Kiyohito Totsuka1, Hiroko Inui, Murilo F Roggia, Kazunori Hirasawa, Yasuo Noda, Takashi Ueta. 1. *Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; and †Orthoptics and Visual Science, Department of Rehabilitation, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of supplemental scleral buckle (SB) in pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched to identify studies comparing PPV with supplemental SB (PPV + SB) to PPV alone for the repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. The outcome measures were primary and final reattachment rates, and postoperative complications. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval in random effects for the comparison of outcomes between PPV + SB and PPV alone was calculated. RESULTS: Ten studies consisting of 1,704 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that the overall primary reattachment rate was significantly higher in PPV + SB than PPV alone (odds ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.39; P = 0.002). The final reattachment rate was equally high in both groups. Postoperative development of epiretinal membrane was more frequent in PPV + SB than in PPV alone (odds ratio, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-2.76; P = 0.001), whereas no significant difference in postoperative development of macular edema, proliferative vitreoretinopathy, or elevation of intraocular pressure was found. CONCLUSION: Supplemental SB increases the primary reattachment rate in PPV for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, although final reattachment rate was equally high with or without SB.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of supplemental scleral buckle (SB) in pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched to identify studies comparing PPV with supplemental SB (PPV + SB) to PPV alone for the repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. The outcome measures were primary and final reattachment rates, and postoperative complications. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval in random effects for the comparison of outcomes between PPV + SB and PPV alone was calculated. RESULTS: Ten studies consisting of 1,704 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that the overall primary reattachment rate was significantly higher in PPV + SB than PPV alone (odds ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.39; P = 0.002). The final reattachment rate was equally high in both groups. Postoperative development of epiretinal membrane was more frequent in PPV + SB than in PPV alone (odds ratio, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-2.76; P = 0.001), whereas no significant difference in postoperative development of macular edema, proliferative vitreoretinopathy, or elevation of intraocular pressure was found. CONCLUSION: Supplemental SB increases the primary reattachment rate in PPV for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, although final reattachment rate was equally high with or without SB.
Authors: Luke B Lindsell; Robert A Sisk; Daniel M Miller; Robert E Foster; Michael R Petersen; Christopher D Riemann; Robert K Hutchins Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2016-12-20