P Amiano1,2,3, S Chamosa2,1, N Etxezarreta3,1,2, L Arriola1,2,3, M-J Sánchez4,3, E Ardanaz5,3, E Molina-Montes4,3, M-D Chirlaque6,3, C Moreno-Iribas5,7, J-M Huerta6,3, N Egües2,8, C Navarro6,3,9, M Requena4, J-R Quirós10, A Fonseca-Nunes11, P Jakszyn11, C-A González11, M Dorronsoro1,2,3. 1. Public Health Department of Gipuzkoa, Government of the Basque Country, San Sebastian, Spain. 2. BioDonostia Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain. 3. Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública-CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain. 4. Andalusian School of Public Health and Biosanitary Research Institute of Granada (Granada.ibs), Granada, Spain. 5. Navarre Public Health Institute, Pamplona, Spain. 6. Department of Epidemiology, Murcia Regional Health Council, Murcia, Spain. 7. Research Network for Health Services in Chronic Disease (REDISSEC), Pamplona, Spain. 8. Donostia University Hospital, San Sebastian, Spain. 9. Department of Health and Social Sciences, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain. 10. Public Health and Health Planning Directorate, Oviedo, Spain. 11. Unit of Nutrition, Environment and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO-IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: High intakes of unprocessed red or processed meat may increase the risk of stroke. We aimed to examine the association between unprocessed red meat, processed meat and total red meat consumption and risk of total stroke and ischaemic stroke. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were conducted based on the data for 41,020 men and women aged 29-69 years at baseline. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 13.8 years, 674 incident cases of stroke (531 ischaemic strokes, 79 haemorrhagic strokes, 42 subarachnoid haemorrhages and 22 mixed or unspecified events) were identified. After multiple adjustment, unprocessed red meat, processed meat and total red meat consumption were not correlated with incidence of total stroke or ischaemic stroke in either men or women. The hazard ratios (HRs) for unprocessed red meat and processed meat and risk of total stroke comparing the highest with the lowest quintiles were, respectively, 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-1.21; P-trend=0.15) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.64-1.32; P-trend=0.82) in men and 1.21 (95% CI 0.79-1.85; P-trend=0.10) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.51-1.27; P-trend=0.17) in women. The HRs for unprocessed red meat and processed meat and risk of ischaemic stroke were, respectively, 0.80 (95% CI 0.51-1.25; P-trend=0.51) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.57-1.29; P-trend=0.77) in men and 1.24 (95% CI 0.74-2.05; P-trend=0.13) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.47-1.42; P-trend=0.31) in women. CONCLUSIONS: In the Spanish European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort, unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption were not associated with risk of stroke in men or women.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: High intakes of unprocessed red or processed meat may increase the risk of stroke. We aimed to examine the association between unprocessed red meat, processed meat and total red meat consumption and risk of total stroke and ischaemic stroke. SUBJECTS/ METHODS:Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were conducted based on the data for 41,020 men and women aged 29-69 years at baseline. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 13.8 years, 674 incident cases of stroke (531 ischaemic strokes, 79 haemorrhagic strokes, 42 subarachnoid haemorrhages and 22 mixed or unspecified events) were identified. After multiple adjustment, unprocessed red meat, processed meat and total red meat consumption were not correlated with incidence of total stroke or ischaemic stroke in either men or women. The hazard ratios (HRs) for unprocessed red meat and processed meat and risk of total stroke comparing the highest with the lowest quintiles were, respectively, 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-1.21; P-trend=0.15) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.64-1.32; P-trend=0.82) in men and 1.21 (95% CI 0.79-1.85; P-trend=0.10) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.51-1.27; P-trend=0.17) in women. The HRs for unprocessed red meat and processed meat and risk of ischaemic stroke were, respectively, 0.80 (95% CI 0.51-1.25; P-trend=0.51) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.57-1.29; P-trend=0.77) in men and 1.24 (95% CI 0.74-2.05; P-trend=0.13) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.47-1.42; P-trend=0.31) in women. CONCLUSIONS: In the Spanish European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort, unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption were not associated with risk of stroke in men or women.
Authors: An Pan; Qi Sun; Adam M Bernstein; Matthias B Schulze; JoAnn E Manson; Meir J Stampfer; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-03-12
Authors: Adam M Bernstein; Qi Sun; Frank B Hu; Meir J Stampfer; JoAnn E Manson; Walter C Willett Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-08-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Teresa T Fung; Meir J Stampfer; JoAnn E Manson; Kathryn M Rexrode; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: E Riboli; K J Hunt; N Slimani; P Ferrari; T Norat; M Fahey; U R Charrondière; B Hémon; C Casagrande; J Vignat; K Overvad; A Tjønneland; F Clavel-Chapelon; A Thiébaut; J Wahrendorf; H Boeing; D Trichopoulos; A Trichopoulou; P Vineis; D Palli; H B Bueno-De-Mesquita; P H M Peeters; E Lund; D Engeset; C A González; A Barricarte; G Berglund; G Hallmans; N E Day; T J Key; R Kaaks; R Saracci Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Stine K Venø; Christian S Bork; Marianne U Jakobsen; Søren Lundbye-Christensen; Flemming W Bach; Peter L McLennan; Anne Tjønneland; Erik B Schmidt; Kim Overvad Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-11-03 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Kyuwoong Kim; Junghyeon Hyeon; Sang Ah Lee; Sung Ok Kwon; Hyejin Lee; NaNa Keum; Jong-Koo Lee; Sang Min Park Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 5.501