Literature DB >> 26418444

TREATMENT OF PERSISTENTLY OPEN MACULAR HOLES WITH HEAVY SILICONE OIL (DENSIRON 68) VERSUS C2F6. A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY.

Salvatore Cillino1, Giovanni Cillino, Lucia Lee Ferraro, Alessandra Casuccio.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of a mixture of silicone oil and perfluorohexyloctane (Densiron 68) with C2F6 gas endotamponade in the retreatment of persistently open full-thickness macular holes.
METHODS: In this prospective randomized study, 21 consecutive patients who were unsuccessfully operated on for large idiopathic full-thickness macular hole were randomly assigned to undergo a second vitrectomy with 20% perfluoroethane gas (C2F6, Group A) or with Densiron 68 tamponade (Group B). PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Endpoint (12 months) full-thickness macular hole closure rate by spectral domain optical coherence tomography and logMAR corrected distance visual acuity. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: postoperative adverse events.
RESULTS: The mean diameter of macular holes before the second pars plana vitrectomy was 680.3 ± 120.8 μm and 740.5 ± 105.3 μm in Groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.237); mean preoperative corrected distance visual acuity was 0.96 ± 0.36 logMAR and 1.12 ± 0.35 logMAR, respectively (P = 0.315). Endpoint full-thickness macular hole closure was obtained in 30% of patients (3/10) in Group A and in 82% (9/11) in Group B (P = 0.030). Corrected distance visual acuities were, respectively, 0.80 ± 0.25 logMAR and 0.55 ± 0.20 logMAR, with significant intergroup difference (P = 0.019); corrected distance visual acuity increased in Group B only (P = 0.003). No differences in complications were found.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that Densiron 68 tamponade could be a useful, safe, and more efficacious method than gas tamponade to retreat persisting macular holes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26418444     DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  7 in total

1.  Persistent macular holes - what is the best strategy for revision?

Authors:  Peter Szurman; Philip Wakili; Boris V Stanzel; Rudolf Siegel; Karl T Boden; Annekatrin Rickmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Effects of mesenchymal stem cells and their exosomes on the healing of large and refractory macular holes.

Authors:  Xiaomin Zhang; Juping Liu; Bo Yu; Feifei Ma; Xinjun Ren; Xiaorong Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  An Internal Limiting Membrane Plug and Gas Endotamponade for Recurrent or Persistent Macular Hole.

Authors:  Fabrizio Giansanti; Ruggero Tartaro; Tomaso Caporossi; Daniela Bacherini; Alfonso Savastano; Francesco Barca; Stanislao Rizzo
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  FIRST FAILED MACULAR HOLE SURGERY OR REOPENING OF A PREVIOUSLY CLOSED HOLE: Do We Gain by Reoperating?-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gerard A Reid; Niamh McDonagh; David M Wright; John T O Yek; Rohan W Essex; Noemi Lois
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.975

Review 5.  Update on surgical management of complex macular holes: a review.

Authors:  Mohd-Asyraaf Abdul-Kadir; Lik Thai Lim
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2021-12-20

Review 6.  Refractory full thickness macular hole: current surgical management.

Authors:  Rino Frisina; Irene Gius; Luigi Tozzi; Edoardo Midena
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.456

7.  Infracyanine Green vs. Brilliant Blue G in Inverted Flap Surgery for Large Macular Holes: A Long-Term Swept-Source OCT Analysis.

Authors:  Salvatore Cillino; Massimo Castellucci; Giovanni Cillino; Valentina Sunseri; Costanza Novara; Francesco Di Pace; Maria Vadalà; Vincenza Bonfiglio; Alessandra Casuccio
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.