| Literature DB >> 26418548 |
Abigail M Spear1, Emma M Davies, Christopher Taylor, Rachel Whiting, Sara Macildowie, Emrys Kirkman, Mark Midwinter, Sarah A Watts.
Abstract
Extremity injury is a significant burden to those injured in explosive incidents and local ischaemia can result in poor functionality in salvaged limbs. This study examined whether blast injury to a limb resulted in a change in endothelial phenotype leading to changes to the surrounding tissue.The hind limbs of terminally anaesthetized rabbits were subjected to one of four blast exposures (high, medium, low, or no blast). Blood samples were analyzed for circulating endothelial cells pre-injury and at 1, 6, and 11 h postinjury as well as analysis for endothelial activation pre-injury and at 1, 6, and 12 h postinjury. Post-mortem tissue (12 h post-injury) was analysed for both protein and mRNA expression and also for histopathology. The high blast group had significantly elevated levels of circulating endothelial cells 6 h postinjury. This group also had significantly elevated tissue mRNA expression of IL-6, E-selection, TNF-α, HIF-1, thrombomodulin, and PDGF. There was a significant correlation between blast dose and the degree of tissue pathology (hemorrhage, neutrophil infiltrate, and oedema) with the worst scores in the high blast group. This study has demonstrated that blast injury can activate the endothelium and in some cases cause damage that in turn leads to pathological changes in the surrounding tissue. For the casualty injured by an explosion the damaging effects of hemorrhage and shock could be exacerbated by blast injury and vice versa so that even low levels of blast become damaging, all of which could affect tissue functionality and long-term outcomes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26418548 PMCID: PMC4617286 DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000455
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Shock ISSN: 1073-2322 Impact factor: 3.454
Measurement of the blast overpressure and impulse output from the compressed air blast wave generator
| Group | Blast nozzle distance (cm) | Mean peak overpressure (95% CI) (kPa) | Mean impulse at 1.5 mS duration (95% CI) (sPa) |
| High | 1.5 | 1,665 (1,604–1,725) | 420.5 (412.8–428.2) |
| Medium | 3.0 | 962.6 (897.2–1,028) | 256.4 (241.7–271.2) |
| Low | 5.0 | 398.1 (356.4–439.8) | 119.7 (110.3–129.2) |
| Sham | N/A | 0 | 0 |
The impulse was calculated at a representative time 1.5 ms from the onset of shock wave initiation. CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 1Number of endothelial cells in peripheral blood pre- and post-blast exposure (A). Sham, low, and medium groups n = 6, High group n = 9. Number of CECs was significantly higher at 6 h in high group compared with at 1 h and compared with sham at 6 h (P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). Error bars show ± SEM. Example of a CEC stained with FITC-UEA-1 with 4 μm magnetic beads attached (B).
Fig. 2Pathology in H&E stained muscle tissue sections.
Fig. 3Pathology scores of muscle tissue following blast exposure.
Fig. 4Expression levels of TNFα (A) and E-selectin (B) within muscle tissue indicate activation of the endothelium after blast.
Fig. 5Expression levels of Il-6 (A) and thrombomodulin (B) within muscle tissue indicate activation of the endothelium as well as immune activation after blast.
Fig. 6Expression levels of HIF-1α (A), PGC-1α (B), VEGF (C), and PDGA (D) in tissue. ∗∗Indicates significant difference compared with control.