Literature DB >> 26419619

Predicting time to castration resistance in hormone sensitive prostate cancer by a personalization algorithm based on a mechanistic model integrating patient data.

Moran Elishmereni1,2, Yuri Kheifetz2, Ilan Shukrun2, Graham H Bevan3, Debashis Nandy3, Kyle M McKenzie3, Manish Kohli3, Zvia Agur1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a leading cause of cancer death of men worldwide. In hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is widely used, but an eventual failure on ADT heralds the passage to the castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) stage. Because predicting time to failure on ADT would allow improved planning of personal treatment strategy, we aimed to develop a predictive personalization algorithm for ADT efficacy in HSPC patients.
METHODS: A mathematical mechanistic model for HSPC progression and treatment was developed based on the underlying disease dynamics (represented by prostate-specific antigen; PSA) as affected by ADT. Following fine-tuning by a dataset of ADT-treated HSPC patients, the model was embedded in an algorithm, which predicts the patient's time to biochemical failure (BF) based on clinical metrics obtained before or early in-treatment.
RESULTS: The mechanistic model, including a tumor growth law with a dynamic power and an elaborate ADT-resistance mechanism, successfully retrieved individual time-courses of PSA (R(2) = 0.783). Using the personal Gleason score (GS) and PSA at diagnosis, as well as PSA dynamics from 6 months after ADT onset, and given the full ADT regimen, the personalization algorithm accurately predicted the individual time to BF of ADT in 90% of patients in the retrospective cohort (R(2) = 0.98).
CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm we have developed, predicting biochemical failure based on routine clinical tests, could be especially useful for patients destined for short-lived ADT responses and quick progression to CRPC. Prospective studies must validate the utility of the algorithm for clinical decision-making.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian estimation; androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); biochemical failure (BF); mathematical model; non-linear mixed-effect modeling (NLMEM)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26419619     DOI: 10.1002/pros.23099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  8 in total

1.  Modeling the Relationship Between Exposure to Abiraterone and Prostate-Specific Antigen Dynamics in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Xu Steven Xu; Charles J Ryan; Kim Stuyckens; Matthew R Smith; Fred Saad; Thomas W Griffin; Youn C Park; Margaret K Yu; Peter De Porre; An Vermeulen; Italo Poggesi; Partha Nandy
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  From Fitting the Average to Fitting the Individual: A Cautionary Tale for Mathematical Modelers.

Authors:  Michael C Luo; Elpiniki Nikolopoulou; Jana L Gevertz
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Predicting response to pembrolizumab in metastatic melanoma by a new personalization algorithm.

Authors:  Neta Tsur; Yuri Kogan; Evgenia Avizov-Khodak; Désirée Vaeth; Nils Vogler; Jochen Utikal; Michal Lotem; Zvia Agur
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 5.531

4.  Personal response to immune checkpoint inhibitors of patients with advanced melanoma explained by a computational model of cellular immunity, tumor growth, and drug.

Authors:  D Perlstein; O Shlagman; Y Kogan; K Halevi-Tobias; A Yakobson; I Lazarev; Z Agur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Nomogram Incorporating Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Predicting Time to the Development of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yun-Xin Zhao; Guang-Li Yao; Jian Sun; Xiao-Lian Wang; Ying Wang; Qiu-Qiong Cai; Hui-Li Kang; Li-Ping Gu; Jia-Shun Yu; Wen-Min Li; Bei Zhang; Jian Wang; Jiang-Jun Mei; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2021-10-08

6.  Intermittent Hormone Therapy Models Analysis and Bayesian Model Comparison for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  S Pasetto; H Enderling; R A Gatenby; R Brady-Nicholls
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 1.758

7.  Mathematical model of hormone sensitive prostate cancer treatment using leuprolide: A small step towards personalization.

Authors:  Urszula Foryś; Alon Nahshony; Moran Elishmereni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Intermediate PSA half-life after neoadjuvant hormone therapy predicts reduced risk of castration-resistant prostate cancer development after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yong Jin Kang; Won Sik Jang; Jong Kyou Kwon; Cheol Yong Yoon; Joo Yong Lee; Won Sik Ham; Young Deuk Choi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.