS patients. Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) represents a protocol able to induce motor cortex plasticity by trains of stimuli at 50 Hz. In healthy subjects PAS and iTBS produce similar after-effects in motor cortex excitability. Experimental models showed that HRAS-dependent signalling pathways differently affect LTP induced by different patterns of repetitive synaptic stimulation. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare iTBS-induced after-effects on motor cortex excitability with those produced by PAS in CS patients and to observe whether HRAS mutation differentially affects two different forms of neuromodulation protocols. METHODS: We evaluated in vivo after-effects induced by PAS and iTBS applied over the right motor cortex in 4 CS patients and in 21 healthy age-matched controls. RESULTS: Our findings confirmed HRAS-dependent extremely pronounced PAS-induced after-effects and showed for the first time that iTBS induces no change in MEP amplitude in CS patients whereas both protocols lead to an increase of about 50% in controls. CONCLUSIONS: CS patients are characterized by an impairment of iTBS-related LTP-like phenomena besides enhanced PAS-induced after-effects, suggesting that HRAS-dependent signalling pathways have a differential influence on PAS- and iTBS-induced plasticity in humans.
Authors: Daniel T Corp; Hannah G K Bereznicki; Gillian M Clark; George J Youssef; Peter J Fried; Ali Jannati; Charlotte B Davies; Joyce Gomes-Osman; Julie Stamm; Sung Wook Chung; Steven J Bowe; Nigel C Rogasch; Paul B Fitzgerald; Giacomo Koch; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Peter G Enticott Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 8.955